|
peanut butter
Sun Dec 19, 2010 at 18:48:22 PM PST
|
|
Organic and natural nut butters settle while sitting in warehouses and on store shelves. Stirring them up is a tedious and sometimes messy job that none of us like.
Be thou afflicted no more. Our shared problem has been solved. I expect to receive an award at the next meeting of whichever organization bestows prizes for things like this.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 452 words in story)
|
|
Fri Jul 02, 2010 at 06:00:00 AM PDT
|
|
I recently had the privilege of interviewing two food poisoning victims, each from famous recent national outbreaks. There are many differences between them, but there are three major similarities: They provided the health departments with the samples that conclusively linked their illness to the tainted food products, they have changed their diets in similar ways to avoid food poisoning in the future, and they are upset that the government has done nothing (YET) to make our food supply safer (but hope the Senate will vote on the food safety bill soon).
Jacob Hurley accompanies his dad to testify before Congress
This is a cute kid. But, if things had gone a little bit differently, he's a cute kid who wouldn't still be here today. I spoke to his dad, Peter, who works as a policeman in Oregon. Jacob (who goes by Jake) was three years old when he got sick.
|
|
There's More...
:: (4
Comments, 1034 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 15:43:06 PM PDT
|
|
A friend sent me an article called "The Worst Packaged Food Lies." I wasn't that impressed over #!. Organic Kraft Mac 'n Cheese isn't actually healthy. Umm... duh. But then I got to #2 and that stopped me cold. You know the reduced fat peanut butter? I grew up eating that stuff! I ate it for years! According to the article Smucker's reduced fat peanut butter makes up for the missing fat with corn maltodextrin. End result: reduced fat peanut butter has 10 calories less than the full fat version. And yet, buying the reduced fat version was so important to my mother that once when Dad bought the full fat kind she sent him back to the store to return it.
Another good catch in the article? Nutri-Grain Strawberry Cereal Bars. I used to eat those too. And this is just sick.
The claim: "Naturally and artificially flavored"
The truth: While the FDA requires manufacturers to disclose the use of artificial flavoring on the front of the box, the requirements for what is considered "natural" and "real" are not strict: Even trace amounts of the essence or extract of fruit counts as natural. So yes, there is fruit in this bar, but it falls third in the ingredients list, behind HFCS and corn syrup.
What the article should say but doesn't is that packaged foods in general aren't a good idea. Sure you can swap out a Larabar for that Nutrigrain bar, but why not eat an apple instead?
|
|
Discuss
:: (6
Comments)
|
|
Thu Mar 19, 2009 at 17:08:43 PM PDT
|
|
This morning the House Energy & Commerce committee subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations held a hearing on the salmonella peanut butter outbreak. It was their 3rd in a series of three, this time focused on the companies supplied by Peanut Corporation of America and their lapse in food safety vigilance that allowed this to happen.
Opening statements, written testimony, and documents for the hearing can be found here.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 2019 words in story)
|
|
Fri Mar 06, 2009 at 16:15:17 PM PST
|
Well, the FDA finally released their findings from the Texas PCA plant earlier this week, here are just some of the 'highlights' -
* A dead mouse stuck to a glue trap. "The mouse appeared to have died recently," the report reads.
* "What appeared to be rodent excreta pellets too numerous to count were observed in the cabinet under the sink in the south most kitchen."
* "In the cabinet north of the dishwasher ... I counted approximately 27 rodent excreta pellets."
* "Another dead mouse was found just outside the south most doorway of the kitchen. ... This mouse also appeared to have recently died."
* "What appeared to be a bird's nest was observed in the wall/ceiling metal support beam at southwest corner of the mezzanine area."
* Processing machines had buildup of "gooey" peanut paste.
* Numerous roof leaks.
In an ironic twist, it turns out that a Texas State Health Inspector regularly drove past the Plainview, TX PCA plant that the state didn't know existed on his way to other jobs -
A state inspector drove by the Plainview plant regularly on his way to other jobs, but he never entered the facility.
"I find it inconceivable that an inspector could pass the plant and not know food was processed there," Estes said. "We need a mechanism where people are aware of what's happening in their communities."
Also, an AP article from yesterday notes how easy it was for PCA to fool inspectors into believing it was licensed -
Jack McCasland, environmental inspector for the Plainview-Hale County Health Department, said plant officials led him to believe the licensing process was under way when he visited the facility before it opened.
"To be honest, I never really thought to follow up on it," McCasland said. "It just never occurred to me that they wouldn't be (licensed)."
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Mar 04, 2009 at 22:31:51 PM PST
|
In the New York Times, Kim Severson and Andrew Martin mar an otherwise decent article with a terrible closing -
Emily Wyckoff, who lives in Buffalo, buys local food and cooks from scratch as much as possible. Although she still buys organic milk and organic peanut butter for her three children, the organic label means less to her these days - especially when it comes to processed food in packages like crackers and cookies.
"I want to care, but you have to draw the line," she said.
But the line stops when it comes to basic food safety.
Recently, a sign near the Peter Pan and Skippy at her local grocery store declared that those brands were safe from peanut contamination. There was no similar sign near her regular organic brand.
"I bought the national brand," she said. "Isn't that funny?"
This reminds me of those activity books I remember from my childhood, the ones where you have to circle the things that are out of place in a scene. So what's wrong with this picture?
First - how could the criminal actions of PCA and the failings of certain organic certifiers even be remotely connected in any way to "buying local and cooking from scratch"? Are the editors at the New York Times on vacation this week, or just asleep?
Also, let's think about the 'signs in the grocery store' part for a bit. Anybody who's been alive and even remotely aware for the past few decades should know by now that supermarkets often give preferential treatment, shelf space, displays and special in-store advertising considerations to the giant food manufacturers. So we're to assume that because food industry conglomerates ConAgra (Peter Pan) and Unilever (Skippy) are favorites of the chain supermarkets, that their products are inherently 'safer' than any other brand not affected by this particular recall, just because signs in supermarkets say so?
Of course in that case, we'd also have to forget the inconvenient fact that ConAgra's Peter Pan is the original salmonella peanut butter company.
"Isn't that funny?"
Update via Jill: US Food Policy weighs in...
|
|
Discuss
:: (8
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 25, 2009 at 03:29:35 AM PST
|
Tests for salmonella at PCA's third plant in Suffolk, Virginia have come back negative (so far), but this morning AP reports that the Virginia plant also has a long history of unsanitary conditions -
In Virginia, tests for salmonella have come back negative. But inspection reports revealed evidence of rodents and other unsanitary conditions at the Peanut Corp. plant in Suffolk. State inspectors repeatedly found evidence of rodents at the plant since Peanut Corp. bought it in 2000, according to inspection reports.
As recently as October, a Virginia inspector found "an accumulation of black, green and yellow mold" on blanched peanuts and 43 containers each holding 2,000-pounds of peanuts. The plant manager told the inspector after the discovery that those peanuts would be destroyed if not used for animal feed and oil stock.
That must be the new Rainbow Mold flavor.
Also, following up on the news from a week and a half ago of the new salmonella find at PCA's Texas plant, salmonella poisoning cases linked to products from PCA's Texas plant have moved beyond just Colorado, and on into Oregon -
Oregon health officials have confirmed a new case of salmonella infection, and for the first time peanuts sold in bins are the likely culprit. The peanuts came from the Peanut Corp. of America's Plainview, Texas, plant, which has been linked to a salmonella outbreak.
The recall continues to expand, and more below the fold...
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 3199 words in story)
|
|
Wed Feb 25, 2009 at 02:01:53 AM PST
|
Welcome news from AFP -
The commission's task would be "to strengthen the country's food monitoring system, whose low efficiency has long been blamed for repeated food scandals," the report said.
[...]
Experts have said a key reason for ... regulatory shortcomings is that too many different agencies have jurisdiction over the food industry.
Absolutely, and it's about time! Even though it's fading from the headlines, the peanut salmonella outbreak is still ongoing, and the number of sicknesses continues to grow as one of the largest food recalls in history continues.
As Jill asks in the title of her Alternet article published yesterday, how do we know what's safe to eat? Well unfortunately, we're still going to have to wait a bit for that here in the US...
Because the country currently setting up that central food safety agency is China. Where at least 70 people were just sickened from eating tainted pork -
Investigations showed the suspect pork bought from local markets was contaminated with clenbuterol, a drug often given to people to treat asthma but also commonly used to cut body fat.
Cases of clenbuterol being given to pigs in China to reduce their fat have been recorded, but it is a banned food additive because it can be fatal for humans, the China Daily said.
One of the worst cases involving clenbuterol occurred in Shanghai in 2006 when 336 people were hospitalised after eating pig meat or organs contaminated with the additive, according to the paper.
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 23:49:07 PM PST
|
|
Oh how I am loving Bill Marler right about now. The other day I went looking for Peanut Corporation of America's website. I figured it would have some info about the company, plus some amusing marketing text about how great they are. By this point, the site is nothing but a bunch of press releases about recalls.
But nothing ever goes away on the Internet. Bill Marler went and found all the fun stuff that I couldn't find myself :) In a post called Where Peanut Butter Web Pages Go To Die he quotes the old site. Here's my favorite paragraph
Safety and Quality do make a difference. We have a remarkable Food-Safety record, developed in an environment committed to continuous training and state-of-the-art Food Safety techniques. From the corporate office to the plant floors, our comprehensive Quality Control program assists us in preventing error, reducing waste, meeting requirements, measuring results and satisfying our customers.
Oh, yes! They DO have a remarkable food safety record. In fact, the entire national press corps is abuzz talking about it! Marler's got a second post of internet fun up here. Also, he mentions that due to the recent bankruptcy of PCA, he's changing all of his lawsuits to name Stewart Parnell as the defendant instead of the corporation. So... nice try Parnell!
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 14:42:45 PM PST
|
|
There is one blog on the web whose peanut butter coverage has gone above and beyond lately. This week, Obama Foodorama has outdone itself with post after wonderful, detailed post about the intricacies of the peanut butter salmonella outbreak - including in person coverage of the Congressional hearings where PCA president Stewart Parnell took the fifth. Here are links to the blog entries you should check out:
Pre-Hearing: Ms. Foodorama gave us the cast of characters to expect on the Hill and announced she'd be at the hearing.
Intra-Hearing: During the hearing, Obama Foodorama gave us exclusive LIVE coverage via Twiter, which I posted about here
Post-Hearing: After the hearing, she wrote up her experiences with a post about Parnell's damning emails being read into the Congressional record and another about Rep. John Dingell calling the FDA's Dr. Stephen Sundlof incompetent. She followed THAT up with another post of her overall thoughts on the hearing. But if there's one post about the hearing you MUST READ, it's this one, Obama Foodorama's most comprehensive post by far.
Since the hearing, she's continued her coverage with an update about PCA's organic certification (oh yes, it's true!) and an interactive timeline of the peanut butter recall.
So, for all of your hard work, from La Vida Locavore to Obama Foodorama, we say thanks!!!
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00:00 AM PST
|
|
The Washington Post just published an op ed calling for tougher food safety regulation. At this point, I think all of us can get behind some tough food safety rules. But are new laws the answer? Or is the answer actually enforcing the laws already on the books and giving the FDA the staff, the funding, and the teeth to do so? (Or perhaps a little of both?) After all, I cannot imagine that current laws say "It's OK to knowingly sell tainted peanuts to consumers" or "If you are inspected and your plant is found to be totally filthy, that's OK."
|
|
There's More...
:: (8
Comments, 549 words in story)
|
|
Tue Feb 17, 2009 at 07:12:31 AM PST
|
|
(cross-posted at Orange)
We already know that Stewart Parnell better have a lawyer on speed dial for his (in the words of Rosa DeLauro) "reprehensible and criminal" behavior. A lot of people have suggested--quite rightly, in my view--that he is guilty of second-degree murder, or at the very least, manslaughter. It's my considered opinion that this is second-degree murder--an important distinction, because this means Parnell could face RICO charges at both the criminal and civil level.
Based on what we know so far, Parnell's behavior, not just in the events immediately before the salmonella outbreak, but for several years, are the very definition of second-degree murder. In order to prove second-degree murder, you have to prove that the defendant acted with reckless disregard and indifference for human life. You need only look at the emails Parnell sent out ordering the shipping of tainted material. If ordering products to be shipped which you know contain salmonella doesn't constitute reckless disregard and indifference for human life, what does?
But even more damningly, we got proof on yesterday's Good Morning America that Parnell knew there were unsanitary conditions at one of his plants and failed to clean it up.
|
|
There's More...
:: (3
Comments, 500 words in story)
|
|
Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 11:00:26 AM PST
|
(Great diary, thanks for the crosspost! - promoted by JayinPortland)
(cross-posted at Daily Kos)
Today's Washington Post has a front-page story--about the rise and fall of Peanut Corporation of America. The most devastating tidbits come from a former buyer for a major snack company, David Brooks. Apparently, the conditions that eventually led to the salmonella outbreak had been prevalent in the company's operations for at least 20 years.
On three occasions in the mid-1980s, Brooks inspected PCA's Gorman plant to determine whether to buy its peanut products, he said. Each time, he gave the plant a failing grade.
"It was just filthy," said Brooks, who has since retired from the food business. "Dust was all over the beams, the braces of the building. The roofs leaked, the windows would be open, and birds would fly through the building. . . . It was just a time bomb waiting to go off, and everybody in the peanut industry in Georgia, Virginia and Texas -- they all knew."
This was back when Hugh Parnell, Sr. still ran the company. He sold it in 1994, but Stewart Parnell bought it back in 2000 and added the Georgia and Virginia plants later on. Like father, like son.
|
|
There's More...
:: (17
Comments, 174 words in story)
|
|
Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 06:47:29 AM PST
|
Although it was originally thought that all salmonella sicknesses in the current outbreak were traced back to PCA's Georgia plant, it appears that is no longer the case -
Lynne Terry (aka "peanut girl") of the Oregonian broke the story yesterday that Colorado Health Officials have traced six Salmonella illnesses to the now closed Peanut Corporation of America's (PCA's) Plainville, Texas plant of Peanut Corporation of America. Until Lynne broke the story, "federal authorities had identified the company's plant in Blakely, Georgia as the [only] source of the outbreak that has sickened nearly 640 people and killed nine." According to Lynn, "epidemiologists in Denver told [her] on Friday that they have linked six new cases to the [Texas] plant...."
Here's the original Oregonian article from Friday -
On Thursday, Texas health authorities ordered the recall of all peanut-related ingredients ever shipped from the plant, which had operated since 2005 without an inspection. Texas officials found dead rodents and feces, and preliminary tests by a private lab indicated salmonella was present.
Wow, this is just getting ridiculous now. Bill Marler also asks another great question - has anybody taken a look at their third plant in Virginia?
|
|
Discuss
:: (5
Comments)
|
|
Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 00:21:22 AM PST
|
Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey... goodbye! PCA, Peanut Corporation of America, the company that caused the salmonella outbreak through severe criminal negligence, has declared bankruptcy. They filed chapter 7 and they will liquidate their assets. Please pardon me if I don't shed a tear for them. Oh wait - here's a reason to cry. According to Jean Halloran of Consumers Union:
PCA's declaration of bankruptcy will, among other things, shield it from liability suits filed by consumers who became sick or whose loved ones died as a result of eating PCA's peanut products.
Fortunately, it looks like lawyer superstar Bill Marler knows where to get the victims some justice.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 302 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|