|
agriculture policy
Mon Sep 29, 2008 at 14:16:02 PM PDT
|
|
cross-posted at Bleeding Heartland
High levels of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) in the Raccoon River forced the Des Moines Water Works to switch to a secondary source in August.
You would think that a problem affecting the state's largest water treatment facility would grab the attention of the state Department of Natural Resources. The U.S. Department of Interior's official definition of "natural resources" mentions "Land, fish, wildlife, biota, air, water, ground water, drinking water supplies and other such resources belonging to, managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, or otherwise controlled by the U.S., any state or local government [...]."
But you would be wrong, because the Iowa DNR didn't bother to look into what caused the Raccoon River's elevated levels of cyanobacteria.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 728 words in story)
|
|
Wed Sep 10, 2008 at 17:42:20 PM PDT
|
|
cross-posted at Bleeding Heartland
Sometimes one small step against confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) leads to another.
Over at Iowa Independent, Jason Hancock reports that
A member of the state's Environmental Protection Commission who has been labeled by critics as "pro-factory farms" has stepped down.
Ralph Klemme, a former Republican state representative from LeMars, resigned from the nine-person oversight panel, which is part of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, late last week. He told the Coalition to Support Iowa's Farmers that the commission's "increasing tilt against agriculture" was his main reason to step down.
The commission's recent vote to reject permits for two hog confinements in Dallas County appears to have been a major factor in Klemme's decision.
I was against Klemme's appointment to this commission in 2007 because of his involvement with corporate agriculture groups.
My suspicions were warranted. In a statement welcoming Klemme's resignation, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement recounted his record of looking out for agribusiness instead of the environment:
Klemme voted in May to approve a large hog factory in Greene County that was overwhelmingly opposed by local residents, county officials and local business leaders. He also voted against a common-sense rule that would have limited the amount of manure that factory farm owners could be spread on soybean crops.
Governor Chet Culver should replace Klemme with someone committed to protecting the environment. Otherwise why call it an Environmental Protection Commission?
I am hopeful because several of Culver's appointments to this body have been quite good.
On the other hand, I wouldn't underestimate the clout of corporate agriculture groups that will lobby the governor to replace Klemme with a person who is equally sympathetic to their interests. We saw this summer that agriculture trumped the environment on the task forces associated with the Rebuild Iowa Commission.
Whoever takes Klemme's place on the Environmental Protection Commission, I view his resignation as a healthy sign. The majority of commission members are not willing to look the other way regarding the environmental impacts of CAFOs.
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 15:34:22 PM PDT
|
( - promoted by Asinus Asinum Fricat)
This year's severe weather disrupted the growing season in Iowa. To make matters worse, many sustainable farmers (such as fruit and vegetable growers) do not qualify for federal crop insurance. Yet a huge amount of time and money is involved in replanting or replacing lost crops.
I enclose an e-mail describing an assistance effort geared toward family, sustainable and market farmers in Iowa. These grants may seem very small to you, but even $500 can make a difference to a cash-strapped small farmer.
The links did not come through when I copied and pasted, but you click here to donate to the project. If you are a farmer in need of assistance, click the same link to find application guidelines and forms.
The Iowa Farm Disaster Relief Coalition -- fourteen Iowa farm, faith and rural organizations including the Center for Rural Affairs is collecting donations and making emergency funds available for Iowa's family, sustainable and market farmers who suffered losses due to storms, rain and flooding in Iowa earlier this year.
Applications and guidelines are available on the coalition's website. Donations may be made to the fund on the website as well.
Farmers may apply for up to $500 in relief to help offset household expenses, which in turn will free up finances for replanting, clean up, repair, etc., on the farm. It is our hope that assisting as many qualifying farmers as possible with grants up to $500 to cover expenses will help ease some of the pain of the tough times created by these disasters.
Again, please find applications instructions and grant guidelines on the coalition's website.
Applications will be reviewed as quickly as possible by a committee of representatives of the state's membership based sustainable agriculture groups. The deadline for the first round of applications is Sept. 30, 2008. Additional rounds of grants will be made available as funding allows.
For more information, contact John Crabtree at 402-687-2103 extension 1010, or by email at johnc@cfra.org.
Whether or not you can apply or contribute, please help us get the word out by letting others who may be interested know about the project.
---
Farm Aid is supporting the disaster-relief efforts of the coalition, which includes Buy Fresh Buy Local Iowa, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, Iowa Farmers Union, Iowa Network for Community Agriculture, Iowa Organic Association, National Catholic Rural Life Conference, Practical Farmers of Iowa, Women Food and Agriculture Network, Edible Iowa River Valley, Iowa Valley Resource Conservation and Development, National Farmers Organization, Churches' Center for the Land and People, Atlantic farmer and advocate Denise O'Brien and the Center for Rural Affairs in Lyons, Nebraska which is serving as the project's fiscal sponsor.
Thanks to all the participating organizations and to Denise O'Brien, one of the best advocates for sustainable agriculture that Iowa has ever known. Denise was the Democratic nominee for secretary of agriculture in 2006.
|
|
Discuss
:: (2
Comments)
|
|
Tue Aug 19, 2008 at 16:09:14 PM PDT
|
( - promoted by Jill Richardson)
cross-posted at Bleeding Heartland
Iowa's legislature and state agencies have been notorious for doing nothing to address huge pollution problems stemming from confined-animal feeding operations (CAFOs).
But some big news came out of the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission today:
The state Environmental Protection Commission today rejected previously approved permits for two large hog confinements in Dallas County.
The surprise move came after a two-hour meeting in Urbandale at which commissioners said rules drawn up to dictate approval of large-scale confinement permits leave out important environmental considerations and neighbors' quality-of-life concerns.
"There are battle lines being drawn on this, and it creates a political situation that the Legislature cannot ignore," commission chairman Henry Marquard said.
Only a handful of permits have been denied in Iowa, but rarely has one been turned down after it met approval from the Department of Natural Resources and passed a complicated scoring system adopted by counties, including Dallas.
The nine-member commission voted to block these permits on a strong 6-2 vote. I wouldn't be surprised if the matter ends up in court, however.
Noneed4thneed wrote about the controversy over the new Dallas County CAFOs in late July:
The proposed hog confinements would have a total of 7,440 hogs in rural Dallas County, which is the fastest growing county in the state. These confinements will produce as much waste as a town of 30,000 people and it will go untreated.
Earlier this month, Dallas County Supervisors voted against allowing these proposed hog confinements, but in reality there isn't much the local people can do about the hog confinements that will be owned by the out of state company, Cargill.
We need federal legislation to make CAFOs pay for the harm they cause, because our state legislature has shown itself to be unwilling to act to protect air and water quality in Iowa.
But in the absence of federal action, a state law giving counties "local control" (agricultural zoning rights) would at least offer some protection. Some county supervisors would rubber-stamp every proposed CAFO, but others would follow the lead of the Dallas County supervisors.
For all I know, Cargill will sue to reinstate their permits to open these hog confinements. But however this story ends, it's good to see the majority of the Environmental Protection Commission's members doing something to protect the environment.
UPDATE: I learned from the online newsletter of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement that the Iowa Department of Natural Resources recently denied a permit for a different proposed CAFO.
Because of the efforts of CCI members and other local residents, the DNR recently denied a 4,900-head hog factory proposed for southern Appanoose County. The permit application did not meet legal requirements, nor did their master matrix pass muster. Although the applicant for this proposed confinement is a local resident, the 4,900 hogs would have been owned by Cargill. Cargill, one of the largest privately-held corporations in the world, has been behind a number of proposed factory farms around the state, including two proposed 7,440-head hog factories in northwest Dallas County.
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
|
|
Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 15:46:17 PM PDT
|
( - promoted by OrangeClouds115)
cross-posted in slightly different form at Bleeding Heartland
Please tell me this is someone's idea of a joke.
I already worry that as president, Barack Obama would do too little to rein in the excesses of corporate power in Washington.
Now Politico reports that Obama's vetting team is floating the name of Ann Veneman, who was Agriculture Secretary during George W. Bush's first term, with members of Congress.
I can't understand what Veneman could possibly have going for her. She's executive director of UNICEF now, but who cares? When she was in the cabinet, she didn't promote sustainable agriculture or sensible health protections.
As the Organic Consumers Association reported when Bush appointed her, Veneman had a long history of standing with corporate interests. When she left Bush's cabinet, her "vision and commitment" won praise from the American Meat Institute. Politico notes:
The low-profile Republican was close to food and agriculture industries but clashed with farm-state Democrats and environmentalists during her tenure, which lasted from 2001 to 2004.
Maybe Veneman is being mentioned to throw journalists off the scent, or to trick progressives into feeling relieved if Obama chooses a corporate Democrat who's not "that bad."
It bothers me that Obama would even allow his team to consider someone like Veneman, even as a diversion. I want the next administration to make CAFOs pay for the harm they cause.
UPDATE: The Nation explains why Veneman would be "a uniquely awful choice" for Obama.
|
|
Discuss
:: (16
Comments)
|
|
|
|
|
|