Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Washington Post

I Dare You: Put Sewage Sludge in Your Mouth

by: Jill Richardson

Sun Apr 24, 2011 at 15:09:26 PM PDT

A new Washington Post piece by Darryl Fears claims sewage sludge is safe enough to put in your mouth. Specifically, the statement was made about "Class A Biosolids," the treated sewage sludge (renamed "biosolids" to make it sound less unpleasant) that has regulated amounts of 10 heavy metals, salmonella, and fecal coliform.

What else might you find in sewage sludge? Well... Alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates, dioxins and furans, flame retardants, heavy metals (including some that are not regulated), hormones, pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, pharmaceuticals, phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrogens, steroids, and more... Still wanna put that in your mouth?

Fears was not advocating that anyone put sewage sludge in their mouths... at least, not directly. The article was instead about how sludge should be used as fertilizer for food crops... which people would then put in their mouths.

For the past year, on and off, I've been working with the Center for Media & Democracy's Food Rights Network, a group that opposes the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer on food crops. So, full disclosure, I've been getting paid to research the hell out of sewage sludge and to write about it. I've even been paid to go to my local Home Depot and buy three bags of sludge compost to send samples to a lab for testing. And let me tell you... if the long list of sludge contaminants and the EPA's own record of what they found in sewage sludge doesn't scare you off of using sludge as fertilizer, the smell of it will. It's not a poop smell - it's a chemical smell. An incredibly volatile, potent one.

The question is, of course, what are you putting in your mouth when you eat food grown in sludge? And the answers are: "We don't know" and "That depends." We don't know because it's almost entirely unregulated and because there are an awful lot of chemicals out there that just haven't been studied well enough to have the answers. Additionally, once you finish studying each individual chemical, then you'd have to study all of the combinations to see what happens when you mix them together in a toxic goop and apply them to farms and gardens. And it depends because each batch of sewage sludge is different, based on which households, hospitals, and industries are contributing to the waste stream and what they've put down the drain that particular day or week.

For farmer Andy McElmurray, it depended that a Nutrasweet plant was dumping thallium (rat poison) - an unregulated contaminant in sewage sludge - into the waste stream. The thallium went from the sludge applied to his soil, to his forage crops, to his cows, and all the way to the milk he sold to grocery stores. He only found out about the hazards of sludge after an extensive investigation into why his cows were dropping dead one after the other. McElmurray and his dad both got sick from working around sludge, and the farm went out of business. Dairying isn't very profitable when your cows are all dead.

Fears notes the sludge industry's favorite talking point: We have all of this human waste, and what are we going to do with it? Well, what should we do with pesticides, perfluorinated compounds, and flame retardants? I don't know. I don't think there's a good answer. In the case of some of the most common flame retardants (PBDEs), the world's answer was to ban them in the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. I think that's a step in the right direction. The problem is that "persistent" refers to the fact that this stuff doesn't break down. The answers to the sludge problem are upstream ones. We shouldn't make such toxic substances if we don't have a way to dispose of them. So, sure, it's a problem to figure out where to put all of the sewage sludge. But lying that it's safe and then selling it to unsuspecting gardeners ain't the answer.

Another favorite sludge talking point in the article is that manure, including human poop, is "the world's original fertilizer." And, sure, the Chinese were famous for using night soil as fertilizer (one reason why you don't see salads on the menu at Chinese restaurants... all the veggies are cooked in Chinese cuisine). But the pre-industrial Chinese were not manufacturing and mixing toxic chemicals in with their night soil.

So go ahead, Darryl Fears, put some class A biosolids in your mouth. Or, let's make it more pleasant... how about a carrot grown in them? Still wanna eat that?

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

Milk Money

by: Jill Richardson

Mon Oct 19, 2009 at 11:06:20 AM PDT

Congrats to Kathy Ozer of the National Family Farm Coalition for getting a Letter to the Editor printed in the Washington Post. She wrote in about a recent WaPo article that spoke about the $350 million in government aid going to dairy farmers without fairly portraying the crisis dairy farmers are going through these days. The real beneficiaries of the government money, says Ozer, are companies like Kraft and Dean Foods. I agree. If things were fair, dairy processors would have to pay a price reflecting the cost of production for the milk they purchase, and they would not be able to undercut American dairy farmers by importing cheap, low quality milk protein concentrate (MPC). Here's the letter:

Support that dairy farmers deserve

The Oct. 9 editorial "Got Money?," denouncing $350 million in emergency funding for dairy farmers, accused those farmers -- suffering through their worst crisis since the Great Depression -- of milking taxpayers and consumers. Nowhere did it mention the real beneficiaries of the millions that we are spending to sustain the livelihoods of America's remaining 59,000 dairy farmers: corporate agribusinesses.

While farmers are receiving 1970 prices for their milk (not adjusted for inflation), Dean Foods, the largest fluid milk processor, and Kraft Foods have recorded gigantic profit increases. Because dairy processors refuse to pay farmers a fair price for their milk, taxpayers are now subsidizing their profits. Consumers should target their outrage at these entities, not dairy farmers, who have no control over the price they receive or the prices at the grocery store.

We have lost more than 80 percent of our dairy farmers since 1981, when President Ronald Reagan decided to deregulate the price of milk. For anyone who wants access to local fresh milk and fears becoming reliant on imports of powdered milk, supporting our remaining dairy farmers is vital.

Katherine Ozer, Washington
Executive Director
National Family Farm Coalition

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Is the Organic Label Worth the Paper It's Printed On?

by: Jill Richardson

Wed Jul 22, 2009 at 21:35:49 PM PDT

I've semi-neglected talking about a major Washington Post piece questioning the purity of organics from earlier this month. There's been quite a bit of conversation about this, following its publication. Sam Fromartz, author of Organic, Inc., gave his reaction to the WaPo piece on his blog, Chews Wise.
There's More... :: (5 Comments, 623 words in story)

Unraveling Organic

by: Sophy

Wed Jul 08, 2009 at 14:04:13 PM PDT

The organic food that you're buying may not be 100% organic and therefore discredits the integrity of the organic certification. That is the basic gist of The Washington Post's much deliberated article, "Purity of Federal 'Organic' Label is Questioned", published July 3rd. It is a well-known fact that the organic certification is not perfect nor is it the end-all, be-all solution to our broken food system. In truth, I am quite tired of hearing people use "organic" as the sole qualifier to their healthy, "sustainable" diet. A Cheeto is a Cheeto, is a Cheeto by any other name, even "organic", and the company that produces it may not be sustainable in the least.

Multinational corporations have been gobbling up organic companies since they figured out they could make a buck or two off the $23 billion-a-year business. When you buy Horizon Milk, you're supporting dairy giant and factory farmers extraordinaire, Dean Foods. Boca Burgers are owned by Kraft, Odwalla is owned by Coca-Cola, Stonyfield by Danone. (For some great charts on organic food, click here.) For those who care simply about eating healthier, perhaps it doesn't really matter who owns the brand. For others who care about where their dollars are going, buying conventional organic is just buying into the same old corporate machine.

Granted, there are a good number of successful companies who have managed to remain independent. Organic Valley, Amy's Kitchen and Eden Foods are just a few examples that have managed to stay away from corporate takeover. There are also some serious benefits that come along with organic. Animals are fed vegetarian feed and are not given hormones or antibiotics unless ill. Fruits and vegetables are not treated with pesticides. The organic certification also prohibits genetic modification, sewage sludge and irradiation.  

There's More... :: (5 Comments, 493 words in story)
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox