|
Michael Pollan
Thu May 21, 2009 at 15:45:53 PM PDT
|
|
When Washington State University decided to distribute The Omnivore's Dilemma to all freshmen at orientation, "a member of the board of regents raised concerns about the work's focus on problems associated with agribusiness." The critic was Harold Cochran, who owns a 5,500-acre farm and is a member of the Washington Association of Wheat Growers.
Now, WSU will not distribute the book, supposedly due to financial concerns and cost. Instead, professors are simply encouraged to incorporate the text into their curricula.
However, the announcement that the book would not be distributed at summer orientation came seven weeks after the book was chosen. In the meantime, the university purchased nearly 4,000 copies.
"Unless they wanted to have a big book-burning in the middle of Terrell Mall, I don't see how they intended to save money by making this decision," said Jeff Sellen, a general education professor and member of the common reading selection committee.
This is not a problem limited to one university. Take, for example, the President of South Dakota University, who also happens to be on the board of directors at Monsanto. Cornell and the University of California have both taken money from Monsanto, but having your president on their board of directors takes things to a whole new level. And clearly, as you can see at Washington State, the interests of the faculty do translate into the education of the students.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Fri May 15, 2009 at 10:08:33 AM PDT
|
|
Michael Pollan's out promoting the paperback release of In Defense of Food. See him on the Colbert Report, and listen on the Leonard Lopate show and on Democracy Now. Pollan amazes me at his ability to never do a boring interview. You think you might have heard all he's had to say, but each interview brings new insight.
My favorite new Pollan-ism from these interviews is his advice "Don't eat anything you've seen advertised" and "Don't eat anything with a health claim." Healthy foods don't have ad budgets or packaging. In the past, Pollan told his fans "Don't eat anything with more than 5 ingredients," and then Haagen-Dazs came out with 5 ingredient ice cream. He told us to avoid HFCS and now junk food makers are giving us "healthy" versions of their junk made with (massive amounts of) real sugar. I like the new advice. If they junk food makers want to catch up to Pollan on this one, the only way they can do so is by dropping all of their health claims and ending all of their food advertising.
Another great point from this latest batch of interviews? Think of what it means for a product to stay fresh for 6 months on the shelf. There are no nutrients in there that any bacteria, mold, fungus, etc, has any interest whatsoever in eating. Shouldn't that tell us something? Better yet, Pollan told Colbert that the difference between corn and HFCS is like the difference between coca leaves and crack. Ha!!!
|
|
Discuss
:: (7
Comments)
|
|
Thu May 14, 2009 at 14:08:57 PM PDT
|
|
Yesterday I went to see the most important movie of the year: Food, Inc. Now, that's a strong statement. Is it really the most important movie of the year? Let me put it this way. All movies and TV gives me migraines, so much so that I have not seen a single movie in 2 full years. That's how long it's been since there was a movie out that I thought would be so great that I should have a migraine headache for it. I didn't see The Garden, I didn't see King Corn, I didn't see The Future of Food... I didn't even see Slumdog Millionaire. But for Food, Inc, I decided it was worth shlepping my ass up to LA and getting a migraine that would last at least a day if not several. I bet you no one else can give Food, Inc that kind of endorsement, huh? Better yet? You don't even have to get a migraine for it. You can just watch it, free of head pain, nausea, or any other unpleasant side effects.
Why was it THAT important? No other film that I can name covers a global crisis of a basic human need in such a compelling, informative, and accurate way. This film is what I had hoped the movie version of Fast Food Nation would have been, except it's twice as good because it threw in The Omnivore's Dilemma too. Together, I consider those two books the Food Bible (old and new testaments, respectively), and now they are available in movie form for all of America to watch.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 728 words in story)
|
|
Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 10:00:00 AM PDT
|
|
The NY Post says you suck. Yes, you! And you, and you, and you... and me too. We all suck. We are "gourmonsters" and "food police." That's because they feel threatened that we like our food to taste good. They're probably insecure about their own crappy-tasting food and potential resulting health problems. Instead of ditching the nasty frozen meals and weeks old produce, they'd rather inflate their egos by ranting against us. And you know what? If it makes them tolerate their miserable diets better, then that's fine. Go ahead. Rant away. It's probably less painful than realizing how nasty the industrialized food system actually is and than facing the reality that your air, soil, and water are polluted and your health is diminished by the food you eat. And I don't want you to suffer.
But tell you what. Rather than having you feel better by lashing out at me while eating shit, I've got a better idea. There's this great website, Eat Well Guide, and it tells you where to get good food near you. You don't have to be afraid of it costing a lot. You see, when you buy food directly from the farmer, the middlemen don't need to take a cut. Right now about 19 cents from every dollar spent on food goes to the farmer. The other 81 cents goes to distributors, retailers, processors, and other middlemen. When you buy directly from the farmer, you can get terrific fresh, local, organic, sustainable, healthy, fair, clean, good (and all of the other adjectives the NY Post apparently dislikes) food for less than you would pay for lower quality food at a store. You'll probably also save some of the money you would otherwise spend at the doctor later in life - and you'll enjoy your food more! I know, it's a crazy idea, but think about it. Seriously. Your anger towards me probably hurts you a lot more than it hurts me. I'm trying to help.
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Thu Apr 02, 2009 at 10:11:39 AM PDT
|
|
|
|
Discuss
:: (19
Comments)
|
|
Fri Mar 27, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM PDT
|
I haven't given you a sampler platter for a while, so here's an extra long one to make up for that:
- Good news from Starbucks - they are switching suppliers for their ice cream from Dreyers to Unilever, which offers them an rbGH-free line. Also, Tillamook ice cream is now rbGH-free. Hooray!
- Bill Marler talks about painful sex. Ok, that sounded wrong, I think. Ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) is a type of foodborne disease from eating predatory ocean fish contaminated with ciguatoxins. It's rare, but there was a recent "cluster" of cases, and the patients reported dyspareunia, or painful sex, as a symptom.
Continued...
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 443 words in story)
|
|
Mon Mar 23, 2009 at 12:27:28 PM PDT
|
|
The New York Times has an article called "Is a Food Revolution Now in Season?" yet it doesn't paint the movement as much of a revolution. Organic sales have flattened, the economy's in the tank, and yet a bunch of us foodies are running around with our copies of The Omnivore's Dilemma. And it's true - sort of. Yes, we're all enthusiastic. Yes, it's a movement that's grown in the past few years. And yes, we love Michael Pollan. But I'd like to think we're more than that. We're more than a bunch of dreamers with crazy ideas about heirloom tomatoes who fail to realize that most people can't afford organics and organic can't feed the world.
First off, organic CAN feed the world. In fact, the UN recommends that Africa go organic to feed itself. In the NYT article, they quote the National Corn Growers Association saying that organics have lower yields and bla bla bla, but that doesn't make it true. Yet the NYT never refutes the claim.
Second of all, we DO get that it's hard for people to afford good food right now. And you know what? There's an entire side to our movement that the NYT article failed to mention: the food justice/community food security movement. For all of the people out there who are telling us to join Slow Food and buy $4/lb heirloom grapes, there are others who are working day and night to make sure that all people can eat well, not just the rich.
And the externalities? They matter. The article says:
Although some people argue that there are hidden costs to cheap food, from environmental damage caused by factory farms and fertilizer runoff to the health costs associated with eating highly processed, calorie-laden food, the fact remains that commercially produced food is relatively inexpensive.
"The idea of the true cost of food?" Mr. Hollender asks. "That's the last thing consumers want to hear right now."
Well you know what? If the people cannot afford to think about these things, then that's the government's job. And that's what the food movement has been trying to say.
|
|
Discuss
:: (19
Comments)
|
|
Sun Mar 22, 2009 at 04:51:38 AM PDT
|
- Mark Bittman shares a recipe for oven baked steel-cut oats. Yum! I'm trying this.
- Need more details about the new White House garden? How about a map and pics of the groundbreaking.
- I have a new goal for my food career. Check this out - tourists to Tuscany will pay big bucks for the privilege of cooking with Michael Pollan. Oh yeah, after my book becomes a New York Times bestseller (lol) I want to be invited as the celebrity guest to an Italian food resort!
- Natasha Chart reports on a super-sweet bill in the Montana state government that forces biotech companies to obtain a farmers' permission before sampling crops on their land. Nice! It's already passed the House... just has to get past the Senate now.
- Civil Eats features a fantastic piece on farming in Namibia.
- How Much Water Do You Really Use? This site rocks! Did you know it uses 37 gallons of water to make a cup of coffee, 33 for a soda, and only 9 for a cup of tea? But all that ain't nothin' compared to the 634 gallons required for a hamburger!
- A gardener describes her garden library. If you're looking for some good books on gardening, this might be the place to go for suggestions.
- Scientific American weighs in about MRSA on hog farms with their article "Our Sick Farms, Our Infected Food."
- Marion Nestle comments on Disney characters advertising food. I'm with her - let's keep our cartoons and our food separate. The last two pics in the post make a very clear point - Sponge Bob hawking baby carrots AND Burger King. If we're teaching our kids to choose the food that Sponge Bob eats, like carrots, does that mean that Burger King is good for you too?
- Wow! Slow Food and Michael Pollan met with the CDC! If only the freakin' House Ag Committee was so receptive to their message...
- Marion Nestle reports on the USDA's plan to test ground beef at packing plants 4 times a month (PDF). I like this idea... sort of. Four times a month seems pretty weak to me, considering the volume of ground beef one of these plants can make in a single day. I'd be very happy if the proposal was to test the meat 4 times a DAY instead.
- As if you didn't have enough to look for on food labels already, now you might start seeing a sustainable water certification. Nice idea, but why can't we just drink the stuff out of our taps?
|
|
Discuss
:: (11
Comments)
|
|
Wed Mar 18, 2009 at 12:00:00 PM PDT
|
|
I'm going on a new diet. I have ten new food rules that I will NOT follow. They come from the industry-funded front group Center for Consumer Freedom.
Recently, Michael Pollan asked readers for their food rules. I can give you my #1 rule easily: I won't eat anything if I can't identify a plant or an animal (preferably a plant) that it came from. And high fructose corn syrup doesn't count even though I know it came from corn. But CCF decided they would have a laugh and send THEIR food rules in to Michael Pollan. I've included them below, along with 9 other food rules of my own.
|
|
There's More...
:: (55
Comments, 567 words in story)
|
|
Mon Mar 16, 2009 at 02:01:13 AM PDT
|
Wow, talk about strange bedfellows. George Will and Michael Pollan? George Will, conservative hack, and Michael Pollan who is (in my opinion) one of the best thinkers and writers of our time? Yet, here is George Will, quoting, channeling, and praising Pollan:
Corn, which covers 125,000 square miles of America, about the size of New Mexico, fattens 100 million beef cattle, and at least that many bipeds. Much of the river of cheap corn becomes an ocean of high-fructose corn syrup, which by 1984 was sweetening Coke and Pepsi. Disposing of the corn also requires passing it through animals' stomachs. Corn, together with pharmaceuticals and other chemicals -- a Pollan axiom: "You are what what you eat eats, too" -- has made it profitable to fatten cattle on feedlots rather than grass, cutting by up to 75 percent the time from birth to slaughter. Eating corn nourished by petroleum-based fertilizers, a beef cow consumes almost a barrel of oil in its lifetime.
Well, I'm glad George Will has good reading material, at least. I'll be interested to see what kind of conservative spin he might put on this in the future.
|
|
Discuss
:: (2
Comments)
|
|
Thu Feb 19, 2009 at 14:15:18 PM PST
|
|
Earlier I posted about a few Center for Consumer Freedom op eds. They were both published in a paper I hadn't heard of, and I figured maybe they were friendly with that paper. Maybe it was a paper of approximately the same journalistic stature as the Talon News, the right wing site where Jeff Gannon (former male hooker turned White House correspondent) worked. But then I discovered something new. The Chicago Tribune printed an identical op ed by the Center for Consumer Freedom: Gourmet Activists: Food For Thought.
There are two important things a reader of this op end should know. One is the background of the Center for Consumer Freedom. Once you know that, the "facts" cited in the op ed are almost secondary, but just for the sake of setting the record straight, the second are the real facts and how they stack up against the fake ones that CCF likes to use.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 1223 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jan 29, 2009 at 15:18:41 PM PST
|
Wes Jackson and Wendell Barry are both dropping by Food Chain Radio this Saturday at 9am (also available for podcast afterward) to discuss their idea for a 50-year farm bill. They've already expressed this in a NY Times op ed. They say:
We... need a national agricultural policy that is based upon ecological principles. We need a 50-year farm bill that addresses forthrightly the problems of soil loss and degradation, toxic pollution, fossil-fuel dependency and the destruction of rural communities.
Somehow I think making a farm bill last 10 times longer is far less important than the other changes they call for - making our ag policy actually address the problems we face.
And as long as we're talking about podcasts of foodie heroes, how about a little Michael Pollan for dessert?
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Sat Jan 03, 2009 at 14:39:23 PM PST
|
|
One of my favorite bloggers, authors, and radio show hosts, Bill Scher, has been on a roll lately. Bill blogs at Liberal Oasis and Campaign for America's Future and he is the author of Wait! Don't Move to Canada. In my experience, he's also an incredibly brilliant observer of American politics, and this week I shot him an email to say that I thought he was being particularly brilliant. First, he talked about the need to get lies debunked before it's too late (in the case of the auto industry bailout - but this lesson is equally true with many food issues) on his show last week. Then on Rachel Maddow's show this week he said that we need to be proactive with Barack Obama - it's OK to be critical of him, preferably BEFORE a bad decision is made and it's too late - but then we need to remember to praise Obama loudly when he does a good job too. Thank you Bill!!! I quite agree!!
Anyway, when I sent Bill an email, he replied by suggesting we talk on his radio show this week about the Vilsack pick. Bill may not be exclusively devoted to the issue of food like I am, but he was astute to pick up on the same idea that both Michael Pollan and John Nichols alluded to... it's a BIG DEAL that the Sec of Ag pick has stirred up so much controversy among non-farmers!
So here's the radio show, in three flavors:
MP3
RSS feed
iTunes
I also should have mentioned the 60,000+ people who have petitioned Obama to pick a friend of sustainable food for Sec of Ag, and now for any of the under secretary positions at USDA. It's not too late to sign the petition - please head over there and sign if you haven't yet.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 09:49:08 AM PST
|
|
As an Iowan, David Murphy doesn't take campaign promises lightly. Iowa alone may be responsible for Barack Obama's ultimate ascendancy to the White House by giving him a big win in their caucuses, and now Dave wants to see those promises carried out. In many ways, he's still looking for "change he can believe in." He's tired of seeing his state overrun and polluted by factory hog farms, and he's sick of his state's soil misused to grow monoculture crops - the raw materials of processed foods - which degrade the health of the soil and force Iowans who want to eat real food to import it even though they live in one of the top agricultural states.
What makes David unique from so many other Americans who believed in Obama's message of change is that he started a grassroots petition that made it all the way to the New York Times, and now Obama's transition team is taking notice. He's managed to get sign-ons from ALL (literally) of the top names in sustainable food, including NYT bestselling author and columnist Michael Pollan (who is so popular that he can even count Barack Obama among his fans!).
First, sign the petition and then read the interviews below - including statements from Eric Schlosser and Marion Nestle!
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1751 words in story)
|
|
Thu Dec 11, 2008 at 13:22:07 PM PST
|
(Thanks for posting this here, Teacherken! - promoted by Jill Richardson)
crossposted from dailykos at the request of orangeclouds115
Somehow I feel as if someone else should be writing this, but I am still up. And when I read a column that begins As Barack Obama ponders whom to pick as agriculture secretary, he should reframe the question. What he needs is actually a bold reformer in a position renamed "secretary of food." I feel as if Orangeclouds115 has successfully indoctrinated me, and I am wondering if the author of this piece Nicholas Kristof, has read her.
But he doesn't have to. Nicholas Kristof grew up on a farm. And he has read, and talked with, key figures, such as Michael Pollan.
if you want, you can just go read Kristof and ignore me. Or you can continue below the fold while I try to further entice you to read him, and - uh oh - offer a few additional thoughts of my own? Really? On food? You betcha.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 719 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|