|
Frances Moore Lappe
Tue Apr 21, 2009 at 03:05:32 AM PDT
|
|
Frances Moore Lappe gave a speech a few months ago in Alberta, Canada and it's available in a free podcast. She's every bit as captivating as she was in 1971 - or, in my opinion, more so. The podcast is about an hour long and part of me wants to write it up but really, you should treat yourself to listening to this fantastic speech. Maybe while soaking in a hot bath, because it's really something to savor and enjoy.
She begins with a basic premise: That the world grows enough to feed everybody and yet many people go hungry. And - as I have been shouting about on this blog - she points out the inaccurate frame we often use to look at hunger: scarcity. And as long as we're focused on scarcity, the answer will always be "grow more." But what happens when we recognize that we already HAVE enough and the solution to hunger is already fully within our grasp? Well... the Powers That Be don't like to talk about that. Because it means they'll have to share.
As Frances Moore Lappe points out, we are each capable of atrocities like those committed at Abu Ghraib, and we are also capable of empathy and sharing! In fact, she said, the parts of our brain that our active while we cooperate with others are similar to those active while we eat chocolate. So if cooperating is as pleasing to us as eating chocolate, how do we set up our society in a way to engage THAT part of our brain instead of the selfish, miserly parts of us that don't mind letting others starve?
|
|
Discuss
:: (12
Comments)
|
|
Wed Mar 18, 2009 at 10:00:00 AM PDT
|
|
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Sat Nov 22, 2008 at 09:38:30 AM PST
|
|
A new USDA report on hunger just came out - but unfortunately, they don't even show the full extent of the problem. The numbers are from 2007, pre-economic-shit-hitting-fan.
Overall, 11.1% of Americans lived in "food insecure" households during 2007. That is 36.2 million people, or a little less than the entire population of California. Can you imagine? An entire California of hungry people? The government calls that number "essentially unchanged" from 2006 but in reality even if the percentage change is low, it means there are an additional 700,000 people who were food insecure in 2007.
Of those "food insecure" households, over one third have "very low food security" - which I believe, translated into English, means HUNGRY. We're close enough to Thanksgiving that Sarah Palin is doing photo ops next to turkey executions, so I think now is a good time to talk about the state of hunger in America.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 2689 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|