|
Dick Lugar 
Thu Apr 22, 2010 at 13:25:29 PM PDT
|
|
Today the Senate Foreign Relations committee held a hearing on the Global Food Security Act (S.384), which, as I have documented on this blog before, Monsanto HAS been involved in lobbying on. The bill first came to my attention about a year ago, when the same committee held a very similar hearing about the same bill. In the year since then, I've become increasingly knowledgeable and outraged about the issues surrounding global food security. In the meantime, the Obama Administration took the lead on the issue of global food security from the Senate, and USAID is doing quite a bit already (in partnership with the World Bank and private organizations and companies) to really f*ck things up worldwide.
One of the clauses in the bill specifies that the U.S. should promote biotechnology in its efforts to combat global hunger. After a year of lobbying to ask them to remove this, they still haven't. Lugar made a point today in saying how necessary he thought GMOs are. My very inadequate transcription of his remarks are as follows:
The average African farmer's yield per acre is 1/2 that of an Indian farmer, 1/4 that of a Chinese farmer, and 1/5 of an American. [Something about Bill Gates' piece in the Wall Street Journal today] The role of GMOs in agriculture development is a matter of contention. Europe's rejection of GM has pressured African governments for fear they will lose export markets. Others argue safety is not proven despite 2 decades of safe use of GMOs. This ensures that much of the continent [Africa] will lack the tools to deal with changing climate in the long run. We may not be able to double food output by 2050. I ask to what extent does USAID support a full range of technologies? To what extent do the strategies encourage biotech?
Here's the thing. The "double food output by 2050" figure is one that was created by idiots. Or just very greedy assholes. It assumes that the rest of the world will want to eat much more grain-fed meat (like Americans do now). Unfortunately, Mother Nature does not operate like a market with supply and demand. A diet of grain-fed meat means increased diet-related chronic illnesses for those who eat it. And it means continued and worsened environmental degradation and climate change for the planet. Our species existence on this planet is contingent on us NOT increasing grain-fed meat consumption (and in fact, on DECREASING it). Therefore, the Senate, USAID, and Bill Gates are all aiming for a false goal.
More below.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 958 words in story)
|
|
Wed Apr 01, 2009 at 09:37:08 AM PDT
|
|
Yesterday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously approved S.384 The Global Food Security Act of 2009, which was sponsored by Dick Lugar (R-IN), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Bob Casey (D-PA). In my view, this is not good news. The bill specifies that the U.S. MUST fund GMOs and biotechnology. Additionally, the hearing about the bill was so heinous that the bill's intent is crystal clear - and it's not good.
UPDATE: In light of some of the very funny foodie April Fools jokes going around, I would like to clarify that this post is NOT an April Fools.
UPDATE #2: Elanor Starmer on The Ethicurean weighs in on this issue here. I recommend you check it out!
|
|
There's More...
:: (8
Comments, 1086 words in story)
|
|
Wed Mar 25, 2009 at 08:00:00 AM PDT
|
|
Dick is a 6th term Republican Senator from Indiana who won his 2006 election with 87% of the vote. He was born in Indianapolis on April 4, 1932. He's a Methodist, and his highest degree was an MA from Oxford in 1956. He served in the US Navy from 1957-1960. His wife's name is Charlene.
Lugar is on the Ag committee and he's the ranking member of the Foreign Relations committee. In addition to his obvious influence in food issues on the ag committee, the foreign relations committee makes decisions about U.S. food aid to other countries.
Lugar is an odd bird when it comes to ag policy. He was raised on a 600 acre farm and he boasts that he saw yields triple in his lifetime using agricultural chemicals and GMOs. He also feels that wildlife flourishes on his farm and that proves as justification that chemical ag does no harm to the environment. He stands for a lot of things I'm against, but he also manages to piss off groups that I strongly oppose like the Farm Bureau. So - the enemy of the enemy is...??? In this case, I don't think he's my friend.
Contact Information
DC Office: 202-224-5623 (phone); 202-228-1377 (fax)
District offices: 317-554-0750 (Indianapolis); 812-465-6500 (Jeffersonville); 260-422-1505 (Ft. Wayne); 219-548-8035 (Valparaiso); 812-465-6313 (Evansville)
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 991 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|
