Last week Yoplait announced its decision to go rbGH-free. This week, the papers are full of articles proclaiming the news. Here's what the cat Google alert dragged in this morning:
Consumer Demand, Not Safety, Led General Mills to Ditch rbGH - This article does not make the claim that rbGH is actually safe - it just says that General Mills did not take sides on the safety of the product. Its decision was based on marketing.
The article's author has her own opinion:
Are artificial hormones actually unsafe? I won't pretend to be qualified to answer that question. There are studies and scientists supporting both sides of the issue (though when it comes to possible but unproven cancer links, my personal instinct is to err on the side of caution).
However, regardless of whether or not the artificial hormones are potentially risky for humans, there is a general agreement that they're bad for cows. Cows taking the hormones get more udder infections - and when cows get sick, farmers give them antibiotics, "the residues of which also may end up in milk and dairy products," as the Center for Food Safety explains.
These residues can cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals and contribute to the growth of antibiotic resistant bacteria, further undermining the efficacy of some antibiotics in fighting human infections.
To me, the whole thing sounds like a pretty bad idea. But it also seems pretty unlikely that the FDA will change its rules on rBGH any time soon. Instead, I predict we'll see more even more companies deciding, like GM, to cater to the common consumer perception that injecting cows with artificial hormones is, at the very least, kind of creepy.
More below...
|
