Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Peanut Butter Spurs John Dingell To Action

by: Jill Richardson

Fri Jan 30, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM PST


Bookmark and Share
In light of the recent peanut butter salmonella outbreak, Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) introduced a new bill - H.R.759, the Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act. The text of the bill is not online yet, but Obama Foodorama reports:

In response to the Peanut Butter contamination, the House of Representatives jumped in to action yesterday, and introduced a new Bill that amps up frequency and scope of FDA inspections, but requires Industry to cover the costs.

The Food and Drug Adminsitration Globzlization Act [sic], introduced By Congressman John Dingell (D-MI), and lauded by Democrats on the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee - would require food companies to be inspected at least once every four years, and drug companies at least every two. Inspections once every four years? That'll solve food and drug safety problems!

Hmm... I detect some sarcasm there. The plant that caused the salmonella outbreak was inspected twice in the last decade - in 2001 and in 2006. Once every 4 years is better than that, at least. So far this bill has 2 cosponsors and it has been referred to the committee on Energy and Commerce. Independent of this bill, the committee will also hold oversight hearings on the salmonella outbreak in February.

Peanut butter recall update below.

Jill Richardson :: Peanut Butter Spurs John Dingell To Action
The peanut butter recall is about to get MUCH BIGGER. The list below is only the newly recalled items on the FDA's list since January 28. For foods recalled Jan 22-28, go here. For foods called before then, go here.

Newly recalled consumer products include:

  • Uncle Eddies Vegan Peanut Butter Chocolate-Chip Cookies
  • Shoppers Valu Multi-Flavored Dog Biscuits

But that's not why the recall is getting bigger. It's getting bigger because Peanut Corporation has expanded its recall to include ALL: Peanut butter, Peanut paste, Peanut meal, Peanut granules, and Peanuts (lot #s beginning in 7,8, or 9). THOSE products went as ingredients to the food companies you or I buy from at the store. The next step will be those companies expanding THEIR recalls.

So far Hy-Vee and Wells Dairy have announced further recalls:

Hy-Vee Inc. is recalling freshly made party mix and peanut brittle because the products contain whole peanuts that are potentially contaminated with salmonella.

Separately, Wells' Dairy Inc. announced it was recalling Blue Bunny No Sugar Added Reduced Fat Bunny Tracks Ice Cream with best used by dates before Jan. 29, 2010, and Blue Bunny Personals Bunny Tracks with lot number 80024 and that have a best used by date of Sept. 11, 2009.

And Publix grocery store announced a recall:

Publix announced Thursday it is recalling boxes of its store-brand Round Top Sundae Cones because they are topped with chopped peanuts from the Peanut Corp. of America, which has been linked to a nationwide salmonella outbreak.

I'll continue to update this site as more news emerges.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Inspections once every two or four years is ludicrous, might as well shut down (4.00 / 3)
digestive systems now and be done with it! Food processors SHOULD do internal tests once a week and present them to a gov database via a network to be read and analyzed by experts, won't cost much and should be mandatory. Anything else is a joke, as we've seen recently. End of story.

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



PCA tested for positive for salmonella and shipped anyway (4.00 / 3)
Some internal testing would be great -- I mean, wouldn't it be swell if the feds allowed beef producers to test for Mad Cow??

But internal tests won't solve the problem. It's not like the Peanut Corporation of America didn't test itself, after all. In fact, they internally tested 12 times (I believe) since 2007, found salmonella, retested, got a negative result, and then shipped anway. In each instance.

The FDA report

http://www.fda.gov/ora/frequen...

It's hard to get around the conclusion that we need more inspectors in the manufacturers plants, and far more frequently.

We won't throw the first punch, but...okay, maybe we'll throw the first punch.


[ Parent ]
I know this, but the tests were never sent to the FDA or anyone else for checking. (4.00 / 3)
You will not get more inspections chiefly because it's an expensive method, takes time to implement nationally (there are hundred of thousands food factories in the US alone) AND not enough people are trained to do this job properly, when regular in-house tests can achieve food safety at the producers cost. What's not to like in this plan? Can you come up with a better one albeit one that is economically pragmatic in this downturn?

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



[ Parent ]
Couldn't we also... (4.00 / 3)
train more inspectors (creating jobs...), and set off at least some of the cost by instituting a fee of some sort on the food companies?  Doing that in conjunction with some sort of centralized self-reporting system, as you mention?  

How many inspectors are there now?  I have no clue, but I'm sure the numbers have been dropping for years with Republicans starving the agencies for funds over the past decade-plus.  But if say it's one inspection every 3 years on average now - triple (or more) the number of inspectors (which for all I know might even just be returning them to the numbers they once had), and then we get at least one comprehensive inspection a year at each facility.  That would be a decent start at least...

I mean, we've just thrown billions and billions at a bunch of con artists and degenerate gamblers who brought down the world financial system...I think we can find a few dollars in 'stimulus money' to actually do something useful for society.

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens


[ Parent ]
Yes, but I fear it will fall on deaf ears. (4.00 / 3)
Weekly tests done by processors and sent to FDA via computer can be incredibly successful and stop the cheats. You're never going to get inspections on a monthly basis...let alone on a weekly one, and food manufacturers need to be strict. Also random inspection work, as long as they don't announce themselves as they usually do. I've looked at this for some time now and I think this is one solution that can help.  

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



[ Parent ]
I meant (4.00 / 3)
food manufacturers need to be strict
ly kept in check!

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



[ Parent ]
also i think (4.00 / 2)
independent labs should be required to send ALL results to FDA. imagine if that had happened with PCA....

& THAt can be a basis for licensing the labs (in-house OR independant) & accepting lab reports. if labs don't send in reports, they're not licensed, if food processing doesn't have in-house inspection or independant Licensed lab report, they get fined AND the fed inspectors come & inspect the entire facility.

come firefly-dreaming with me....


[ Parent ]
train more inspectors? (4.00 / 3)
sure. but let's fund the FDA too. One of the corporate tactics at play here is lobbying Congress to starve the FDA of funding to keep it from doing regulatory functions they don't like.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Oh, absolutely... (4.00 / 3)
Totally agree on that.

In the above comment, I was just focusing on that one aspect (training more inspectors) of the equation.  Partly because I'd like the job myself, heh...

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens


[ Parent ]
I think you're plan is terrific, AAF, for day-in day-out monitoring. (4.00 / 4)
I do! But I don't think it's going to much to stop outbreaks.

The corporate food chain is broken. Absolutely dysfunctional. So, yeah, it's gonna take some money and political will to make it safe, and inspectors, charged by agencies with regulatory teeth, must be part of the strategy.

That, or we decentralize the food system into smaller, more local, and regional parts.

Or introduce irradiation against the public's will.

But if people want a national system, they better be prepared to pay some money to protect themselves from its dangers.

We won't throw the first punch, but...okay, maybe we'll throw the first punch.


[ Parent ]
I like what jgoodman says about (4.00 / 2)
irradiation: if you give me food that has been irradiated, that says to me that there is shit in it.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
exactly! (4.00 / 3)
(And I hope my comment about irradiation was not seen as an endorsement.)

We won't throw the first punch, but...okay, maybe we'll throw the first punch.

[ Parent ]
Listen, I happen to know someone in the top echelon (family member) at (4.00 / 3)
the French DoD. They can read underground nuclear testings via their own network, and quite accurately. They have a foolproof system in place and can read all kinds of tests from their consoles. It can be done with the food supply, in fact, I think it's probably the only recourse FDA will have in the future at comparatively low costs. I'd love to think that the food supply chain could be decentralized but it will never happen. Yes, train more inspectors but that's not the future, a centralized network system is, my 2 cents.

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



[ Parent ]
and part of the problem (4.00 / 2)
is also that they were looking for labs to give them negative results. If you're not interested in ACTUALLY discovering potential problems what's the point of testing?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Retesting to get the results you want (4.00 / 3)
is going to get them in serious trouble.

This is where your comment below comes in, Jill. If PCA were actually afraid of gaming the system (beyond, you know, the fear of killing 6 people) maybe they would have been compelled to clean up their act long ago.

We won't throw the first punch, but...okay, maybe we'll throw the first punch.


[ Parent ]
The lab shopping... (4.00 / 3)
was very disturbing.  And I hope we find out more on that soon - that company is just as much on the hook for this as PCA.  

If that outside lab falsified results, a criminal investigation and lawsuits are warranted.  If they were just colossally incompetent, they need to be de-certified and also face lawsuits as well.

I started out working in environmental remediation in the field services division of a small independent laboratory in NJ a year out of high school.  A few years later we were bought out by a bigger company, who then sold out to an even bigger company just before I left and moved here to Oregon...but no matter what our name was at any given time, the one thing they all always had in common was constant reinforcement to everybody in the company, how vital our job was to the public health.  If we gave a go on soil or groundwater samples that would later put people in harm's way, that was on us.

People are gonna make mistakes occasionally, it's inevitable.  We have to make sure of course to institute a system that minimizes the damage done by said mistakes.  But you don't make mistakes 12 times.  That's called a criminal conspiracy, in my book...

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens


[ Parent ]
what do they do in the EU? (4.00 / 2)
and does it work?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
It's centralized in Brussels, under the EU watch. (4.00 / 3)
Mandatory testings are done regularly and sent to a database.  

Sic Transit Gloria Locavore!



[ Parent ]
here's my thought: (4.00 / 2)
there's no reasonable amount of govt inspection that can be efficient and effective. Yes, they should go check the place out regularly, but no that won't fix the problem alone. We need to make it SO costly to a plant to poison its customers that it wouldn't dare do that. And we need to enforce it at every step of the supply chain so that EACH of PCA's customers would have been testing instead of just assuming the peanut butter was OK. None of this "tort reform" bullshit. Consumers need to be able to sue. Only when industry is afraid of getting sued will they shape it up.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
it boils down to (4.00 / 2)
take away corporate rights
they are NOT citizens & should not have those rights.
it's time for corporate america to become accountable for it's actions.

come firefly-dreaming with me....

[ Parent ]
Oh? (4.00 / 3)
Now THAT's unAmerican in the extreme! ;-) [Snark! Snark!]

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox