Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Finally Revealed: Processed Food Rebates Dominate School Cafeterias

by: euclidarms

Tue Oct 18, 2011 at 04:37:34 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
( - promoted by Jill Richardson)

By Ed Bruske
aka The Slow Cook

When I first started writing about the food being served in my daughter's elementary school cafeteria, I figured there had to be a reason children were being fed Apple Jacks cereal, strawberry milk, Pop-Tarts, Giant Goldfish Grahams and Otis Spunkmeyer muffins for breakfast.

I was right. The manufacturers of those sugar-laden products pay hefty rebates--some call them "kickbacks"--to giant food service companies as an inducement to purchase their highly processed goods. But I have now learned it's not just the lousy food that's fueled by rebates. Just about everything that goes into running a public school cafeteria comes with a rebate check that helps make sure the industrial version of food wins out.

In what may be the first ever detailed look into how industry rebates dominate school food service, documents I obtained under the Freedom of Information Act indicate that more than 100 companies paid rebates in recent years to the food service management company hired by D.C. Public Schools--Chartwells--for everything from breakfast cereal, hamburger patties and canned green beans to paper cups, armored car services and drug counseling for employees.

euclidarms :: Finally Revealed: Processed Food Rebates Dominate School Cafeterias
Far and away the biggest contributor to the rebate dollars collected by Chartwells was a company I had never heard of, but one that apparently plays an oversized roll in feeding our city's children--Performance Food Group. According to an itemization released by D.C. Public Schools, Performance Food Group paid more than $400,000 in rebates for goods and services supplied to the city's schools over the last three years.

Based in Richmond, Va., Performance Food Group claims to be "one of the nation's largest foodservice distributors" with multiple brands and more than 1,000 products aimed not only at schools and restaurants but "every kind of eatery from coast to coast." The company has operations in 29 states, "from our distribution warehouses in Tennessee, to our seafood facility in Miami, to our cheese processing facility in Minnesota." It employees 10,000 workers just to transport all of its goods, and its trucks "log millions of miles each year," according to the company's website.

Second on the list of biggest rebate providers in D.C. schools is General Mills, the cereal maker, at $41,218, followed by Kraft, supplier of mayonnaise and salad dressings at $36,165, and Country Pure Foods-Ardmore Farms, manufacturer of fruit juices, at $34.991. The list includes many of the nation's top industrial food processors, such as Kellogg's ($20,717), ConAgra ($25,030) and Tyson ($15,792), as well as frozen pizza giant Schwan's ($24.561) and muffin maker Otis Spunkmeyer ($21,377).

Manufacturers pay rebates based on large volume purchases--literally, cash for placing an order. Rebates are said to be worth billions of dollars to the nation's food industry, although manufacturers as well as the food service companies who feed millions of the nation's school children every day--Chartwells, Sodexo and Aramark--treat them as a closely-guarded secret.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture requires that food service companies engaged in "cost reimbursable" contracts with schools credit any rebates they receive to their school clients. For more than a year, attorneys for D.C. Public Schools refused to make public an itemized list of rebates collected by Chartwells, claiming the information constituted "trade secrets." The schools were overruled by Mayor Vincent Gray's legal counsel after I filed an administrative appeal.

John Carroll, an assistant New York State attorney general investigating rebating practices there, has said rebates pose "an inherent conflict of interest" in school feeding programs because they favor highly processed industrial foods. In cases where schools pay a food service company a flat rate to provide meals, the companies are not required to disclose the rebates they collect. In those cases, Carroll recently told a U.S. Senate Panel, rebates tend to drive up the cost of food, cheating children out of nutrition they might otherwise have on their lunch trays.

Carroll also described cases where rebates discouraged the use of local farm products in school meals. Produce vendors can't afford to pay a rebate for local apples. But in at least one case, a produce distributor raised the prices of his goods so that he could pay a rebate to a food service company.

A Homeland Security sub-committee in the U.S. Senate is investigating possible rebate fraud in contracts across the entire federal government.

Here in the District of Columbia, children were being fed meals manufactured in a suburban factory until Chartwells in the fall of 2009 introduced something it called "fresh cooked." As I discovered while spending a week in the kitchen at my daughter's elementary school, what that entailed was reheating pre-fabricated meal components such as chicken nuggets and tater tots. For breakfast, children were often consuming up to 15 teaspoons of sugar in the form of processed cereals, flavored milk, cookies and muffins.

Around that same time, D.C. Public Schools hired a new food services director, Jeffrey Mills, who scoured the entire Chartwells menu item-by-item, removing the flavored milk and processed treats and replacing many of the familiar re-heated lunch items. Funds allocated by a "Healthy Schools Act" approved by the D.C. Council helped pay for fresh local fruits and vegetables. But Mills said he sometimes encountered stiff resistance from the local Chartwells manager because the products Mills wanted to serve were not on Chartwell "preferred" product list.

According to Carroll, site managers for food service companies face punishment from their employers if they deviate from products that pay the biggest rebates. Rebates are extremely lucrative, since they generate revenue that requires virtually no labor. Some products trigger rebates of up to 50 percent of their listed value. And while USDA regulations require that rebates be credited to schools with "cost reimbursable" contracts, it is believed that the big food service companies have found ways to profit from them nonetheless.

For instance, it is speculated that manufacturers offer stepped-up rebates for very large purchase orders. Thus, while a single school district may only be entitled to 10 percent worth of rebates on its share of breakfast cereal, an order for cereal covering multiple school districts might trigger a rebate of, say, 20 percent. The food service company would simply pocket the difference.

Chartwells manages food service in more than 500 school districts across the country. The products it uses are supplied by a sister company called Foodbuy, whose employees concern themselves entirely with writing huge contracts with food manufacturers and collecting the rebates on behalf of their parent company, Compass Group, based in Great Britain. Compass group, which owns numerous food service operations in this country--including Chartwells, Bon Appetit, Restaurant Associates, and Wolfgang Puck Catering--claimed some $22 billion in sales in its most recent annual report.

In July of last year, I disclosed that Chartwells had collected more than $1 million in rebates and discounts during its first 18 months of operation in D.C. schools. Subsequently, the schools acknowledged that they had been waiting nine months for Chartwells to make good on a request to produce an itemized accounting of where those rebates came from.

I can now pass along a list of most of the companies involved, compiled from hundreds of data entries contained in the documents obtained from D.C. Public Schools, representing rebates reported by Chartwells since fall 2008. Some of the companies cited in the documents could not be positively identified.

$ 415,051.41 Performance Food Group: food and food service products

$ 41,218.07 General Mills: breakfast cereals

$ 36,165.78 Kraft General Foods: salad dressings, condiments

$ 34,991.20 Country Pure Foods-Ardmore Farms: fruit juices

$ 32,839.50 Jenny-O Turkey Store: processed turkey products

$ 29,075.44 Allen Canning: canned vegetables

$ 25,030.91 ConAgra: prepared foods

$ 24,561.45 Schwan's: frozen pizza

$ 21,377.88 Otis Spunkmeyer: muffins

$ 20,717.38 Kellogg's: breakfast cereal

$ 20,628.47 Ecolab: kitchen sanitation services

$ 19,002.03 Pilgrim's: chicken products

$ 15,792.67 Tyson: chicken products

$ 13,682.74 Keany Produce: fruits and vegetables

$ 16,583.00 Ford Motor Co.: vehicles

$ 15,011.72 Supply America: food service supplies and equipment

$ 14,324.32 Frito Lay: chips and snacks

$ 13,974.08 JAFCO Foods: breaded chicken

$ 9,959.46 Butensky Services: refrigeration repair

$ 9,830.65 Simplot Food Group: frozen potato products

$ 9,509.46 Smithfield Packing: ham, hot dogs

$ 9,153.11 Pactiv: plastic food packaging

$ 8,226,89 Atlantic Mills: kitchen wipes, aprons

$ 8,056.00 VF Solutions: uniforms

$ 7,344.53 Heinz: ketchup

$ 7,308.33 Dunbar Armored: armored car services

$ 6,727.56 Pinnacle Foods: syrup, pickles, barbecue sauce

$ 6,591.27 Unilever Food Solutions: dressings, sauces, seasonings

$ 6,578.11 Michael Foods: frozen egg products

$ 6,193.99 Coca-Cola: soft drinks, bottled water

$ 5,953.75 Automotive Rentals: vehicle rental

$ 5,680.97 Great Lakes Cheese: cheese products

$ 5,195.30 Mission Foods/Gruma: tortillas

$ 5,152.21 Office Max: office products

$ 4,718.02 McCormick & Co.: spices

$ 4,678.79 Cadbury: chocolate

$ 4,388.70 Cargill Meat Solutions: processed beef

$ 4,368.03 National Paper & Plastic: plastic cutlery, disposables

$ 3,679.00 Network: undetermined

$ 3,571.05 Osborne Co.: undetermined

$ 3,239.65 Sara Lee Bakery: bread, baked goods

$ 3,200.00 Rush Truck Center: trucks

$ 2,882.68 Produce Source Partners: produce, cut fruits and vegetables

$ 2,604.29 Nestle: frozen prepared foods

$ 2,587.67 REMA Foods: canned, frozen and packaged commodity foods

$ 2,516.04 Georgia Pacific-Dixie Foodservice: disposable cups, plates

$ 2,571.30 Tropical Paradise Inc.: frozen fruit slush

$ 1,992.46 Dr. Pepper/7-Up: soft drinks, bottled water, Snapple

$ 1,970.99 Advanced Food Company: Philly steakds, bugers, fajita strips

$ 1,917.71 Schreiber Foods: processed cheese

$ 1,770.04 Hormel: processed meats

$ 1,604.00 MegaMex Foods: salsa, canned jalapeno peppers, refried beans

$ 1,317.36 Lamb Weston: potato products

$ 1,305.25 Campbell's Foodservice: Pepperidge Farm Goldfish, Giant Goldfish Grahams

$ 1,274.61 Anchor Packaging: plastic food containers

$ 1,219.00 Fabri-kal Corp.: plastic food containers

$ 1,250.20 Iceland Seafood Corp.: frozen fish

$ 1,210.00 Sara Lee Meats-Jimmy Dean: breakfast sausage

$ 1,112.30 Rich Products: frozen foods

$ 963.95 WinCup: Styrofoam cups

$ 913.80 Colavita: olive oil

$ 853.41 Masterfoods-Uncle Ben's: instant rice

$ 810.25 Ventura Foods-Sunnyland: oils, shortenings, pan coatings

$ 683.94 Verizon Wireless: communications

$ 579.46 First Advantage Occupational Health Services: drug screening, substance abuse assistance

$ 564.24 Schwan's Bakery: undetermined

$ 539.80 Goodman Foods: undetermined

$ 531.57 Gehl's Guernsey Farms: cheese sauces

$ 494.54 Bon Chef: food presentation equipment

$ 401.65 Jet Plastica: plastic cutlery, straws

$ 400.80 Smucker's: jams, jellies

$ 400.00 Mickey Truck Bodies: specialty delivery trucks

$ 398.00 Ken's Foods Inc.: salad dressings

$ 368.75 Wholesome & Hearty Food: vegetarian burgers

$ 314.89 Handi Foil: disposable aluminum containers

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

PFG offerings (0.00 / 0)
From the diary:

Performance Food Group claims to be "one of the nation's largest foodservice distributors" with multiple brands and more than 1,000 products aimed not only at schools and restaurants but "every kind of eatery from coast to coast."

From a PFG website:

Our Company

Our 18 broadline distribution companies operate throughout the country, from Maine to Miami, and the Atlantic to the Pacific. We distribute a broad array of more than 68,000 national and proprietary brand food and related products such as baked goods, seafood, the choicest cuts of USDA meats, and even condiments and cleaning supplies.



milk money (0.00 / 0)
From Ed's previous diaries, we know a local dairy, Cloverland Dairy, supplied milk to D.C. schools during the period covered by the present report. If Ed supplied details of how milk got from Cloverland to a D.C. school, I don't remember them. D.C. schools might have bought milk directly from Cloverland, and perhaps Cloverland doesn't appear on this kickback list because the list is only for rebates credited to D.C. schools from Chartwells.

Maybe that isn't what happened, however. Although milk might physically have come directly to The District from a Cloverland facility, paperwork might show that the school district "bought" the milk from Chartwells, and perhaps Chartwells "bought" the milk from Performance Food Group, which might have "bought" the milk from Cloverland.

My idea is purely speculative, but it's intriguing. In this thought experiment, PFG would list a transaction showing milk purchased from Cloverland. Cloverland would pay a kickback to PFG, presumably. PFG would mark up the purchase, sell the milk on to Chartwells, and pay Chartwells a kickback. Chartwells would mark up the milk again and, at least in the paperwork, sell it on again, this time to D.C. schools. Eventually, after a lucrative float period, Chartwells would credit a portion of the kickback from PFG to the D.C. school district.

Nah. Say it ain't so.


markup (0.00 / 0)
When a product is marked up, I assume the list cost of the product is the markup basis, not the cost of the product after kickbacks.

[ Parent ]
I would think so (4.00 / 1)
if I know I'm going to give a kickback, then that will be a part of the markup.

Although it's interesting how many hands that milk may pass through before it gets to the school, I can see the logic in the distribution chain. Working with a distributor myself, I can see the advantages both for myself and for the restaurant. I can also see the advantages for the distributor.

PFG would be a distributor.  If you compared their chain to mine to find similarities, I would be Cloverdale, PFG would be my distributor, Chartwells would be the restaurant and the school district/kids would be the restaurant's customers.

The only differece (aside from scale) is that I don't give kickbacks. And, fortunately for me, my product prices aren't tied to a bulk price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Although I do have to price competetively with other produce growers in my area.

This whole rebate or kickback thing is goofy. In order to make any (or at least much) money on a product, the farm or other supplier/producer needs to add enough onto the price of their product to cover the rebate. (I'm going to start calling it a rebate because it's really not any different in practice than the rebate that's offered on products sold to private individuals, the big difference is that the companies working in these chains only shop where they can get rebates, kind of like some people I've known who only shop with coupons.) Everyone's got to be making money on float from the rebates as well as the difference between the rebate that PFG gets and the one it passes on to Chartwells. I wouldn't be surprised if the rebate PFG gives to Chartwells is smaller than the one that PFG gets from the farmer. I wonder if PFG drags their feet like Chartwells has. Or if they're operating on a net 30 or longer payment schedule. Isually it's around 30, at least that's been my experience.

However, when you get to working through more than one customer, the wait (and the float) can get longer. I did some work on a federal building for the General Services Administration back in 2001-2002. I didn't work directly for the GSA (although I had to go through all the federal background checks). GSA hired a general contractor to screen subcontractors, coordinate the work (there was more going on that what I was doing), bill, etc. The general had a billing cycle, and the GSA had a billing cycle. The general contactor's billing cycle ended before the GSA one did. We'd submit our bills to the general, who in turn would add their markup if any, and bill the GSA. Then the flow would reverse for payment. The General would get their payment prior to us being paid with a period to ensure that the check cleared, which was 1 or 2 weeks. The reason given was that these were large sums of money, and it takes a certain ammount of time for the checks to be processed and clear the banks. The reality is that it's a government check. Even if it's a huge check, it's going to clear quickly and sit in someone's account even if it's only for a week or two, and draw interest.

Some contractors have a way bigger float though. I remember when my dad was bidding and running jobs for a big contractor in Portland. Some of the big generals had a 30 day float, and we're talking millions and millions of dollars here. Even at a low interest rate, you can make a lot of money even on a 30 day float.


Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox