Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Philippines Diaries, Day 3, Part 3 - The Bioethanol Plant

by: Jill Richardson

Mon Jun 13, 2011 at 05:34:14 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
I was recently part of an International Fact Finding Mission to the Philippines. Our group investigated the impact of a biethanol project that uses sugarcane as its feedstock on the local environment, food security, land grabbing, and human rights. This diary covers the May 31, 2011 visit to the bioethanol plant, which is currently under construction.

You can see previous diaries here:
Days 1 & 2: Arrival and Travel to Isabela
Day 3, Part 1: Pesticide Shopping in San Mariano
Day 3, Part 2: Interviewing Indigenous Farmworkers

Jill Richardson :: Philippines Diaries, Day 3, Part 3 - The Bioethanol Plant
The group who went to the plant were welcomed by the resident manager. He briefed them on the bioethanol project. I was not in this group, so this diary is based on the notes and memories of Edna Maguidad and Simone Lovera, who were in the group that visited the plant.

The plant is owned and run by Green Future Investment, Inc. (GFII), which is a joint venture mostly owned by a Japanese company called ITOCHU. They have contracted with ECOFUEL Land Development, Inc. to create a sugarcane plantation. No representative from ECOFUEL was at this meeting, so there were some questions that the GFII resident manager could not answer.


Members of our group visiting the bioethanol plant.

The bioethanol plant is currently under construction, and there are three contractors building it. They are targeting March 2012 to open the plant. The plant, once open, will be able to accommodate 3000 tons of sugarcane per day. The waste material from the sugarcane (bagasse) will be used to fuel the plant and to generate electricity that will be sold to the grid. The sugarcane juice will first have its water removed, then it will be made into alcohol. It will initially be 95% alcohol, but they need it to be 99% alcohol, so they will go through another process to extract the remaining water so that it is is "fuel grade alcohol." It will be stored in a storage facility with 6 million liters of storage.

The facility will also use anaerobic digestion to produce methane biogas. The wastewater will be returned to the local environment, which they call "ferti-irrigation." The plant itself is 30 hectares, and they need 11,000 hectares for the sugarcane plantation. They will use 6000 cubic meters of water every day. They plan to source it from wells (local groundwater), and they say it won't impact local residents. They said they had an environmental impact assessment in 2010, and they will not pollute the air at all. Before releasing any air, they have an electrostatic precipitator that will capture any solid elements in the air.

When the group asked about the sugarcane plantation, the resident manager said we should direct those questions to ECOFUEL. The sugarcane plantation will first prioritize idle and abandoned lands for use, but they realize that some of the lands they are already using for sugarcane are land where food crops were previously grown. At this time, they did not say how much of their land was previously used for food crops. They also don't have a good definition for "marginal land."

Our group asked about competition between using land for sugarcane for biofuels and using it for reforestation, the manager from GFII said he did not know. He added that when there is land that is in dispute, their policy is to back out. Thus, they say, they have no impact or influence on land grabbing. He said they have a process for ensuring that the person they contract with for their land is the actual owner. At this time, the resident manager did not know the process to explain it to our group.

They said they will bring many benefits to the community.
1. Jobs. They will directly hire 260 people, and for the 11,000 hectares of the sugarcane plantation, they need many workers and most will come from the local area. They said they need one worker for every one to one and a half hectares of sugarcane. And, again, this will be contracted by ECOFUEL.
2. Jobs for Trucking. They also said they need 200 trucks per day. (This worries us, as it will do a number on local roads and traffic.)
3. Free organic fertilizer. They promised to provide ECOFUEL with organic fertilizer for free to use on the farms. ("Ferti-irrigation")
4.  Fourth, the employees will bring demand for housing.
5. Fifth, they will supply power (for a charge!) to the community.

Simone, our forests expert, asked about the viability of the project. What is their plan B? They said off-season, they will augment their ethanol plant with molasses when they can't get enough sugarcane. They need a minimum of 8000 hectares of sugarcane to keep the plant running. And that depends on the price of molasses - if it's too expensive, it won't work. Also, the viability of the project depends on getting the sugarcane from within 40 km from the plant. Beyond that distance, it will cost too much for trucking to make it viable.

Right now they have an estimated 3000 hectares planted in sugarcane and a 300 hectare sugarcane nursery. They say they will provide all of the technology and the inputs for the sugarcane. They will mostly lease land from farmers for their sugarcane plantation, but they also have an option for farmers to do contract growing.

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Our group has MANY questions still (4.00 / 2)
for these two companies. We met with them at the end of the week and it was clear then that there are many things that need to be cleared up. We agreed to follow up by sending them a list of questions. I don't know if this has been done yet.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

water use (4.00 / 2)
6,000 cubic meters might not seem like much, but that's nearly 1,600,000 (1.6 million) U.S. gallons per day.

oh no it seems like plenty (4.00 / 2)
That certainly raised our eyebrows

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
6000 cubic meters (4.00 / 2)
In graphic terms for Americans, that volume would cover a football field goal posts to goal posts and sideline to sideline to a depth of 1.2 yards!

[ Parent ]
pollution (4.00 / 2)
They promised to provide ECOFUEL with organic fertilizer for free...

Pollution by another name. Crap. Water from the sugarcane juice and the wastewater should be recovered for re-use. 1.6 million gallons of water per day, or at least a sizable fraction of that, will be wasted for profit.


[ Parent ]
Well, the upside is that it's going back (4.00 / 1)
into the water table after they take so dang much out of there. But I worry about what will be in it - i.e. nitrates, pesticides, etc.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
your good point (4.00 / 2)
We don't necessarily know that it will get back into the water table instead of going into pollution runoff, but careful management might mean that it could replace irrigation water that otherwise would come from groundwater of surface water. But, will it be carefully managed? How much irrigation is needed in Luzon? Does sugarcane require irrigation?I suppose irrigation is needed for rice paddies - could this water be used for rice paddies?

[ Parent ]
The area doesn't seem to have any shortages of (4.00 / 2)
water. But I was there during the start of monsoon season. Still, I don't think there's any shortage of water. Some of the rice uses irrigation. Most farmers don't have irrigation though. What I hear is that farmers without irrigation grow rice in the rainy season and corn in the dry season, since it can make due with less water. Farmers with irrigation can grow rice year round. Then again, perhaps they can grow upland rice without irrigation year round?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
pollution more generally (4.00 / 2)
Besides the water issue, of course there is the solid waste issue. The company (and I suppose the government) says the solid waste will be fertilizer, but I wonder. Did the environmental assessment estimate how much solid waste can be beneficially used by farmers? I foresee the possibility that the waste problem could result in more environmental/ecological degradation, the consequence of the corporation externalizing costs it rightfully should bear.

[ Parent ]
off season (4.00 / 2)
How many crops will be harvested per year? One and done?

I don't know enough about sugarcane, honestly (4.00 / 2)
but from what I have read, you get one harvest per year for six years from a sugarcane plant. Then you re-plant. I'd assume with so many hectares, they'd be continuously planting and harvesting from the entire area throughout the year. The farmworkers I spoke to say they are already employed 6 days a week, all year long, working on the sugarcane. But it certainly could have seasonal aspects based on rain and such. And of course typhoons hit this area pretty hard so I'd imagine there will be times when the crop will be damaged by a typhoon and the plant will have to think about using molasses then.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
production (4.00 / 2)
What is the estimated output (daily or some other interval) of 99% ethanol?

54 million liters/year (4.00 / 2)
More info here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/ind...

I didn't do a great job writing the article yet, but the list of links at the bottom is a good one.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


[ Parent ]
power generation (4.00 / 2)
At the Sourcewatch article, an article says the plant could produce 100,000 MW annually.

Hmm. Another article reports

Co said the facility would generate 19 megawatts of renewable energy, including 13 MW that can be offered to the Luzon grid to help ease the projected power supply problem.

The difference beyween 19 MW and 100 GW is huge. The 100 GW figure must be an error. At present, only three hydroelectric plants in the world are 10 GW or larger. The largest, Three Gorges in China, in less than 25 GW.


[ Parent ]
They told us 16 MW (4.00 / 2)
So that's the # I'd go with. Some 6 MW to run the plant, and 10 MW to the grid. But not for free - they are selling it.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
You see the problem, right? (4.00 / 2)
Whether we say 19 MW or 16 MW, the difference between that and 100,000 MW is huge, and they cannot both be correct. The two articles do not agree.

I think I know the explanation for the discrepancy. I think the articles are talking about two different things but calling them the same thing. Both articles talk about the plant supplying energy, but I think one article specifies the power rating of the electricity generating facility (19 MW), and the other article specifies how much energy that facility could generate in a year (100,000 megawatt-hours, although it mistakenly uses the term 100,000 MW instead of 100,000 MWh). The power rating for the plant cannot possibly be 100,000 MW.

Your Sourcewatch article needs correction. How you do it is up to you.

If you decide to keep the 100,000 number, just switch the unit designation to MWh instead of MW, with an asterisk or parenthetical explanation of the difference between what you write and what the cited article said.

I note that a generating station with an average power rating of 12 MW running 24 hours per day for 365 days would generate about 105,000 MWh of energy. Approx. 100,000 MWh of energy would be generated by a plant with a higher power rating running for fewer hours or days.


[ Parent ]
output (4.00 / 2)
less than 40,000 U.S. gallons per day assuming 365-day operation.

[ Parent ]
upgrade process (4.00 / 2)
95% ethanol is dehydrated (in the U.S. and I assume in Luzon) by passage through a molecular sieve material, separating alcohol and water on the basis of molecular size. Yikes.

Wow, a collander for ethanol (4.00 / 3)
or water, which ever is bigger.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

[ Parent ]
You got it. (4.00 / 2)
This application seems like it must be near the limit of the technology. I'm impressed.

[ Parent ]
carbon dioxide (4.00 / 2)
The brewers amongst us know that sugar fermentation produces a lot of carbon dioxide. How much carbon dioxide will the plant generate? What will the plant do with the carbon dioxide? Release it into the atmosphere?

I'm assuming (4.00 / 3)
that's what the air scrubbers Jill mentioned are for?

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

[ Parent ]
Sure but what would they do with the CO2? (4.00 / 2)
The only kind of air scrubber to get rid of that is called PLANTS!

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
electrostatic precipitators (4.00 / 2)
collect dust, various particulates, not gas.

[ Parent ]
Check out this article (4.00 / 2)
Federal Lab Says It Can Harvest Fuel From Air (With a Catch)

It's interesting, but doesn't have anything to do with this particular plant and any carbon dioxide it will generate.

However, there are scrubbers that remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  In the case of closed environments (scuba, the space shuttle, the space station, etc.) and also for industrial use in reducing gasseous pollutants.

Carbon Dioxide Scrubber article at Wikipedia


Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


[ Parent ]
Probably, yeah. (4.00 / 2)
Seems like it.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox