Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

The Dirt on Glyphosate

by: Jill Richardson

Mon Apr 11, 2011 at 23:53:27 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
Last week, a second letter by Don Huber warning about worrying research on Roundup (glyphosate) and GMOs was leaked. This time he included a long list of published, peer reviewed studies on glyphosate that I've spent the last week reading through. So I thought it was time to share what I've gathered from them thus far.  
Jill Richardson :: The Dirt on Glyphosate
Roundup contains both glyphosate and a surfactant. The information below focuses on glyphosate ONLY. When you spray glyphosate on a plant, it is absorbed through the foliage and transported throughout the plant, including its roots. Ultimately it is released into the soil from the roots. Once absorbed by the plant, glyphosate prevents the plant from making three amino acids it needs to survive: phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. It does this by inhibiting an enzyme needed to make chorismate, a precursor to those amino acids.

However, other research found that there was a second way glyphosate worked to kill plants. Glyphosate disrupts plants' ability to defend themselves against pathogens. Plants produce chemicals called phytoalexins to defend themselves, and glyphosate disrupts their ability to produce phytoalexins.

"Glyphosate interactions with physiology, nutrition, and diseases of plants: Threat to agricultural sustainability?" in the European Journal of Agronomy (2009) says: "These findings were significant because the release of glyphosate into the environment was found to have considerably more and far-reaching effects than the original notion that was limited to only the localized disruption of a specific metabolic pathway within a target plant."

The same publication goes on to say:

Subsequent research on glyphosate interactions with soil microorganisms demonstrated that although glyphosate was metabolized by a segment of the microbial population, it was also toxic to several bacteria and fungi; the net effect glyphosate appeared to be a disruption of soil and root microbial community composition because selected components of the microbial community were stimulated while others were suppressed.

So glyphosate impacts more than just the target plants, the weeds. It also disrupts the soil ecosystem.

As for breakdown in the soil, glyphosate mostly either binds to soil particles or it is broken down by microbes. About 1-2% of glyphosate in the soil may runoff into waterways when it rains. When glyphosate breaks down, it becomes CO2 and NH4 (ammonium). Looking at 47 studies on the half-life of glyphosate in the soil, the half-life (the amount of time it took for half the glyphosate to break down) ranged from 1.2 days to 197.3 days. The arithmetic mean amount of time was 32 days and the geometric mean was 17 days. Another study found that glyphosate was toxic (although not lethally so) to non-target plants up to 3 weeks after it was applied. Sub-lethal doses of glyphosate can also impact a plants' ability to absorb nutrients, such as iron.

That's as far as I've read through the many, many studies Huber referenced (and each study references many more studies, leaving anyone interested in glyphosate with an endless amount of reading to do). I'd be interested to hear what else others have read on this topic.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

you can find more here (4.00 / 2)
http://www.sourcewatch.org/ind...
(I've been writing that page up as my way of organizing the data I read through.)

Also, I know that this was likely discussed in depth by others on this site in the past and I really wasn't engaged in that conversation and didn't go back and consult it just now, which I probably should have. My apologies.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


non-target plants (4.00 / 2)
non-target plants = crops, right?

yep (4.00 / 2)
non-target = whatever isn't a weed that you don't want to kill.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
studies (4.00 / 2)
Would you say that industry claims that Huber's concerns are not supported by published scientific evidence are not true? Apparently USDA and FDA bureaucrats, and perhaps scientists, do not read the scientific literature.

I'm not sure (4.00 / 3)
but my hunch is that they probably believe the studies and still think that the product is relatively harmless. I mean, thus far I haven't read anything that says it makes people sick or kills animals or anything like that. And lord knows the govt allows us to use far worse products that ARE acutely toxic (or toxic over the long term) to humans, animals, etc.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
By the way (4.00 / 2)
I picked up those links from an article by Jeffrey Smith.

[ Parent ]
Also (4.00 / 2)
glyphosate's been around since the 70's and the majority of the studies Huber cited are from 2009 or later. So there's an awful lot of people out there who have been using this product for years without questioning it much already.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
complacency (0.00 / 0)
Obama prepared to expand OCS drilling before Deepwater Horizon and he supports nuclear power now because, despite warnings and events elsewhere in the world, we haven't had any really bad news in the U.S. for a long time, therefore we won't have any really bad news in the U.S. in future. I predict the same thing will happen re glyphosate. We'll forge mindlessly ahead until it's too late.

[ Parent ]
main thing about Huber (4.00 / 2)
Perhaps the most important thing to know about Huber is that one of his jobs has been to maintain and enhance the vigor of industrial agriculture. He is not anti-glyphosate or anti-GMO in any knee-jerk way, which is what makes his warnings so compelling to me.

Agreed (4.00 / 2)
Very much agreed.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Excellent article (4.00 / 2)
and work over at Source Watch. The Source Watch page is going in my favorites folder under farming resources.

It's fascinating how chemicals work. For instance I had heard some things about how glyphosate worked, but not the specifics and I'd heard nothing about issues like iron uptake.

Sorry I haven't been around in a while, but it's the crazy time of the year with planting, etc. My day off is 'only' around 6-8 hours long. The rest are 14-16. I'll be glad when the middle of July rolls around and thing slow down again....

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


Would this effect the Honey Bee population? (4.00 / 1)
Just a thought.

Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox