Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

UN Report: Eco-Farming Can Double Food Production

by: Jill Richardson

Tue Mar 08, 2011 at 05:00:00 AM PST


Bookmark and Share
Today, Olivier de Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, presented an incredible report on agroecology to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. Please read my piece about it on Alternet. And, of course, go to http://www.srfood.org and download the report if you'd like to read it yourself (it's a painless 20 pages or so).

Other news coverage: The Ecologist, The Guardian

And, because it is SO well-written, I've included the press release that went out on the report in full.

Eco-Farming Can Double Food Production in 10 Years, says New UN Report

GENEVA - Small-scale farmers can double food production within 10 years in critical regions by using ecological methods, a new UN report demonstrates. Based on an extensive review of recent scientific literature, the report calls for a fundamental shift towards agroecology as a way to end food crises and address climate- and poverty challenges.

"To feed 9 billion people in 2050, we urgently need to adopt the most efficient farming techniques available. And today's scientific evidence demonstrates that agroecological methods outperform the use of chemical fertilizers in boosting food production in regions where the hungry live", says Olivier De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food and author of the report.

Agroecology applies ecological science to the design of agricultural systems. It enhances soils productivity and protects the crops against pests by relying on natural environment such as beneficial trees, plants, animals and insects. The UN report shows that agroecology considerably reduces farmers' reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. It is now used by small-scale farmers in many developed and developing countries, with impressive results compared to conventional, chemical-based approach.

More below...

Jill Richardson :: UN Report: Eco-Farming Can Double Food Production
"To date, agroecological projects have shown an average crop yield increase of 80% in 57 developing countries, with an average increase of 116% for all African projects", explains De Schutter. "Recent projects conducted in 20 African countries demonstrated a doubling of crop yields over a period of 3-10 years."

The report notes that the positive impact of agroecology on food production and climate change mitigation is so spectacular that a growing range of experts are now supporting agroecology as the best way to feed the world in the 21st century. "Conventional farming is expensive, fuels climate change and is not resilient to climatic shocks. It simply is not the best choice anymore today", De Schutter said. "Even Malawi, a country that launched a massive chemical fertilizer subsidy program a few years ago, is now implementing agroecology. The government now subsidizes farmers to plant nitrogen-fixing trees in their fields to ensure sustained growth in maize production. This programme benefits more than 1.3 million of the poorest people, and yields already increased from 1 t/ha to 2-3 t/ha with such practices."

The report also indicates that projects in Indonesia, Vietnam and Bangladesh recorded up to 92 % reduction in insecticide use for rice, leading to important savings for poor farmers. "Knowledge came to replace pesticides and fertilizers in these projects. This was a winning bet, and comparable results abound in other African, Asian and Latin American countries", adds De Schutter. "The approach is also gaining ground in developed countries such as United States, Germany or France. However, despite its impressive potential in realizing the right to food for all, agroecology is still insufficiently backed by ambitious public policies and consequently hardly goes beyond the experimental stage."

The report identifies a dozen of measures that States should implement to scale up agro-ecological practices.

"Agroecology is a knowledge-intensive approach. It requires public policies supporting agricultural research and participative extension services", says De Schutter. "States and donors have a key role to play here. Private companies will not invest time and money in practices that cannot be rewarded by patents and which don't open markets for chemical products or improved seeds."

The Special Rapporteur on the right to food also urges States to support small-scale farmer's organizations, which demonstrated a great ability to disseminate the best agroecological practices among their members. "Strengthening social organization proves to be as impactful as distributing fertilizers. Small-scale farmers and scientists can create innovative practices when they partner", explains De Schutter. "We won't solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations. The solution lies in supporting small-scale farmers' knowledge and experimentation, and in raising incomes of smallholders so as to contribute to rural development."

"If key stakeholders support the measures identified in the report, we can see a doubling of food production within 5 to 10 years in some regions where the hungry live" affirms De Schutter. "Whether or not we will succeed this transition will depend on our ability to learn faster from recent innovations. We need to go fast if we want to avoid repeated food and climate disasters in the 21st century."

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Amen. (4.00 / 4)
"Agroecology is a knowledge-intensive approach. It requires public policies supporting agricultural research and participative extension services", says De Schutter. "States and donors have a key role to play here. Private companies will not invest time and money in practices that cannot be rewarded by patents and which don't open markets for chemical products or improved seeds."

Isn't that the ultimate summation of this discussion? Isn't that the delineation of the entire battlefield in one paragraph?


That's pretty much a no brainer (4.00 / 2)
A company's sole purpose of existence is to make money. At least it is for the for profit companies, mine included. There is no point in doing work that will not make you money. In fact if you do that long enough and are good enough you'll go bankrupt at the end of the process.

That's the real force behind the green revolutions from the company end of things.

It's also why a lot of research, especially pure research, is funded by government. Businesses don't have the resources to do that kind of work. Government doesn't need to turn a profit, hell, it doesn't even need to break even.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


[ Parent ]
recommendations (4.00 / 4)
train scientists in the design of agroecological approaches, participatory
research methods, and processes of co-inquiry with farmers, and ensure that
their organizational culture is supportive of agroecological innovations and
participatory research

That reminds me of your trip to Chiapas. Do you have any feedback on that experiment yet, or is it too early?

This seems ultra important:

assess projects on the basis of a comprehensive set of performance criteria
(impacts on incomes, resource efficiency, impacts on hunger and malnutrition,
empowerment of beneficiaries, etc.) with indicators appropriately
disaggregated by population to allow monitoring improvements in the status of
vulnerable populations, taking into account the requirements of the right to
food, in addition to classical agronomical measures.


I should check on the experiment (4.00 / 4)
but if it started in December, then it's been 3 mos. They might have some early results in the tropical areas, not in the highlands. The corn goes bad faster in the tropics but they get 2 crops a year (or 3) so this would now be the midway point of how long they store the corn. If they are taking the corn out and weighing it to get some early results, then they'll know by now. I can ask.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Jill, this is off-topic (4.00 / 4)
but I wanted to bring this to your attention so someone can work on making this a posting http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/...

Photographers - perhaps including some ghosts from Farm Security Administration days - are astir at news of a bill introduced by State Senator Jim Norman of Florida that would make it a felony to take a picture of a farm without the owner's permission: A person who photographs, video records or otherwise produces images or pictorial records, digital or otherwise, at or of a farm or other property where legitimate agriculture operations are being conducted without the written consent of the owner, or an authorized representative of the owner, commits a felony of the first degree.

The bill, S.B. 1246, was introduced on Tuesday. Matthew Yglesias, whose blog brought the matter to our attention, wrote, "The specific freedom-enhancing element of this particular initiative is that apparently freedom-hating animal rights activists have been known to secretly document farm activities in order to advance socialism."
An e-mail sent to Senator Norman's office requesting an explanation of the legislation had not been answered by late Tuesday afternoon.


Protecting intellectual property... (4.00 / 2)
That claim is particularly cute.  Maybe they can even make it retroactive, so that Monsanto can send its goon squads to round up (heh) everybody who's ever taken or posted pictures of a field anywhere in America...

What surprises me most is that they haven't tried something like this up until now.  Or have they?


[ Parent ]
Jim Norman... (4.00 / 2)
Ha!

Looks like this guy is no stranger in the area of secrets and property.


[ Parent ]
he appealed (4.00 / 2)
An appeals court judge overturned the lower court ruling and put Norman back on the ballot. He had no Democratic opposition in the general election.

[ Parent ]
Financial disclosure laws are made to be broken... (4.00 / 3)
At least in Florida, apparently.  Oh, and on the Supreme Court.  Hi, Clarence!

[ Parent ]
thanks (4.00 / 3)
I'll post about it.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
I have no problem with restrictions (4.00 / 2)
being placed on people working in facilities. Especially since those facilities are closed to the public (I'm talking about livestock facilities). That'd be like someone coming into your home, secretly video capturing or taking photos and then plastering them all over the internet. Which in Oregon is actually legal (Oregon only requires that one party agree to or be aware of the recording of video or audio).

However, from the bolded text it looks like this activity would be covered too, and that would be photographing a farm or ag operation from a public road? How about all the satelite images out there from Google Earth, Map Quest, etc. I can go on any of those and look right into your back yard. Hell, I have a freind in upstate New York who found a grow operation on her farm. She called the cops who removed and destroyed the grow, but she couldn't figure out how the people figured out just where to plant the pot. Cop said they probably used the satelite imagery from Google Earth to figure out the route into the property (that went from the road and across adjacent property to get to the grow location) and where to locate the grow. A part of the property that wasn't being used, was as far as possible from the actively used areas, and that was fairly well shielded from those active areas.

I've always been inclined to ask permission before shooting across someone else's property if at all possible, if their property would be a part of the shot, but I don't thing that there is any kind of law mandating you get someone's permission if you're shooting areas that are visible from say a public road, or even a neighbor's property as long as the shooter was on the neighbor's property with permission.

Hell, I could go up to your house, photograph it, take the owner info that is public record, and plaster that all  over the internet. All completely legal. That's all public info.

But the only way you can get inside someone's business or home (remember, a lot of these animal facilities are located on the same property that the farmer is living on) is with permission.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


[ Parent ]
did you see the bill (4.00 / 1)
would make this a felony though? That's very extreme!

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
felony "in the first degree." nt (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
I don't think that going into a private business (4.00 / 1)
in that part not open to the public, and doing that type of covert surveillance being made a felony as being extreme.  

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox