Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

The Truth About "Whole Grains" in School Meals

by: euclidarms

Fri Jan 28, 2011 at 03:39:41 AM PST


Bookmark and Share
( - promoted by Jill Richardson)

By Ed Bruske
aka The Slow Cook

If the U.S. Department of Agriculture has its way, kids will soon be seeing lots more whole grain food on their cafeteria trays--up to 80 percent more at breakfast under the agency's proposed new meal guidelines [PDF].

But as my colleague Lisa Suriano pointed out in this space recently, if you thought that meant spelt and quinoa suddenly making an appearance in the nation's lunch rooms, you might want to re-assess. In fact, federal rules permit products containing just 51 percent "whole grain" flour to be classified as "whole grain."

euclidarms :: The Truth About "Whole Grains" in School Meals
Forget the Middle Easter tabouleh. More likely, what kids will be served is lots more dinner rolls, hamburger buns, muffins and pizza crusts with added fiber. That would be the new definition of "healthy."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the 51 percent rule after the food industry petitioned the government in 1999. The USDA has its own euphamistic turn of phrase for these fiber-boosted buns and crusts. It calls them "whole grain-rich."

Ironically, the feds want schools to substantially boost "whole grain-rich" foods that contain 49 percent starchy white flour at the same time they propose cutting way back on "starchy vegetables" such as potatoes. Schools would be limited to only two weekly servings of things like french fries and potato wedges.

Not surprisingly, wheat is one of the most heavily subsidized crops in the U.S.--wheat farmers received more than $2.2 billion in taxpayer funds in 2009--while potatoes aren't. You can also add to the list of un-subsidized crops most other healthful whole grains--quinoa, barley, amaranth, to name a few--which makes them much more expensive than "whole grain-rich" products.

The only actual whole grain the USDA makes available to schools through its commodities program is brown rice, and you don't see that on school menus very often. Of the 48 grain products on the USDA's list of commodity school foods [PDF], 17 fall under the "white flour" category and 12 under white rice. The USDA only lists three brown rice products.

The proposed meal guidelines even make a special allowance for grain-based desserts, although elsewhere the USDA says it wants to limit sugar on school menus.

According to Lisa Suriano, a nutritionist and school food educator, schools could prepare a half-cup dish of bulgur wheat for 24 cents per serving. But most schools have only $1 or less to spend on ingredients for each lunch meal. Congress, while calling for new meal standards that are bound to jack up the price of meals, only provided 6 cents in its most recent re-authorization of the federally-subsidized meals program.

Working extra fiber into school menus is only the first hurdle. The real trick is getting kids to eat it. They happen to love potatoes and rather dislike whole grains, although these do go down easier when smothered in cheese, pizza sauce and slices of pepperoni.

In Boulder, Col., schools, cooks put tabouleh--made of bulgur wheat, parsley and tomatoes--on the salad bar on pizza days because the preferred pizza crust does not contain whole grain flour. When tomatoes and cucumbers fell out of season in the fall, they switched to an Asian bulgur salad with carrots, peas and a soy-based sauce.

"I can't say either one has been super popular, but at least we've been able to introduce these items to our students," said chef Brandy Dreibelbis, who develops recipes for Boulders chools. "We stuck with the bulgur wheat, because of the low cost.'

"My hope is that someday we will be able to introduce a quinoa dish to the kids," Dreibelbis added. "I think we could be a little more creative with this ingredient, plus the healthy benefits are amazing. But unfortunately it comes down to the cost and quinoa is still slightly more expensive than bulgur."

Dreibelbis said she recently tested several commercial brands of whole grain bread sticks, but even they come with sticker shock.

"I'm sure that the students would love these with their pasta, but once again it comes down to cost," she said. "These breadsticks would add an additional eight to 12 cents per meal.  When you have such a limited amount to spend, even eight cents adds up quickly."

Ann Cooper, who runs food services for Boulder schools, said they stopped serving whole wheat pasta because the kids didn't like it. But if the USDA rules go into effect as written, the regular pasta will no longer be permitted.

"I'm trying to figure out the pasta piece," Cooper said.

Here in D.C., I recently noticed a "whole grain-rich" biscuit being served for breakfast at my daughter's elementary school alongside something called "turkey cheese melt."

The processed turkey slices speckled with melted cheddar were merely unappetizing. The kids picked off the cheese with their fingers to get at the meat. The biscuit...Well, it was hardly recognizable. I happen to love a fluffy white biscuit. What would a traditional southern breakfast be without one? This thing was simply inedible. It looked like an old horse turd.

Some food traditions are better left unchanged--even at school.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

costlier meals (4.00 / 1)
Congress, while calling for new meal standards that are bound to jack up the price of meals, only provided 6 cents in its most recent re-authorization of the federally-subsidized meals program.

How much would costs increase? I haven't seen that number before, but one number is in an article published yesterday.

Inland school lunches are about to get healthier, more costly

January 30, 2011
By BEN GOAD
Washington Bureau

Schools meeting minimum requirements of the Healthy Kids bill are eligible for an additional 6 cents per student per day in federal funding. But federal estimates show that the new standards will cost an additional 64 cents for each student daily, leaving schools with a 58-cent gap to fill.

"Six cents is not going to pay for even a slice of whole wheat bread," Adams said.

Is 64 cents a good number? If so, who's kidding whom? How many state education departments or school districts will see their way to funding another 58 cents? I bet school nutritions are being looked at for funding decreases all across the country.


64 cents (4.00 / 1)
I don't think the estimated cost of improving school meals has been previously cited at LVL, although I could be wrong. Ed addressed the general topic in a previous diary, however.

Obama's New Normal: Tax Breaks for Billionaires, Higher Lunch Prices for School Kids

Dec 14, 2010

...lawmakers have told schools to raise lunch prices to at least cover what it views as the full cost of making a meal. Entitled "equity in school lunch pricing," the new mandate could, by increasing prices gradually for students whose families aren't low income, pump an additional $2.6 billion into the school meal program over the next 10 years, according to one estimate.

Matching costs would generate a heck of a lot more than $2.6 billion, I think, but the number doesn't come from analyzing what would happen if costs were matched. Instead, it comes from extrapolating a formula in the legislation, which is related to cost only in a very tangential way (or not at all). According to Ed,

Under the formula approved by Congress, schools that are not charging the full cost for lunch would have to start raising their prices annually by an amount equal to the rate of inflation plus 2 percent. For some schools, getting their prices fully caught up could take 20 years.

A study released in January 2010 by the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonprofit research organization focused on low-income Americans, noted that student payments for federally reimbursable meals account for only about one-quarter of school food-service revenues. The greatest share of income comes in the form of federal subsidies, with sales of competitive foods in รก la carte lines (often unhealthy snacks like cookies and chips) and vending machines contributing about 16 percent, and state and local governments chipping in another 9 percent on average.
...

A study conducted during the 2005-2006 school year by the USDA, which oversees the school meals program, found that the prices schools charged for paid lunches varied widely, from 65 cents to $3, with the most common price being $1.50 -- well below cost. A more recent analysis by the CBPP of the nation's 20 largest school...districts found that the average charge for lunch was $1.80 in elementary schools and $2.14 in high schools, still far less than the federal reimbursement rate.

I'm having difficulty sorting out all the things I feel about this. Certainly I think setting a low-ball price and sticking with it for years doesn't seem reasonable. The argument to the contrary is that raising prices decreases participation. Ed writes about that, and the participation rate is an important factor to be considered, if not the determining factor. Still, I think Americans need to think hard about what "affordability" means in the context of this discussion.

I don't know if I live in one of our 20 largest school districts, but I live in a city. Let's say I am a parent whose children don't qualify for free or reduced priced school meals, and say I can "afford" $2.14 for a high-schooler's lunch. What can I do with that money?

My child could brown-bag lunch. I don't know what the peer groups say about that, maybe brown-bagging is socially unacceptable these days, but pretend it's a viable alternative. Maybe I could provide reasonable nutrition for $2.14 per lunch, 5 days a week, if I made everything from scratch. I'm not sure, I'm guessing. One orange costs one dollar, one apple costs one dollar. Fruit costs less by the bag, but if I'm in the economic margins maybe I can't "afford" to buy by the bag. I think I probably could provide two tuna sandwiches for $1.07, I might even be able to include a tomato slice or pickles, but if I add a package of chips there goes my budget and I haven't provided a beverage. Will water do? I veer toward "unaffordability" as soon as I depart from "from scratch." The most expensive ways to buy wheat, corn, and potatoes are to buy cold cereal and chips. Buying pre-sliced cheese or cheese-type "food" instead of slicing cheese myself? Expensive. The cheapest deli "meat" I know of in Baltimore is Esskay braunschweiger at about $4/lb. For $2.14 I couldn't even make two braunschweiger sandwiches including bread and mayo, because sales tax increases the cost. Again, no fruit, vegetable, or drink (and Esskay is a subsidiary of Smithfield Foods).

Compared to brown bagging, school lunch looks like an awfully good deal at $2.14. (Do students pay sales tax on school meals? Ed, do you know for D.C.?)

I could give my child the $2.14 to use for forage in the wilds of the urban landscape. I don't have any idea what that would buy from the vending machines or the a la carte lines. I know that a supermarket in my neighborhood (generic, not Whole Foods) has a salad bar and a hot food bar. The hot food bar is $5.99/lb. $2.14 minus 6% sales tax leaves $2.01, so she could get 1/3 pound of hot food, no drink. The salad bar is $4.99/lb. She could get 0.4 lb. from the salad bar, no drink. One pint of the notorious flavored sugar milk is about $1.79 (perhaps $1.89?) at the convenience store. $2.14 might buy one hot dog and one Big Gulp from the 7-11 across the street, but I doubt it.

Compared to a la carte, school lunch looks like an awfully good deal at $2.14.

For all I know, $2.14 actually is a major burden for many families who don't qualify for free or reduced price school meals, but I have to wonder. How "unaffordable" is a $3.00 meal in a society that sees nothing remarkable about spending hard-earned money for bottled water and Diet Pepsi? We say we can't "afford" to feed our children, but we spend nearly $50 billion dollars per year to feed and take care of our cats, dogs, and parakeets.

I wandered far from my original point, which was the mismatch in legislation that provides an additional $0.06 per meal while one report says the same legislation will increase the cost of the meal by $0.64. A quote from Ed's previous diary lists three ways to close the gap, but I view this situation with some trepidation. Is a train wreck in our future?


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox