Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Outgoing Iowa governor proposes new egg safety rules

by: desmoinesdem

Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 15:20:43 PM PST


Bookmark and Share
Although last year's massive egg recall was linked to a Salmonella enteriditis outbreak at two facilities in Iowa, few politicians in this state have advocated new food safety rules or procedures. During his final address to the Iowa legislature yesterday, Governor Chet Culver (D) said his administration "provided the legislature and the new administration with a detailed summary addressing the historic egg recall last summer. This includes five proposed changes in Iowa law that will help improve food safety and employee training standards in the wake of the salmonella outbreak last summer." Excerpt from the Culver administration memo:

Although the new federal egg regulatory regime is aimed at the state's largest producers, a new, mandatory Iowa [Salmonella enteriditis] detection and prevention program should be enacted under amendments to existing law and the creation of a new Iowa Code Section 196.15 to complement the federal government's efforts to prevent SE contaminated shell eggs from entering into the nation's food chain from all of Iowa's egg producers.

There are at least five issues that are not covered by the recent federal egg regulatory reforms, that Iowa law does not currently address and that, therefore, unless corrected legislatively, may leave consumers of Iowa-produced eggs vulnerable to future SE poisoning.  First, federal egg safety laws pertain only to egg farms that host at least 3,000 hens and do not cover smaller operations.  Second, under federal law, producers have no legal obligation to report positive SE testing results to any federal or state agency.   Third, there are no accreditation or certification standards for laboratories that conduct SE testing.  Fourth, there are no legal criteria that establish the minimal level of training and competency for persons who are charged with the responsibility for implementing a new mandatory SE detection and prevention program.  And, fifth, there is no clearly-identified funding stream to support an effective expansion of state egg programs.

I posted the complete Culver administration memo on egg safety proposals at the Iowa community blog Bleeding Heartland. I'm not optimistic that incoming Governor Terry Branstad or the Iowa legislature will support these ideas, but they merit serious consideration. I would be interested in feedback from the La Vida Locavore community.

desmoinesdem :: Outgoing Iowa governor proposes new egg safety rules
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Recommendations (4.00 / 2)
I knew about problems one and five, not the others. Problem 2 seems like a glaring error and should be corrected - any chance Congress might do that? Probably not.

Problems 3 and 4 are important also. In the 2007 Peter Pan (Conagra) peanut butter recall, a quality control officer testified to a Congress committee that the PB actually was tested before release into commerce, but the test was not designed to detect SE contamination at levels harmful to humans. That testing might not have been done by an outside lab, but that isn't my point. The system needs assurance that whoever does the test knows what they're doing.


support (4.00 / 1)
I see Larew is not in the Iowa Dept. of Ag. Do you have any information about the stance of Iowa's Secretary of Agriculture on the recommendations?

I don't know for sure (4.00 / 2)
but our Sec of Ag Bill Northey is a Republican whose stance last summer was basically, "there was nothing I could do." He certainly wasn't on the case saying, "How do we make sure this never happens again?"

[ Parent ]
Out of curiosity (4.00 / 2)
regarding the threshold on farm size (number of layers) required to test, and the (apparent) position in the memo that farms with less than 3,000 hens are not currently required to test under federal laws, has anyone floated a threshold for mandatory testing on farms having fewer than 3,000 hens?

I mean how many hens do they think a farm should have before testing is required? 50, 100, 500, 1,000?

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


250 (4.00 / 2)
"more than 250 hens, but fewer than 3,000 hens"

full text here


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the clarification. nt (0.00 / 0)


Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

[ Parent ]
more confusion (4.00 / 1)
There is indeed mention of 3,000, but further down we see this:

Requiring the Notification of State Agencies of Detected SE Infections. Under the new federal regulations, which is mandated for producers who have 50,000 or more layers, those operators who receive positive SE results from environmental or egg tests are not required to notify any federal or State of Iowa agency of those findings.

What the heck is the 50,000 about?


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox