Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Mexico Diaries: Day 8, Part 1 - If I Were a Rich Man

by: Jill Richardson

Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 21:25:57 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
This diary series covers my trip to the Mexican state of Jalisco to study the effects of NAFTA and the Green Revolution on subsistence farmers in rural areas. The trip began with a few days in Guadalajara, the largest city in the state. Then we headed to the rural town of Cuquio, about an hour and a half away, for the remainder of the trip. On the eighth day, we did three very noteworthy activities. The first was a visit to see how the other half lives, to the property of a very wealthy man. If nothing else, I recommend reading the bottom section of this post about ejidos.

If reading about the people I've visited inspires you to help, you can donate to the Center for Farmworker Families. Every penny given goes directly to these families for clothes, shoes, food, school supplies, and more.

Day 1: Guadalajara
Day 2 Part 1: Breakfast and the EcoStore
Day 2 Part 2: Jalisco Ecological Collective
Day 3: The Flea Market
Day 4: The Drive to Cuquio
Day 5: Delivering Aid to a Village
Day 6: The Second Aid Trip to a Village
Day 7: Visit with a Corn Expert

Jill Richardson :: Mexico Diaries: Day 8, Part 1 - If I Were a Rich Man
Our day began with a visit to the property of a man I'll call Miguel. He inherited quite a bit of property and also succeeded in gaining money and power in his own right as an influential man in the community and as the owner of one of Cuquio's several agrochemical stores. I heard that he owns three properties and the one we visited, which was 150 hectares (370 acres), was actually the smallest.

When we arrived, we were greeted by several of his five employees. They began by showing us the tilapia farm, located inside a large and very steamy greenhouse. They are able to raise and harvest three groups of tilapia per year, and right now the tilapia tanks are empty. Unlike aquaponic operations I've seen in the U.S. that cycle water through tilapia tanks to grow leafy greens like watercress, here they only produce tilapia. The nutrient-rich (a.k.a. dirty) water is not wasted though: it is used to irrigate the fields.

Next, the workers told us they would show us the cattle, and led us to a muddy, fenced-in yard that was entirely empty. One of the men began hollering, and up in the hills in the distance, I could see little white spots suddenly begin moving down the hill and then disappear. Soon, the cattle began to show up, first the females with their young, and then the males. The workers laughed, saying that the cows come when called because they receive salt each day, but they should know that this was the wrong time of day for them to get their salt. The cattle were Brahman, a breed used for meat and known for their ability to tolerate hot weather. As soon as the cows figured out they weren't getting any salt, they turned around, one by one, and left.

At this point, one of the workers offered to show us the orchard of lemon trees. My fellow traveler, Gus, jokingly asked if the trees were organic. The worker shot him a dirty look and didn't answer. Of course the lemon trees weren't organic. Nothing here was. I decided that I knew what lemon trees looked like and didn't need to expose myself to god knows what pesticides just to see a few more of them, but a few of my friends took off, and ultimately ended up picking and eating some of the chilis also grown on the property.

I went off to see the house. Miguel, the owner of the property, does not live here. He has a house in town. This is just a little cabin, the workers told us, and the man used it only for parties. We walked around the gorgeous, rustic "cabin," noticing both the lovely enormous jacuzzi-style bathtub and the many bottles of pesticides lying around. Outside, there was a covered area with seating, as well as a large unfilled swimming pool. The property extended to include a large area planted in corn as well as an uncultivated area that made the birders in our group go wild, particularly when they saw a bright red vermilion flycatcher flitting about.


Inside the "cabin"


Another view of the "cabin" - the table is incredible and this picture doesn't do it justice


Ridomil Gold, a fungicide made by Syngenta


Fertilizer (the middle bottle)


Fusilade Biw, an herbicide made by Syngenta


Some cattle drug

For all of the hungry people living in homes with dirt floors, no bathrooms or running water, and insufficient land to produce enough food for the year, there's clearly no lack of food in this region of Mexico. There are rich people around, and everywhere we went, we saw herds of cattle and enormous fields of corn that would make you think you were in Iowa. For all of the people who weed by hand and till the soil with a horse and a plow, there are others who can easily afford the latest in John Deere tractors. (We were told that brand loyalty for farm equipment differs regionally in Mexico, and we were in John Deere territory.) The problem in Jalisco isn't a sheer lack of food.

Ejidos
One interesting point to note is that in the early 20th century, unrest among Mexican peasants forced land reform, resulting in the ejido system. Before that, wealthy hacienda owners owned large swaths of land, and rural peasants owned little or none. Ejidos broke up the enormous haciendas, creating someone communal farms in which landless families were each given a parcel of land based on a lottery system. The ejidos seemed to be a system of usufruct, in which the government allowed the ejidatarios (peasants occupying and farming the ejido land) to live on and cultivate their parcels of land indefinitely, rent-free, and could pass the land on to their children. However, these parcels could not be sold, and the ejidatarios would lose their rights to the land if they failed to cultivate it for more than two years.

However, to make way for NAFTA, in the early 1990's, Mexico undid Article 27 of its constitution, which dealt with ejidos. Ejido parcels were now the property of the ejidatarios, and they were allowed to sell the land if they wished. Many have sold their land, resulting in fewer landholders and more consolidation of land in the hands of wealthy landowners like Miguel. Since there's precious little work to be had in the countryside and many children aren't educated beyond 6th grade, a child can be quite screwed if his or her parent sells their ejido land, leaving the child with no land to use for food production, no education, and no job.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Jay's gonna speak out of his ass again... :) (4.00 / 1)
Just an impression - so it seems to me that Mexico basically has way more internet access and more interaction to / with America / Americans than Cuba, more trinkets and more consumerism (at least in their cities); yet less good food / access to same, and less health care / access to same?

How does Mexico compare in terms of political freedom / free speech / access to and ability to practice dissidence (if there is any?), etc?

The ejidos seemed to be a system of usufruct, in which the government allowed the ejidatarios (peasants occupying and farming the ejido land) to live on and cultivate their parcels of land indefinitely, rent-free, and could pass the land on to their children. However, these parcels could not be sold, and the ejidatarios would lose their rights to the land if they failed to cultivate it for more than two years.

However, to make way for NAFTA, in the early 1990's, Mexico undid Article 27 of its constitution, which dealt with ejidos. Ejido parcels were now the property of the ejidatarios, and they were allowed to sell the land if they wished. Many have sold their land, resulting in fewer landholders and more consolidation of land in the hands of wealthy landowners like Miguel.

Now, what does that sound like?  Ah yes, that weird and destructive uniquely American "idea" of 'thisismylandandillldowhateverthehelliwantwithit!!!!'.  If they were in the US, they'd sell to K. Hovnanian or Toll Bros. to build a subdivision.  In Mexico, they sell to wealthy corn farmers who wish to expand their empire?

Coming soon to a Philadelphia near you!


great assessment (4.00 / 2)
I agree with most of it. As for political freedom, Mexicans are VERY into their politics, and we saw signs ALL OF THE PLACE painted on brick walls of many people's homes and businesses supporting the 3 various national parties, PRI, PRD, and PAN. I saw more signs for PRI (the party that was in power for decades until 2000) than I saw for PRD (the lefty party) or PAN (the pro-business party in power between 2000-now). Of course, it might not be Mexicans' own political sentiments and instead just armtwisting of local powerful political interests that made them paint the big political signs on their homes. Some of that certainly DOES go on. It's not unheard of for one party or another to march into town and inform the local people that they better for for them - OR ELSE. And then you've got the drug cartels, which I haven't even addressed yet but will soon.

Aside from that though, I did definitely hear quite a bit about radical political speech and demonstrations over the past several decades in Mexico, so there is certainly some ability to speak one's mind, although I don't know how much, nor do I know how much some of the stories I hear reflect an earlier time in Mexico that has now changed.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


[ Parent ]
Drug cartels... (4.00 / 2)
Just like as in Cuba, I haven't said anything about them yet myself  because I want to make sure you're safe back home before I open my big fucking mouth and say anything that could even remotely possibly be linked back to you...

;)

Three parties, imagine that!  Would that we had a viable third party to take on Barack W. Bush and the Republocrats, eh?

Obrador losing to Calderon in 2006 was sort of like our version of Gore blowing a sure thing to Dubya, eh?

Coming soon to a Philadelphia near you!


[ Parent ]
yes about Obrador (4.00 / 2)
and we can talk about the drugs when I'm home but the short version is: there weren't any drugs in the municipality where I was at. I'll explain this in a blog post but basically Mexico is divided into municipalities which are cities and their surrounding rural areas, and the government is for the entire municipality. So Cuquio was the city and the municipality and all the ranchos were within the municipality. And that particular municipality was more or less untouched by drug cartels.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
ejidos and NAFTA (4.00 / 2)
Inquiring minds might want to know, what the heck did NAFTA have to do with the ejido system?

Thank you for asking!

This story is a real punch in the gut. I don't know anything about it except what I just found by searching, but here goes.

The land reform "in the early 20th century" was a consequence of the Mexican Revolution of 1917-1920. Before the revolution, tens of millions of hectares were owned by U.S. interests. A lot of those "wealthy hacienda owners" weren't people like Miguel, they were U.S. corporations and wealthy U.S. businesspeople. The rural peasants, not having land of their own, worked the plantations as economic slaves. The land reform that came with the 1917 Constitution included a prohibition on foreign land ownership. I don't know whether that was part of Article 27, or a separate law, or an amendment to Article 27 - I'm sure the article was amended several times over the decades. Anyway, U.S. interests saw NAFTA as an opportunity to restore the situation to the status quo ante - before the revolution - and part of what Salinas did was end the prohibition of foreign land ownership. Now U.S. agribusiness gets to pay Mexican farmers as little as they can get away with, which is even less in Mexico than in the U.S.

None of this is simple. We (the gringos) also objected to being frozen out of the Mexican oil and gas business, so that also was jettisoned for NAFTA. This thread twined with the agricultural thread in Chiapas state, for example, where most of the population lived on the land and the land occupied by indigenous people - whatever land hadn't already been stolen from them by large ranchers - sat on a wealth of oil and gas resources. Goodbye land, hello Zapatistas.

Another reason to unravel Article 27 was the ejido system itself. We (USDA? Farm Bureau?) objected to a farmer being able to inherit use rights without incurring the punishing burden of a mortgage. Goodbye ejido.

The ejido system wasn't the only "advantage" enjoyed by rural Mexicans. With corn, for example, the government not only bought corn at subsidized prices, but also tortillas were sold at low prices in government stores.

NAFTA ended all these protections for rural Mexicans, along with the precipitous tariff phase-outs that Jill wrote about previously, although somehow U.S. farmers kept their subsidies. (And apparently Vicente Fox instituted a corn subsidy program, which supported corn production.)

I somewhat wish I knew more, but I'm not sure I could stand it. For right now, anyway, what I know is pretty sickening. Maybe I'll feel better in a day or so. Probably will.

About the illegal immigration thing? About the absence of men in the ranchos? Before I started this search, I thought maybe all that might have been unintended consequences of failing to understand basic economics. Now I think maybe we knew exactly what we were doing. As for Salinas, he cloaked his actions in Chicago School rhetoric, but maybe he didn't have much choice. The country was deeply in hock via IMF, World Bank, the U.S. peso bailout - we softened him up good.


I apologize for errors (4.00 / 2)
in the above comment. I'm sure there are some - I don't know much about the subject - but corrections are welcome, as always.

[ Parent ]
I'm not quite sure why the ejidos had to go (4.00 / 2)
in order to pass NAFTA but I think they were seen as somehow trade-distorting or whatever. A barrier to the true free market. And the govt subsidy you describe is CONASUPO, a program in which the govt bought corn for fair prices from the campesinos. Losing that was a big blow to the campesinos that I visited.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
just re-read your comment (4.00 / 2)
OK maybe the "trade distortion" thing was just an excuse to get rid of the ejidos.

Also, it was the Cardenas administration in Mexico in the 1930's that really got the ejidos going, even though they were technically begun before that as you mentioned.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


[ Parent ]
The ejidos system (4.00 / 2)
sounds somewhat similar to the Homestead Act we had in the US until relatively recently (it was discontinued in 1976 in the lower 48 and in 1986 in Alaska. Land aquired through the homestead act had to be 'proved' and if you didn't prove in 3 years the land went back to the government and someone else could get it. If you proved the land and aquired title you were then allowed to sell it, transfer it to heirs, etc.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

[ Parent ]
Homestead Act (4.00 / 1)
The Homestead Act is how my grandmother got her land in Flathead County, Montana, in 1933. Two of my aunts found the location in 1932, I think, but the family stayed in Minnestota until my dad finished high school. I have a picture of the tents she and her kids lived in the first winter. (The "kids" were pretty much adults. My youngest uncle was the only one still in school.)

[ Parent ]
trade distortion (4.00 / 1)
Trade distortion was the slogan we used to object to all the things in my comment, including the ban on foreign land ownership and exclusion from the oil and gas industry.

I was interested in our public discussion of NAFTA at the time. It was woefully bereft of facts. I remember Ross Perot arguing against NAFTA by making sucking sounds on TV. I remember a long dissertation against NAFTA by Lane Kirkland, full of slogans and ideology, but fact-free. I don't remember any of the things in my comment being discussed. I don't even know if they're actually in the NAFTA legislation that was ratified. I did discover in the search that the Zapatista rebellion was purposefully timed to begin the day after NAFTA became effective.

The search also reminded me that NAFTA itself was concluded in the George H. W. Bush administration and initialed by him in December 1992. He tried to fast-track ratification so he could be the President that signed it, but NAFTA couldn't have been ratified without the two side agreements on labor and the environment that came out of the House of Representatives.


[ Parent ]
corn subsidies did not hurt Mexico (4.00 / 1)
US farmers lost their corn & other price floors. They were reduced from 1953-1995 then ended in 1996.  Corn became a pauper, instead of a respected citizen (never a King), locked into the dungeons of Cargill, ADM & Monstanto. That's what hurt Mexico.  Subsidies are hugely unfair, but they didn't cause cheap corn prices for Mexico (as I prove 4 ways in my YouTube videos, "Michael Pollan Rebuttal," 1 & 2). Subsidy reform alone does nothing for Mexican corn farmers. Anyone advocating that, without the Food from Family Farms act of the National Family Farm Coalition, is against Mexican corn farmers, and for Cargill & ADM.

Mexican corn farmers were destroyed by US farm policy, with NAFTA opening the doors. As price leader on corn, we set the world price, and we've chosen to set it where we lose money most of the time.  That choice is what hurt Mexico. Without price floors and supply managment, our our prices have usually been below cost (ie. since the 1970s price spike).

Jill's point about the CONASUPO and ejidos is interesting.

"We're trying to warn this nation of a tidal wave ..., and it's coming your way, whether you want to know it or not...!"  female family farm activist in Iowa warning against agribusiness, Donahue Show, 1985


[ Parent ]
price fixing (0.00 / 0)
Exactly how does the U.S. grain market work now? Who determines the price a farmer receives? To whom does a farmer sell corn? Does he sell the corn to a grain elevator company? To an end user that uses the corn for feed or food or chemicals such as HFCS and ethanol? To an aggregator that exports it?

Who is the "we" that sets the world price, and how do "we" set the price below cost?


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox