Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Would You Like Cancer With That?

by: Jill Richardson

Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 13:30:09 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
Mmm, fresh, red, plump, juicy strawberries. You know what tastes really great with them? It's a secret I learned as a kid. Dip them in sour cream and then dip them in brown sugar. Delish. Or dip them in homemade whipped cream, or chocolate, or both. Or, if they are fresh picked, just eat them plain. But you know what doesn't taste good with strawberries? Cancer.

Today, the scientists at Pesticide Action Network released a document called Poison Gases in the Field: Pesticides put California families in danger. It's about tests done with a device called a Drift Catcher that monitors the air for fumigant pesticides. They gave it a try in the California town of Sisquoc to see how well local residents were protected from airborne, carcinogenic pesticides. The answer? Not well.

Jill Richardson :: Would You Like Cancer With That?
You see, nature doesn't think much of commercially grown strawberries. That's because nature doesn't like monoculture - vast fields of a single species, year after year. So if you want to overcome nature by growing strawberries as a monoculture, you need some potent toxins to do so. And that begins with soil fumigation, a process that uses a deadly chemical to kill everything in the soil before you plant your strawberries.

The test in this case was with a soil fumigant called chloropicrin. After a soil fumigation in which all of the application rules were followed and no equipment failure occurred, scientists measured levels of chloropicrin in the air. they found that "Average levels over the 19-day period were 23 to 151 times higher than acceptable cancer risks."

"What's striking about these results is what they imply about fumigation in general," says PANNA Staff Scientist Karl Tupper. "Sisquoc is not unique in terms of how close fumigated fields are to people's homes. The application we monitored was typical as well-there were no blunders and the amount of chloropicrin used was not abnormally high."

"So if this is happening in Sisquoc, it's surely happening in other California communities, and it will certainly happen with methyl iodide if it's registered," concludes Tupper.

Methyl iodide is another soil fumigant - and a potent carcinogen - that the state of California is currently considering allowing. Aside from cancer, soil fumigants are linked to headaches, vomiting, severe lung irritation, neurological effects, reduced fertility, birth defects and higher rates of miscarriage.

So, if we do away with soil fumigants and we don't allow the use of methyl iodide, does that mean we can't grow any strawberries? Hardly. Sustainable farmers work WITH nature instead of trying to overcome it, nurturing soil life instead of killing it. And it's very possible to grow strawberries sustainably:

"Sustainable farming is all about building healthy soil," says organic farmer Jim Cochran of Swanton Berry Farm. "I've been growing strawberries for 25 years, and fumigant pesticides are the last thing I'd put in my soil."
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So eating organic doesn't just benefit you... (4.00 / 4)
It benefits everyone. Just like being vegan, or significantly reducing consumption of dead animals.



isn't it sickening (4.00 / 5)
that an entire community can be exposed to cancer so that one farmer can get rich and a consumer on the other side of the country can have cheap strawberries year round?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
sweet experiment (4.00 / 3)
Now that you point this out, the use of air quality monitors does not seem like something that should be limited to a special research study. Don't the implications of this extend way beyond strawberry fumigants? Shouldn't such monitors be much more widely used? It's an old truism that we won't see problems unless we look for them. Another old truism is, ignorance is bliss.

good point (4.00 / 3)
they probably should be using them. But then - if they did, they'd probably have to discontinue use of an awful lot of chemicals.  

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
I wrote a diary a few days back (4.00 / 3)
An Expendable American Worker Video We Should All See is a good diary about what we are facing but in the Tip Jar I had this;

But as depressing as this nation's regard for nature sounds watching that video about a disregard for people's lives, when will it stop?

On NPR this weekend there was a story about disregard for California strawberry workers called Controversial Pesticide Worries Scientists

In April, the state issued a notice to approve methyl iodide with an exposure limit of 96 parts per billion for workers.

"I was shocked," says Ed Loechler, a biology professor at Boston University.

Loechler served on the independent review panel that was brought in by state regulators to help staff scientists evaluate methyl iodide.

"The number in the notice is 120 times higher than the level that both the independent scientific review panel thought was safe, as well as their own internal experts thought would be safe, in terms of worker exposure," Loechler says.

According to an assessment produced by the panel and staff scientists, the safe exposure level for workers is 0.8 parts per billion. Anything over that, they said, would be unsafe.

"I honestly think that this chemical will cause disease and illness," says Froines, who chaired the panel. "And so does everyone else on the committee."

And what did the California bureaucrats that wouldn't want thyroid cancer and miscarriages to get in the way of strawberry production have to say?

Managers at the agency say it's not up to scientists to decide whether methyl iodide is approved and at what levels.

How can we even keep track anymore?

There was a chart in that NPR story that shows the difference between science and politics.

And the hits just keep on coming.


wow (4.00 / 3)
any chance you could post this as a diary?

And it's quite interesting that apparently everyone thinks higher levels are OK for workers compare to bystanders. Is that bc the workers are wearing protective gear, or because they are just more expendable?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


[ Parent ]
Well actually worker exposure is usually higher than public (4.00 / 3)
I've asked about that several times as shop steward and gotten every answer under the sun. Sometimes it is elevated just because the chemical is considered indispensable and workers have to be exposed.

I could be because the workers are bound by compensation schedules. The bystanders have more rights than workers because they have the freedom of tort.

It probably boils down to a little bit the bystanders didn't ask for it and the representatives don't really give a crap about the workers but I don't have a real answer.

As far as a diary, sorry but I'm not up to the task, feeling poorly.      


[ Parent ]
protective gear (4.00 / 1)
I cannot imagine Central Valley farmworkers wearing protective gear. I guess that leaves your other option.

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox