Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Rachael Ray Goes To Washington

by: Senator Kirsten Gillibrand

Wed May 19, 2010 at 14:15:44 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
(I'm honored to have Sen. Gillibrand post on this site. Please give her a warm welcome. As you know, I have strong views about framing the health crisis in this country in terms of "obesity." I will link to my article on that in the comments. However, I have watched Sen. Gillibrand propose many wonderful food-related bills throughout her time in the Senate and I am confident that she is on the right (I mean correct) side of these issues.   - promoted by Jill Richardson)

Child obesity is a crisis in this country. Over the last 30 years, child obesity rates have reached historic highs - more than tripling from just 5 percent to nearly 18 percent today. We must make improving child nutrition a top priority. If we fail to get serious about this issue today, we will face very serious consequences down the road.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand :: Rachael Ray Goes To Washington
To get people focused on this emerging issue, I asked Rachael Ray to come to Washington last week to help me lobby my colleagues in Congress on the Child Nutrition bill.

Rachael is so much more than just another celebrity with a cause.  She likes to say that she will use "her big Sicilian mouth" to fight for what is important - and she does. She has already dedicated so much effort and energy to this cause through her non-profit organization, Yum-o!, empowering children and their families to develop healthy relationships with food and cooking.  

Like you, Rachael understands that when kids don't get healthy food at school, it holds them back not only in class but over the course of their entire lives. It leads to lower test scores, and serious health conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and depression. Ultimately, child obesity costs our country $150 billion per year in health care costs. As Rachael said last week, we can invest now and provide our children with healthy, nutritious food and education or pay a whole lot more in the years to come.  We must invest in improving the health of our children today.

Currently, the federal government provides just $2.68 to cover the labor, equipment and food cost of each eligible child's school lunch. This is outrageously low. The Child Nutrition bill we're moving forward in the Senate increases this reimbursement rate by 6 cents. It is a laudable start, but it is still not enough.

I believe we need a much more robust investment.  Investing 70 cents more in the reimbursement rate would enable schools to provide the healthy, nutritious meals our children need to lead healthy and successful lives.  Schools stand ready to help our children, but they need our support.

The minimum increase we should settle for is 10 cents per child, which is the amount that the Institute of Medicine has said is the minimum required to lead to any sort of meaningful improvement to our children's nutrition. This is also consistent with the amount that is provided in President Obama's budget put forth earlier this year.

But our advocacy can not end here. I'm also working to improve the Child and Adult Care Food program by adding dinner to the menu so that all of our children are getting access to three healthy meals each day. In addition, we absolutely must ban artificial trans fats from all school lunches and index school meal eligibility to cost of living so that families in high cost areas like New York City have fair access. Child obesity is a crisis and we need to treat it as one.

These are the issues I'm fighting for from my position on the Senate Agriculture Committee and I am so grateful to Rachael Ray for coming to DC to lend her support for this important fight. When she was here, we sat in front of a classroom of children at Payne Elementary School and spoke with them about what they're learning about healthy eating and nutrition. Children created art projects depicting a healthy plate of food, they told us what they learned about healthy eating and I believe these kids are on a path toward healthy fulfilling lives. Unfortunately, I'm afraid they're the exception, not the rule.

It is time for us in Congress to make this investment a top priority and take real steps toward ending our nation's childhood obesity epidemic.  Thank you Rachael for your advocacy.  I hope everyone else will join us in this important effort.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thanks once again Sen. Gillibrand (4.00 / 2)
and thank you for your leadership on food-related issues in the Senate.

For more explanation of my opposition to framing the problem as obesity, here is an article I wrote recently. I realize this is quite nuanced and when even the First Lady talks about the obesity epidemic, it's the most common way to refer to the overall problem of diet-related diseases, poor diet, and sedentary lifestyle. I hope you can continue your leadership on this issue by perhaps considering changing the way we talk about this so we can all measure our success as increased health instead of lower weight.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


Whee! (4.00 / 1)
I looked it up, thanks to your post. The darned bill FINALLY has been introduced! Good news, I was beginning to worry about what was being done to it somewhere in the shadows.

S.3307


Welcome Kirsten and (4.00 / 3)
thank you for your service and dedication to this issue as well as for the article here.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

Sugar (4.00 / 3)
The federal government at this point as absolutely no interest in regulating sugar, which is the subject of an extremely powerful industry lobby. To date, no standards whatsoever have been devised or instituted in federal nutrition policies. In school food circles, sugar is referred to as the "stealth" ingredient, the one processors use as a cheap source of calories instead of real, wholesome food. It's true that school meals could be made instantly healthier simply by restricting the amount of sugar they contain. The approach taken by the Institute of Medicine in the report it issued in October was to suggest that by setting minimum and maximum calorie limits for school meals, and requiring increased portions of vegetables and whole grains, there would be less room for "discretionary" calories in school meals, as from sugar and fat.

Ed Bruske aka The Slow Cook

[ Parent ]
IOM calories (4.00 / 1)
Right. Maxima recommended by IOM are less than present minima in most cases, and are not greater than present minima in any case. Minima recommended by IOM are about 80% of current minima.

The bill reported out of committee directed USDA to develop regulations implementing IOM recommendations (unlike the D.C. bill.) I hope this provision survives. If it does (no guarantees) new regs would not arrive for about three years.


[ Parent ]
Ooops (4.00 / 1)
S.3307 does not contain "Institute", "Medicine", or "IOM". I need to chase this.

[ Parent ]
whew. (4.00 / 1)
page 79 of 220 refers to

the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.

That's the IoM recommendations, I think.


[ Parent ]
sugar (4.00 / 2)
I am extremely disappointed that, in a 220-page bill, the word "sugar" is mentioned exactly zero times. How can this be?

Of all the things the reauthorization might do, restricting sugar seems to be simultaneously among the simplest and most effective possibilities.

What do you think are the chances of limiting sugar in school meals?


Careful with that 10 Cents Figure (4.00 / 2)
I don't recall the Institute of Medicine ever giving a figure as a "minimum required to lead to any sort of meaningful improvement to our childen's nutrition." The IOM dealt in standards for breakfast and lunch and what certain increased portion sizes of fruits, vegetables and whole grains would mean in terms of added costs to school meals. The did hazard some guesses what the costs might be for breakfast and for lunch. But I don't recall the IOM ever framing the question the way you have here and declaring a minimum required to improve school meals.

As I wrote on my blog on Feb. 17:

"A change in the meal requirements could have a major effect on the cost of food to school food authorities (SFAs) if there are large changes in the types and amounts of foods required by the standards for menu planning," the IOM panel reported. The panel said it could not predict exactly how much food costs might increase. But the IOM estimated that if students actually select the increased offerings of fruits, vegetables and whole grain products when they are in the meal line-which is, after all, the point of improving the standards-the cost of breakfast would likely rise 23 percent, lunch by 9 percent.

Ann Cooper has called for a $1 increase. The School Nutrition Association, representing food service directors across the country, has said that school food programs on average run a 35-cent deficit per meal. As far as I can tell, this 10 cent figure comes totally out of the blue. Can you give a reference for it?  

Ed Bruske aka The Slow Cook


Response from Senator Gillibrand's Internet Director (4.00 / 2)
Thank you for the comment. Just wanted to explain the "ten cents" figure the Senator cites. From IOM's Oct. 2009 School Meals report:

By estimating the costs of representative baseline menus and comparing them with those of baseline menus modified by the committee to meet the recommendations, the committee found that the foods costs for breakfast (as selected by the student) increased by 18 percent, largely because of the increase in fruit, and those for lunch (as selected) increased by 4 percent. These estimates are representative of the expected increase in food costs that are due to the recommended changes in menus, but they should be viewed with some caution, especially because students' food selections under the new Meal Requirements cannot be known in advance. If even higher percentages of students select the maximum amount of fruits and vegetables, the food costs for breakfast and lunch may increase up to 23 percent and 9 percent, respectively.

The 4 percent figure -- the minimum they anticipate costs of lunch rising by -- amounts to ten cents.

Proud to be Internet Director for Gillibrand For Senate.


[ Parent ]
10 Cents (4.00 / 2)
So it's an extrapolation from some fairly wild guesses the IOM committee made, saying "they should be viewed with some caution," and that if more students actually selected the maximum amount of fruits and vegetables (presumably we hope they would) the percent increase from the baseline would be more than double the "minimum" figure cited. Meaning, the 10 cent figure being used may or may not have any basis in reality. And what is the baseline amount that these percentages are extrapolating from to arrive at 10 cents? Where is that figure coming from?

Ed Bruske aka The Slow Cook

[ Parent ]
4% (4.00 / 1)
4% of $2.68 is about 11 cents? Doesn't answer your question, I know, just thought I'd throw it in.

[ Parent ]
4 Percent of What? (4.00 / 2)
The IOM was addressing the cost of food in the subsidized meal program, not the $2.68 federal reimbursement. That's why this 10 cent amount seems so goofy to me as a percentage. It doesn't correlate with any of the food costs I've seen in the IOM report. But here the senator is implying that it might also be the basis for the 10 cent figure promoted by the Obama administration, or is at least comparable. So far, the math around this 10 cent figure isn't working for me.

Ed Bruske aka The Slow Cook

[ Parent ]
committee podcasts (4.00 / 1)
Dear inet director,

I would love to be able to download audio podcasts of committee hearings. If Senator Gillibrand could get this service implememted by her committees, that would be great for the near term. Longer term, I would like to get audio podcasts of both House and Senate hearings, including those archived at C-SPAN.

Thanks, Todd.


[ Parent ]
closed captioning (4.00 / 1)
while we're wishing, let's provide closed captioning for committee hearing videos.

[ Parent ]
Yes... (4.00 / 1)
Please, thanks...

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox