Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Antibiotics in Our Food Can Kill Us

by: teacherken

Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 13:16:35 PM PST


Bookmark and Share
( - promoted by Jill Richardson)

A study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that in the United States, 70 percent of antibiotics are used to feed healthy livestock, with 14 percent more used to treat sick livestock. Only about 16 percent are used to treat humans and their pets, the study found.

I am not a scientist.  I already am limited in drugs I can use by allergies, for example, I cannot use penicillin (one of many).  Overuse of antibiotics creates resistant strains of bacteria, super bugs if you will.  My allergies perhaps make me more at risk than most people, since I am limited in alternatives

But it does not matter if the strain is resistant to all known antibiotics

MRSA, a kind of staph infection - kills about 18,000 Americans annually. That's more than die of AIDS.

Which is why you should read Nicholas Kristof this morning.

teacherken :: Antibiotics in Our Food Can Kill Us
In The Spread of Superbugs he tells us the story of a California executive, Thomas Dukes, whose life was torn apart in just a few days by a resistant strain of E. coli, ESBL-producing.  He probably got it from tainted beef.  That is, the beef had the E coli, but there would have been no immediate evidence one could have discovered short of testing the meat - the ordinary consumer is flying blind on this.   It is possible he also could have touched a contaminated surface, although consumption of tainted meat is far more likely according to the expert to whom Kristof refers, Dr. Brad Spellberg, an infectious-diseases specialist and the author of "Rising Plague," a book about antibiotic resistance.

You are a strict vegetarian and feeling smug?  

Vegetarians are also vulnerable to antibiotic resistance nurtured in hog barns. Microbes swap genes, so antibiotic resistance developed in pigs can jump to microbes that infect humans in hospitals, locker rooms, schools or homes.

Perhaps the bug originally remained contained in the colon of Mr. Dukes, and therefore did not threaten him.  In all likelihood something perforated his colon causing the bug to spread.  Now he has a colostomy bag, although he hopes at some point perhaps his colon will heal sufficiently and the bug will be eradicated from elsewhere in his body.  He hopes.  He of course cannot be sure.

But this is not about one executive and what he ate.  It is about all of us.

Let me repeat those statistics on antibiotic use:

70% for healthy livestock

14% for sick livestock

16% for humans and their pets

And that 16% is also inflated because some doctors over-prescribe.  We will have to address that as well, although that will be insufficient if we do not address the abusive use for healthy livestock.

Rep. Louise Slaughter of NY is a microbiologist, the only one in Congress.  She wants to curb the routine use of antibiotics in farming.  Her bill has 104 co-sponsors.  It is tied up in committee, blocked by those having the support of agribusiness.  The Senate has not acted, nor has the Obama administration taken up this cause.

Mr. Dukes' colon was perforated by an inflammation.  He had a stomach ache.  He saw his doctor, who gave him Cipro., a drug that had previously worked against the infection.  

This time, the pain grew worse. The next evening, he was in surgery to remove eight inches of his colon.

One person, one superbug?  Not hardly.  Consider Acinetobacter:

"We are seeing infections caused by Acinetobacter and special bacteria called KPC Klebsiella that are literally resistant to every antibiotic that is F.D.A. approved," Dr. Spellberg said. "These are untreatable infections. This is the first time since 1936, the year that sulfa hit the market in the U.S., that we have had this problem."

literally resistant to every antibiotic that is F.D.A. approved

which means that we have no way of fighting a massive outbreak.   Mr. Dukes survived because he was treated intravenously with another antibiotic that was able to help.  But what if it were a superbug resistant to all known and approved antibiotics?

The producers of hogs and other livestock view antibiotics as a cheap and effective way of increasing the weight of their animals, and thereby increasing their profits.

Cheap and effective for them.  Potentially devastating for the rest of us.

If people get sick because of their livestock they will lose their customer base.

If there are worries about the safety of their product, overseas markets will be closed to the affected American agricultural products - think of the impact of just a few incidents of mad cow disease or similar events among sheep.

Perhaps my allergies make me somewhat more at risk.  So perhaps you think my concern is selfish.  It is, and it is more than selfish.  There are those in our extended family who have almost died from E. coli.   In the cases in mind the strains were not resistant, and quick application of effective antibiotics made a difference.

I care about more than me and mine.  Hopefully you know that if you are a regular reader.

I care about more than my fellow Americans.  I care about humanity.

I also care about how we treat the animals who provide us with our main source of protein.  I am not a vegetarian, I am a true omnivore, as are most Americans.  We should not have to radically change our diets because of the great greed (it was a typo) of the large producers in agribusiness.  The health and safety of the American people should be paramount, even if we cannot pass meaningful health care reform.  

And the safety of American food is not only a health issue, it is a major economic issue as well, potentially for the large producers who are being so stubborn on this issue.

Agribusiness,  energy producers, health insurance companies -  the selfish concerns of any slice of the American economy should never carry greater weight than the health and safety and well-being - included economic well-being - of the American people.

Reserve the use of antibiotics to meaningful responses to infection.  If we do not act on this quickly, we may find that Thomas Dukes is not alone in finding his life in jeopardy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Crossposted from Daily Kos (4.00 / 3)
in response to a request from Jill.

Peace.


The reason they give the antibiotics to meat animals is only to make them (4.00 / 2)
... grow faster and put on weight more easily, as you said, in a very cheap way because the drugs are so cheap.  But it's not that much more weight, and a lot of the extra weight is going to not be usable protein, but fat to add marbling and flavor.

So if routine, automatic antibiotic use was phased out for healthy livestock, all producers would be then operating under the same conditions, would have to treat their animals in a way that they had less physical trauma and stress,  and it would not actually result in prices for the nutritious part going up that much. Meat might be leaner, and frying in oil might become a bit more popular.....    Compare this to the horror of not being able to treat infections caused by antibiotic resistance.

But it is not just the meat animals we should be worried about.  The great bagged spinach e coli contamination- spinach recall disaster in CA a few years back in 2006, it turns out that they never were able to pinpoint exactly where that strain of e coli came from, other than they suspected animal waste contamination had gotten onto the fields spring during flooding- that was one theory. They found a cattle ranch which was the very likely source, a mile away, and tried to blame it on wild pigs.  But the e coli was in the spinach itself, so just washing it did not kill the pathogens unless it was cooked.

In Dec of 2006 there was a second e coli outbreak sourced from Taco Bell, initially thought to be the green onions but then it turned out to be the iceberg lettuce, which was imported to the east coast from CA, again. No farm was pinpointed as the source.  Taco John's also had an e coli outbreak traced to bad lettuce which came thru Minneapolis, MN.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...
 


Chickens (4.00 / 1)
From a robust controlled study published in 2007 by researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health:

Growth Promoting Antibiotics in Food Animal Production: An Economic Analysis

Results. Positive production changes were associated with GPA use, but were insufficient to offset the cost of the antibiotics. The net effect of using GPAs was a lost value of $0.0093 per chicken (about 0.45% of total cost). Based upon these data, the authors found no basis for the claim that the use of GPAs lowers the cost of production. Note that this study does not include veterinary cost changes or changes in performance variability associated with the removal of GPAs.

Conclusions. This economic analysis is the first study to the authors' knowledge utilizing large-scale empirical data collected by U.S. industry, in which it is demonstrated that the use of GPAs in poultry production is associated with economic losses to the producers. These data are of considerable importance in the ongoing national debate concerning the continued use of antibiotics for growth promotion of food animals. Based on the industry study and the resulting economic impact, the use of GPAs in U.S. poultry production should be reconsidered.

The researchers studied chickens. I wonder what the results would be for other species.


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox