Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Federal Court May Halt Genetically Modified Sugar Beets Today

by: dsnodgrass

Fri Mar 05, 2010 at 08:48:37 AM PST


Bookmark and Share
(The judge made no immediate ruling today, so we need to stay tuned to this story to see what will happen. - promoted by Jill Richardson)

Currently, about half of the America's sugar supply comes from genetically modified sugar beets, which have been engineered to be resistant to Monsanto's Roundup herbicide. In a hearing scheduled to take place today in San Francisco, a federal judge could make a ruling which would order a nationwide halt to the planting and use of genetically modified sugar beets while the USDA conducts an environmental impact assessment - a process which could take two or three years. 

dsnodgrass :: Federal Court May Halt Genetically Modified Sugar Beets Today

The genesis of today's hearing goes to the USDA's 2004 fast-track approval of GMO sugar beets, an approval process which lacked an environmental impact report. This omission would come back to bite the USDA in September of 2009.

 

The federal district court for the Northern District of California ruled that the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, APHIS, violated the law when it failed to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement before deregulating sugar beets that were genetically engineered to be resistant to the herbicide glyphosate, marketed by Monsanto as Roundup.

Plaintiff groups Center for Food Safety, Organic Seed Alliance, Sierra Club, and High Mowing Seeds, represented by Earthjustice and the Center for Food Safety, filed suit against APHIS in January 2008.

They claimed that the agency failed to adequately assess the environmental, health, and associated economic impacts of allowing Roundup Ready sugar beets to be commercially grown without restriction. This failure to assess violates the National Environmental Policy Act, the court determined.

 

That ruling declares a violation of law for failing to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement, but that by itself doesn't prevent the production or use of the genetically modified sugar beets.

Meanwhile, organic farmers in the Oregon, where the majority of the Roundup ready sugar beets are grown, have a grievance of their own, saying that pollination from the genetically altered sugar beets gets carried by winds into their organic crops.

 

At issue is whether the genetically altered beets can corrupt natural varieties of beets and Swiss chard through cross pollination. The nation’s seed supply for both types of plants, altered and natural, is based in Oregon’s Willamette Valley. Organic seed producers there fear that once cross pollination takes place, farmers will have nothing but genetically modified seeds and consumers will have no choice but to eat crops with genetically modified origins.  

The Organic Seed Alliance, Center for Food Safety, High Mowing Organic Seeds and the Sierra Club filed a motion for injunction late Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court has already agreed on most of the grounds stated for banning the Roundup Ready seed.

Last September, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White found that the U.S. Department of Agriculture broke the law when it failed to take a “hard look” at the potential damage genetically altered beets posed to crops that were related but natural, like table beets, chard and sugar beets that weren’t genetically modified.

White ordered the USDA to go back and conduct a full environmental impact statement on the consequences of deregulating Roundup Ready beets. The USDA deregulated the beets in 2005. They were planted commercially in 2008 and quickly became the seed of choice among sugar beet farmers, who saw cost benefits to planting a crop resistant to the powerful plant killer glyphosate, marketed as Roundup. Weed control is costly with sugar beets and non-Roundup Ready beets varieties required a cocktail of different herbicides for weed control. The promise of Roundup Ready crops was that using a single chemical would be cheaper and that less spraying would be required because of Roundup’s potency.

But the genetically altered plant’s effects on its natural cousins weren’t vetted.

 

The judge can rule today, or take the matter into consideration.


Version cross-posted at Celsias.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
here's an article on what happened: (4.00 / 2)
judge made no immediate ruling on GM sugar beets

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

Thank you. (4.00 / 2)
I wonder what time that article was posted. I looked for something a couple of hours ago and didn't see anything. Doesn't mean it wasn't already up, though.

[ Parent ]
Thanks for following up Jill. (4.00 / 2)
It's anticipated that Judge White will rule on the injunction sometime during this next week. I have no idea which way this will go, but this judge has, in the past, taken positions which support those who filed the injunction to stop the gmo sugar beets.

FYI, the judge is the same who made the September ruling which found that the USDA broke the law by not doing the environmental impact statement.

Stay tuned...


[ Parent ]
Capital Press ran an article on this (0.00 / 0)
a couple months ago. One of the problems that sugar beet farmers will face if the crop is banned untill the EIS is produced is that now that the RR sugar beets are so common, there's not much seed left of the non RR varieties.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.

Has anyone looked into the availability (4.00 / 1)
of Non-GMO sugar beet seed?

The argument that it's too late to source Non-GMO seed sounds too contrived; unless the fix is already in to make sure Non-GMO seed not available.


I wouldn't say that a fix is in (4.00 / 1)
I think it's more a matter of a massive shift from non-GMO beet seed to the GMO over the past 5 years because the farmers using it are seeing more profitability and/or higher yields with lower expenses.

You only have to use one weed killer instead of several, little or no labor weeding, less equipment to just spray the whole field, reduce costs. All the usual reasons for switching from one product to another, in this case from non-GMO to RR. And besides, the government said it was OK, yes?

In 5 years, how many seed cleaning operations and seed producers can go out of business, be bought up, or shift to producing seed for different crops?

You know, saving and cleaning seed ain't no easy thing, and if you're doing that for a crop grown on thousands of acres, well....

Probably the only people who have access to much in the way on non-GMO seed for sugar beets, at least in the USA, are the organic growers, and wouldn't they be pissed if someone came in and bought up a lot of their seed.

But more likely, if the sugar beet growers can't get the seed they need, they'll go to different crops untill they can get the seed back.

Normal people scare me.... But not as much as I scare them.


[ Parent ]
Two years. (0.00 / 0)
First commercial planting was 2008.

one weed killer instead of several

That's an example of what I mean by "things growers learn from seed salesmen." It isn't true.

I'll post a link for a Roundup label, replete with instructions for using with other herbicides, because Roundup isn't the sole solution, especially when the fields are full of Roundup-tolerant weeds.

The main benefit conferred by Roundup-ready varieties is, the grower can use more herbicide without killing the crop.


[ Parent ]
globalization (4.00 / 1)
Could this be an instance of globalization saving the day? Even if the U.S. inventory isn't enough for a full crop, seems like enough should be available from someplace in the world, doesn't it? And if there is not enough U.S. inventory, that would seem like very poor planning. The judge made the first ruling last summer - wouldn't prudent managers have a "just in case" plan?

Whether the potential seed shortage is contrived or not, the situation seems totally unreasonable to me. How can farmers think it in their best interests, or in the national interest, to cede nearly 100% control of the seed supply for an entire crop to one seed company? Makes no sense. Furthermore, surely beet farmers are aware that many weeds already are glyphosphate-tolerant, protection lasts only for a few years, and using these products leads to more herbicide use, not less. Or don't beet farmers have the same information that everyone else has? Do they learn everything they know about this from seed salesmen and advertisements in the trade mags?


Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox