Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Elanco Markets Unsafe Animal Drug as "Green"

by: Jill Richardson

Wed Feb 03, 2010 at 09:11:31 AM PST


Bookmark and Share
I recently heard a presentation by the President of Elanco - a division of Eli Lilly. He's shopping his presentation (and accompanying whitepaper) around to industry leaders and government officials (in the U.S. and abroad) to tout his company's products. The whitepaper refers to its drug Paylean by saying:

"Use of an FDA-approved feed additive for swine can reduce manure production in pigs by 8 percent."

and

"an FDA-approved swine feed additive could enable the U.S. to maintain pork production levels while raising 11 million fewer hogs. This would also reduce demand for cropland used to grow feed grains by more than 2 million acres."

These are offered as reasons why Elanco's products are "green." They aren't just smart for a farmer's bottom line - they are good for the earth! But that's not the whole picture. A new expose by Alternet shows that Ractopamine (a.k.a. Paylean) is unsafe for humans and cruel to animals. This drug is administered in the last stage of the animal's life, and up to 20 percent of it remains in the animal's tissue at slaughter. This is a drug labeled "Not for use in humans. Individuals with cardiovascular disease should exercise special caution to avoid exposure. Use protective clothing, impervious gloves, protective eye wear, and a NIOSH-approved dust mask." That's not something I'd want to eat.

Alternet also says:

Where was mention of the farmer phone calls to Elanco reporting, "hyperactivity," "dying animals," "downer pigs" and "tying up" and "stress" syndromes, asks the FDA letter. Where was the log of phone calls that included farmers saying, "animals are down and shaking," and "pig vomiting after eating feed with Paylean"?

Wow. No wonder the President of Elanco refers to this drug anonymously when he presents on how sustainable and fantastic his company is. If he told people what he was selling, they'd know he's full of it. This drug is banned in 160 countries, so why is it legal here?

Jill Richardson :: Elanco Markets Unsafe Animal Drug as "Green"
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Full of it. (4.00 / 2)
Indeed.

If ractopamine is a good thing, why administer it for only a short time before slaughter? Well, if brief end-of-life dosing causes 10%  mortality, presumably longer dosing might cause up to 100% mortality. Bad for business, doncha know, and increasing consumer mortality could also be bad for business.

FDA puts this stuff in hogs, cattle, and turkeys - what's next? Chicken, surely. And Canada usually apes FDA attitudes, so I suppose it will be in farmed salmon soon, if it isn't already?

Did you notice, gentle readers? Not one word of profanity?


ha! no profanity from me? (4.00 / 2)
I can work on that.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Both of us (4.00 / 1)
are known models of rectitude.

[ Parent ]
oh - you mean none from you. (4.00 / 2)
what happened? You had your coffee?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
I won't eat meat (4.00 / 3)
It's simply filthy and full of nasty chemicals. The meat industry continues to consolidate. When there's an e coli scare, it often involves hundreds of thousands of pounds because the slaughterhouses are so massive.

Marketing (4.00 / 3)
a product as "green" is today's equivalent to pasting the (non)word "Microwaveable" on everything.

"Low Fat" worked for while, until people realized that there is no fat in a 5lb. bag of sugar.

As long as it doesn't cause anal leakage, people will consume just about anything.

Yuck. Thanks for letting me know, but Yuck. Another reason to eat only food I grow myself.

If only I had the time.


Everything is related. (4.00 / 2)
Jay pointed out that Obama's budget proposal includes the bullet point

$54 million discretionary funding increase to promote U.S. agricultural exports by developing and maintaining overseas markets and reducing foreign trade barriers and other practices that hinder U.S. agricultural exports.

Surely Obama expects our international trade negotiators to eliminate bans on U.S. meat with ractopamine residues.


But of course... (4.00 / 1)
I mean, you can't be against "trade" now can you?  I mean, that would make you a commie, or a Terris' State or something like that...

Coming soon to a Philadelphia near you!

[ Parent ]
trade (4.00 / 2)
Jay, I have a killer agate shooter that I'll trade straight up for 10 clearies or, if you happen to have a malachite mib, let's deal.

[ Parent ]
Canada (4.00 / 2)
Yup, Canada approves the use of ractopamine for feeding at least some edible animal. Can't find much about this, though. Time and again, reports say that the use of ractopamine is approved in 24 countries or more than 20 countries, but I can't find out which countries those are. (The 2009 European Food Safety Authority report, Safety evaluation of ractopamine, says "about 25" countries permit its use.) Is the number a handout from Elanco? Is it true? Is the country list secret to protect certain countries from experiencing some kind of backlash?

Many reports also say the chemical is banned in 160 countries, but I can't find that list either. Does Russia ban it? I don't know. The E.U. does, does every country in the U.K. ban it? Probably not, but I'm only guessing.

Aggregating available reports, I get the following list of countries that allow use of ractopamine.

Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, and Spain

With the exception of Japan, we import significant amounts of beef and/or pork from all those countries.

I can't discover whether ractopamine is used in Argentina.


I'm regulatorily confused. (4.00 / 2)
Regulatorally?

Anyway...this toxin is used in edible animals. In the U.S., meat and edible animal wastes are regulated by the U.S.D.A., but use of ractopamine in edible animals was approved by FDA? I'm no regulatory expert, that's for sure, and I suppose this does have some regulatory rationale. Nevertheless, I can't help but note that FDA approval did not include any regulations or constraints about use (aside from whatever Elanco wants to put on the product label), nor did it require labeling of edible meat-like products adulterated with ractopamine residues. (What's in that Ball Park hot dog, sports fans?) Any meat-like product from animals finished on ractopamine must contain residues of the toxin, because dosing continues until the time of slaughter.

Did Clinton's USDA pressure Clinton's FDA to approve ractopamine?

Note that USDA is our main agency of interaction with the Codex Alimentarius Commission.

Additive Used in U.S. Meat Production May Be Too Dangerous Even for Codex

Friday, July 31, 2009 by: Barbara L. Minton, citizen journalist

(NaturalNews) The latest session of the U.N. Codex Alimentarius ended without final adoption of a maximum residue level for ractopamine, a feed additive widely used in pork and beef production. The commission agreed to review additional information on the drug to be submitted by China, a country that has outlawed its use. Although this is very good news for meat eaters, the U.S. delegation to Codex expressed disappointment in the commission's decision to delay adoption of a minimum residue level for ractopamine, and urged that the review of information from China be completed by the Codex meeting in July, 2010. The National Pork Producers Council has been pushing the commission to adopt a minimum residue level for ractopamine, even though no evidence has surfaced to suggest its use is safe for animals or for the humans that consume products from animals bulked up with this drug.
...

Although there have been no long term studies of the effects of ractopamine in humans and no data exists to determine the outcome of long-term exposure to the chemical, short-term animal studies have shown destabilization of heart rate, reduced testicular and uterine weight, and heart weight increase. Studies using rats have shown reduction in mean litter size and an increase in total number of fetuses that fail to develop.

According to the EFSA report linked above, there have been no double-blind studies in humans at all. None. The one study we know about used six volunteers, short term.

I used the word "toxin" in this comment. Ractopamine is a phenylethanolamine, one of a class of chemicals that are generally pretty toxic.

Jill Richardson has written previously about the precautionary principle. Hmmm...


Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox