Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Report: GM Crops Make Pesticide Use Go UP!

by: Jill Richardson

Sat Nov 21, 2009 at 21:45:37 PM PST


Bookmark and Share
A new report, Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Thirteen Years, found that GM crops have resulted in an increase in overall pesticide use. I'd heard this anecdotally from farmers but now it's been confirmed. The report was done by The Organic Center, Union of Concerned Scientists, and the Center for Food Safety. By their math, GM crops have resulted in an extra 383 million pounds of herbicides between 1996 and 2008. Simultaneously, the GM crops resulted in a 64 million pound decrease in insecticide use. Together, that equals an overall increase of pesticide use by 318 million pounds.
Jill Richardson :: Report: GM Crops Make Pesticide Use Go UP!
According to the report:

Farmers planted 941 million acres of [genetically modified herbicide tolerant] corn, soybeans, and cotton from 1996 through 2008.  [Herbicide tolerant] soybeans accounted for two-thirds of these acres. Bt corn and cotton were grown on 357 million acres, with corn accounting for 79% of these acres. Th us, about 1.3 billion trait acres of [herbicide tolerant] and Bt crops have been grown between 1996 and 2008.

Here's a question I have about the report. They say:

Bt corn and cotton have delivered consistent reductions in insecticide use totaling 64.2 million pounds over the 13 years. Bt corn reduced insecticide use by 32.6 million pounds, or by about 0.1 pound per acre.  Bt cotton reduced insecticide use by 31.6 million pounds, or about 0.4 pounds per acre planted.

Is that a reduction of additional pesticides or total pesticides? Bt crops produce their own pesticide. You might be spraying nothing on them, or maybe you still spray but you spray less than you used to, but just because you aren't spraying as much doesn't mean you aren't using pesticides. You're using them because the plant is producing them. You just aren't spraying additional pesticides on your crops.

UPDATE: Apparently the amount of Bt produced by the corn and cotton were too difficult to measure. The decrease is just a decrease in additional pesticides sprayed - it does not include the amount of Bt produced by the crops.

Aside from that, here's a really interesting tidbit from the report:

GE crops reduced overall pesticide use in the first three years of commercial introduction (1996-1998) by 1.2%, 2.3%, and 2.3% per year, but increased pesticide use by 20% in 2007 and by 27% in 2008.

Uh, whoops... it was all working so well until the weeds evolved resistance to glyphosate (Roundup)! Here's what's happening:

GR [Glyphosate-resistant] weeds were practically unknown before the introduction of RR [Roundup Ready] crops in 1996.  Today, nine or more GR weeds collectively infest millions of acres of U.S. cropland. Thousands of fields harbor two or more resistant weeds. The South is most heavily impacted, though resistant weeds are rapidly emerging in the Midwest, and as far north as Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan.  In general, farmers can respond to resistant weeds on acres planted to HT crops in five ways:

  • Applying additional herbicide active ingredients,
  • Increasing herbicide application rates,
  • Making multiple applications of herbicides
    previously sprayed only once,
  • Through greater reliance on tillage for weed
    control, and
  • By manual weeding

In the period covered by this report, the first three of the above five responses have been by far the most common, and each increases the pounds of herbicides applied on HT [herbicide tolerant] crop acres.

GR pigweed (Palmer amaranth) has spread dramatically across the South since the first resistant populations were confirmed in 2005, and already poses a major threat to U.S. cotton production.  Some infestations are so severe
that cotton farmers have been forced to abandon cropland, or resort to the preindustrial practice of "chopping cotton" (hoeing weeds by hand).

Resistant horseweed (marestail) is the most widely spread and extensive glyphosate-resistant weed.  It emerged first in Delaware in the year 2000, and now infests several million acres in at least 16 states of the South and Midwest, notably Illinois.  GR horseweed, giant ragweed, common
waterhemp, and six other weeds are not only driving substantial increases in the use of glyphosate, but also the increased use of more toxic herbicides, including paraquat and 2,4-D, one component of the Vietnam War defoliant, Agent Orange.

Want some more good news?

One major biotech company has applied for and received a patent covering HT crops that can be directly sprayed with herbicide products falling within seven or more different herbicide families of chemistry. These next-generation HT crops will likely be sprayed with two or three times the number of herbicides typically applied today on fields planted with HT seeds, and the total pounds of herbicides applied on HT crops, and the cost of herbicides, will keep rising as a result.

Can you say "oy vey"?

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
overall increase of (4.00 / 1)
by 318 million pounds.

You might have heard this anecdotally from farmers, perhaps from farmers who increased their own use, but is just one in a string of studies that noted increased use after the first three years following introduction.

RE: Bt - only a few pests other than the European corn borer have so far been confirmed to be killed by the Bt trait. Additional pesticides continue to be used for the pests that the Bt trait does not deter.

RE: Weed resistance - remember that Monsanto did not invent glyphosphate resistance gene, they merely took it from a natural wild plant and incorporated it in crop plants. (I read or heard that a Monsanto employee discovered a weed growing in a toxic waste dump.) Monsanto knew from the beginning that all natural weed populations contain glyphosphate-resistant subpopulations which is what a Roundup label brochure forthrightly proclaims today. Whatever they told farmers and regulators Monsanto knew from the beginning that eventually we would have millions of acres, followed by tens of millions of acres, then hundreds of millions of fields with Roundup-resistant weeds.

I'll find a label and post the link. I neglected to save it in my favorites.

Weed resistance is not the only cause of increased herbicide use. Remember what the situation used to be. Arbitrarily say that farmers used three herbicides, and applied Herbicide A at the rate of 5 pounds per acre, Herbicide B at 5 pounds per acre, and Herbicide C at 5 pounds per acre. This practice was used because using any one of the herbicides at the rate of 15 pounds per acre would have killed the crop as well as the weeds. Even so, the total amount of applied herbicide needed to be limited to avoid killing the crop. Using RoundupReady seeds removed this limitation, and herbicide use increased as soon as farmers realized this, before the appearance of significant weed resistance.

RE: Applying additional herbicide active ingredients - I believe Monsanto's first response to weed resistance was to change the surfactant carrier formulation. By the bye, not that this matters, but a Roundup MSDS lists two ingredients, an active ingredient (one of the glyphosphate salts) and an "other" ingredient. The "other" ingredient is not an inert or inactive ingredient. The "other" ingredient is not identified in any way because of a "proprietary" claim. The "other" ingredient is the surfactant or surfactant package.

"Applying additional herbicide active ingredients" of course includes using other herbicides in conjuction with Roundup. Monsanto originally promised that using RoundupReady seeds would enable farmers to use fewer herbicides, if not less herbicide poundage. They might still nake this claim today to people who are ignorant of the facts, such as U.S. politicians, foreign regulators, and farmers all over the world. Nevertheless, a Roundup label brochure gives detailed guidance for using Roundup in conjunction with atrazine and all the other herbides tha RoundupReady farmers used to use and still use to this day.

GE crops have been a bonanza for the herbicide industry. Think about it - why would Monsanto want to sell seeds that would reduce the use of herbicides?



I forgot to say (4.00 / 1)
oy vey.

[ Parent ]
Monsanto label brochure and MSDS (4.00 / 1)
Monsanto biocide MSDS and label brochures page

Examples:

Roundup PowerMAX Herbicide label brochure

Roundup PowerMAX Herbicide MSDS

I just learned something - SoapBlox doesn't like the superscript TM thingy.


[ Parent ]
Roundup good, yum (4.00 / 1)
One of my favorite parts of the PowerMAX label brochure - please go to page 9/51, section 9.9.1, Sugarcane ripening. Sorry I can't figure out how to copy/paste it.

[ Parent ]
correction (4.00 / 1)
I'll correct one of the many typos in that comment. I wrote

Monsanto knew from the beginning that all natural weed populations contain glyphosphate-resistant subpopulations

I should have written "could contain" or "might contain."


[ Parent ]
Excellent comment (4.00 / 2)
You just said a lot of the things I was going to say.

One of the weeds the RR farmers are having to deal with is Amaranth, I think the big problem plant is Palmer Amaranth. It shows up in cotton and soy fields, and a mature plant can bring your equipment to a stand still, the things get big and have a trunk on them like a small tree.

I can understand why farmers would go to RR crops, and would spray the chemical(s). They used to hire crews that hand weeded the fields. Costs more to hire a crew, and with the ag labor situation the way it is, crews are hard to find. So they go to spraying. Years later, now the weeds have become RR too, and it's not hard to find crews to hand weed your field, it's next to impossible.

As someone who's fields were inundated with amaranth this year, I can sympathize with a farmer who uses RR seed and sprays. Fortunate for me, the stuff in my gardens is edible, and what I don't eat myself or peddle to my CSA share holders, will be going down to the produce stand. But for someone with 50 acres of soy or cotton, that's not a cost effective solution.

Regarding locavores as elitists - explain to me how supporting local business is elitist....


[ Parent ]
Amaranth (4.00 / 1)
Does Roundup kill Palmer amaranth? I don't know. In the PowerMax label brochure, the only mention of amaranth is as a leafy crop (Chinese spinach) on which Roundup is safe to use as directed. Perhaps there is a way to use it that kills amaranth.

[ Parent ]
Palmer amaranth (4.00 / 1)
Uh-oh. Jill already cited Palmer Amaranth. And from the wiki,

Amaranthus palmeri

Palmer amaranth is a fast-growing weed that has been noted as a threat to production of genetically modified cotton and soybean crops in the southern United States because in many places, the plant has developed resistance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the widely-used broadleaf herbicide Roundup. Resistant Glyphosate pigweed does not only dominate in cotton fields,it has wide ranging effects on other crops and productions as well. In the fall of 2005, North Carolina researchers collected Palmer pigweed by seed from 280 fields from Virginia border to South Carolina border. However, in 2001 Palmer amaranthus was found in the southern quarter of Illinois and appeared to be moving to northern Illinois in 2006.



[ Parent ]
Same here... (4.00 / 2)
(I read or heard that a Monsanto employee discovered a weed growing in a toxic waste dump.)

I know I read that in Lisa Weasel's recent book Food Fray, which I sent to Jill a few months ago so I can't look it up right now...

But what I remember is just like you said - and it was discovered growing in their own waste area / dump...

Coming soon to a Philadelphia near you!


[ Parent ]
Propaganda (4.00 / 2)
The report Jill cites, and the numberous similar studies that preceded it, prove that the biocide industry's claims of reduced biocide use are and have been nothing but expensive propaganda.

This strikes me now: agribusiness claims that the world will starve unless nations adopt the dominant U.S. agricultural model are nothing but similarly expensive, similarly dishonest propaganda. Those claims are, unfortunately, the basis for U.S. ag, aid, and food policy in the international sphere.


Herbicide resistance (0.00 / 0)
Still cogitating...if every natural wild weed population could have or might have a subpopulation that is resistant to glyphosphate salts, then isn't it self-evident that maize varieties also might have or could have subpopulations that are resistant to glyphosphate salts? Perhaps Roundup tolerance could have been bred into corn varieties with selective breeding. Easy to trial - plant thousands of acres with a number of maize varieties, spray emerged crops with normally lethal doses of Roundup or any other herbicide, any surviving individuals are resistant to the herbicide.

Hmmm. The unwanted consequences of introducing herbicide resistance traits or insecticide resistance traits would not be less undesirable because the traits are the result of selective breeding instead of genetic engineering.

This thought experiment tells me that the wide community of politicians, agronomy experts, regulators, and others needs a better basis for thinking about trait introduction than whether the trait is the result of genetic engineering or selective breeding.


Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox