Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Is Chicken Going the Way of Beef?

by: Jill Richardson

Wed Oct 07, 2009 at 14:22:28 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
The group R-CALF USA is asking the U.S. government to block a proposed merger between JBS and Pilgrim's Pride. Agriculture is an extremely consolidated sector, with only a few major players at the top of practically every industry. But as concentrated as pork, chicken, and turkey each are, beef puts them all to shame. Now it looks like JBS is seeking to do the same in the broiler industry.

As of 2007, the market share of the top 4 companies in each industry were as follows:

Beef: 83.5%
Broilers: 58.5%
Turkey: 55%
Pork: 66%

Beef was already topping the list back in 1990 when the top 4 companies controlled 72% of the market, but in recent years, a number of major mergers and acquisitions have really increased the power of the companies at the top. First JBS merged with Swift. At that point, here's how the market looked:

2007 Daily Slaughter Capacity
1. Tyson: 36,000 head
2. Cargill: 28,300 head
3. Swift & Co: 16,759 head
4. National Beef Packing Co: 13,000 head

Then JBS/Swift went after National Beef and Smithfield. The Smithfield merger went through - the National Beef one didn't. Now JBS wants to merge with Pilgrim's Pride, the largest broiler producer in the U.S. Pilgrim's Pride is based in Texas, where a favorite dish is "chicken-fried steak." I suppose this merger is an inversion of that - instead of making beef resemble a chicken, the merger would make the chicken industry resemble beef.

The Obama Administration's Dept of Justice has said they plan to go after monopolies in agriculture, specifically pointing to the seed and dairy industries. But if they want us to think they are serious about trust busting, they better do something about the meat packing industry as well.

I've posted R-CALF USA's statement about this merger below.

Jill Richardson :: Is Chicken Going the Way of Beef?
Group Asks State Attorneys General to Help Block JBS/ Pilgrim's Pride Merger

Billings, Mont. - R-CALF USA has contacted the 17 state attorneys general who, last year, helped to block JBS S.A.'s (JBS') acquisition of National Beef Packing Co. (National Beef), to request they step in to prevent the merger of JBS and Pilgrim's Pride Corp. (Pilgrim's Pride). The group will contact the remaining 33 state attorneys general later this week to request the same assistance.

"To protect both the farmers and ranchers within your state whose economic viability is wholly dependent on robust competition, and to protect the consumers within your state who deserve both choice and competitively priced meat products, we urge you to encourage the Department of Justice to take enforcement action to block the proposed JBS/Pilgrim's Pride merger," wrote R-CALF USA President/Region IV Director Max Thornsberry. "We also encourage you to join with the Department of Justice to ensure that this anticompetitive merger does not take place.

"Today, we are faced with a new merger proposal by JBS that, like its proposal in 2008, would further reduce competition in U.S. meat and cattle markets and harm U.S. consumers and U.S. producers," he continued. "JBS now proposes to acquire Pilgrim's Pride, the largest poultry broiler company in the United States, and we are once again seeking your assistance to prevent the further loss of competition, as well as to protect both consumers and producers against anticompetitive trade practices.

"The foundation for our concern is that beef and poultry are competing, substitute protein products in the consumer market and that the merger would allow JBS to arbitrarily increase and decrease poultry production and/or raise and lower poultry prices within its fully integrated poultry division to manipulate both the demand for beef and the price for live cattle," Thornsberry pointed out.

R-CALF USA believes the merger of JBS and Pilgrim's Pride would violate U.S. antitrust laws, as it would reduce competition between the competing proteins - beef and poultry - and enable JBS to greatly increase its exercise of market power to the detriment of both U.S. cattle producers and U.S. meat consumers," he said.

To substantiate its concerns, R-CALF USA has sent two separate submissions to the U.S. Department of Justice, which urge the Justice Department to take enforcement action against the merger.

"In addition to lower cattle prices paid to U.S. cattle producers, we are concerned that the savings to JBS resulting from lower cattle prices (which we have estimated to be as high as $2.4 billion annually) likely would not be passed on to consumers as evidenced by the current disconnect between live cattle prices received by U.S. cattle producers and retail beef prices paid by consumers," the letter states. "This disconnect is itself evidenced both by the growing spread between live cattle prices and retail beef prices, as well as the fact that cattle feeders have been experiencing long-run financial losses while beef prices have risen to record highs and remain at near record levels."

Background: JBS, based in Brazil, is the world's largest beef packer. In mid-2007, JBS acquired Swift & Co., then the third-largest beef packer in the United States. In late-2008, JBS acquired Smithfield Beef Group Inc., then the fifth-largest U.S. beef packer. This 2008 acquisition enabled JBS to gain control of approximately 25 percent of all the fed cattle slaughter in the United States. In addition, it put in the hands of JBS control of the largest U.S. cattle feeding company, Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding, representing an unprecedented level of vertical integration for JBS in particular, and for the U.S. cattle industry as a whole. Also in late-2008, the U.S. Department of Justice, 17 state attorneys general initiated enforcement action that successfully blocked JBS' attempt to acquire National Beef, the fourth-largest beef packer in the United States. Presently, JBS and three other beef packers control over 85 percent of all the fed cattle slaughter in the United States.  

# # #


R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) is a national, non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on trade and marketing issues. Members are located across 47 states and are primarily cow/calf operators, cattle backgrounders, and/or feedlot owners. R-CALF USA directors and committee chairs are extremely active unpaid volunteers. R-CALF USA has dozens of affiliate organizations and various main-street businesses are associate members. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com  or, call 406-252-2516.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The 83.5% slaughterhouse CR4 (4.00 / 1)
is for 2003, unless there is a typo in your source document. The feedlot capacity is 2006 data, reported in 2007.

In a Deconstructing Dinner episode from March 2009, Jon Steinman reported that the U.S. beef slaughterhouse CR4 was 69%. (Cargill 21%, Tyson 26%.) He did not cite sources.

In Canada, according to that broadcast, Nilsson Bros./XL Foods owns about 50% of slaughterhouse capacity and Cargill owns about 40%. Nilsson owns about 100% of large auction lots, giving them massive ability to control and manipulate Canadian prices. Does this foreshadow the direction of U.S. meat industries?

The magnificence of your statistical compilation is awesome, and I'm not sure there is a better way to do it. Nevertheless, in the NAFTA era, something seems to be lacking in compilations that provide U.S.-only numbers, or Canada-only numbers, or Mexico-only numbers. If nothing else, we should all be reminded from time to time that we are all interrelated.


XL and Excel (0.00 / 0)
Interesting note, while Nilsson's beef operations are wrapped up as XL Foods, Cargill beef and pork products are marketed as Excel Fresh Meats.

[ Parent ]
oops (4.00 / 1)
I got this from the Heffernan report... was the mistake mine or theirs?

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Not obvious. (0.00 / 0)
A note in the Hefferman document (published 2007) says the CR4 is from a 2003 report, but that might be incorrect? A sidebar table shows CR4 (2005) = 83.5%. I see a lack of rigor, but I don't know where the error is.

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox