Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

The End of Overeating

by: Jill Richardson

Fri Sep 18, 2009 at 19:13:45 PM PDT


Bookmark and Share
Today I posted a piece on the food blog Zester Daily called "Trained to Get Fat." In it, I focused quite a bit on David Kessler's new book The End of Overeating. Kessler goes through the biological reasons WHY humans overeat, and then explains precisely how food companies and marketers exploit that tendency to ensure that we frequently DO overeat.
Jill Richardson :: The End of Overeating
Kessler begins with the introduction of the term "hyperpalatable foods" - foods that are tastier and more irresistible than anything found in nature. In fact, I found that there's a stark difference between foraged foods and domesticated foods (for example, Bing or Rainier cherries are MUCH bigger and sweeter than wild black cherries). But when we're dealing with domesticated foods, we're still dealing with something that evolved in nature in its unrefined form.

The problem is when you go from sweet corn to high fructose corn syrup: from a natural form of food to something that never existed in nature. Our bodies are programmed to favor sweet, salty, and fatty foods due to an evolutionary need to pile on the calories when they were available to avoid starvation. But just because the highly refined junk that's available (and ubiquitous!) today never existed in nature doesn't mean that our evolved favoring of sugar, salt, and fat turns off when we eat those "hyperpalatable" foods. We just keep eating and eating and eating.

What happens to those who overeat (which is a large percentage of us - myself included!) is that we get conditioned to overeat these hyperpalatable foods. Kessler calls it conditioned hypereating. Maybe the first time you saw the Golden Arches, you thought, "Hmm, am I hungry today? Yes! I am. I'll get a burger." Over time, you become conditioned to cues - the sight of the Golden Arches, the smell of McDonald's fries, etc. At a certain point it becomes automatic. See McDonalds, eat a burger. Or eat an entire supersized value meal. You don't even wonder if you're hungry before doing it. You just act automatically as you are conditioned to do by those cues.

Furthermore, whereas hyperpalatable food may be possible to resist before you've taken a bite of it, it's MUCH harder to resist it AFTER you've taken a bite. Kessler says that but I find it to be true in my own life with a particular brand of coconut milk ice cream I love. I can't buy a pint because I eat the whole thing in two sittings. There's no such thing as "just one spoonful" or even "just one serving." But I can resist it BEFORE I've taken a taste, by not buying it at all.

My favorite part of the book is the section in which he exposes how restaurants actually make their food, and why it's so difficult to eat normal portions. He's not referring to fine dining, but rather to places like T.G.I. Fridays, Chili's, or Applebees. It's one thing if there's a chef in the kitchen who is cooking food from scratch using similar ingredients and methods to what you could use (if you had the skills) in your own kitchen. It's entirely another thing altogether when the food is engineered to be irresistible and constructed via industrial processes long before it gets to the restaurant. One of Kessler's examples is Cinnabon, citing how much work went into creating the perfect cinnamon bun.

So what do we do about this conditioned hypereating and the public health disaster it's become? Kessler gives advice for individuals who wish to curb their overeating, and I find his advice to be incredibly helpful, at least in part. He doesn't identify good or bad foods, but instead relies on his readers to identify which foods they overeat and focus on those. But assuming readers DO know how to eat and they are in touch with which foods cause them to totally lose control, his advice meshes very well with what I've experienced in my own life.

Kessler says you should rely on rules instead of willpower. Instead of saying "I oughta eat less sweets," make the rule of "No dessert." When your brain knows that something is not an option for you, it's MUCH easier to resist whatever that thing is. I find this to be true in my flirtations with veganism. If I tell myself I am vegan and I cannot have ANY animal products whatsoever, I do fine with it. I miss my lattes and gelato and all kinds of junk that I thoroughly enjoy, but it's not a problem of self control. Once I tell myself that I'm not vegan and I'm a vegetarian who tries to go easy on the dairy and eggs, it's all over. Lattes, yogurt, cookies, scones, muffins, cake, ice cream, cheese, you name it. If I can get in my hands on it, it goes in my mouth. I don't like the extremist nature of veganism but as Kessler says, rules work far better than willpower. In other words, relying on willpower to be a near-vegan is not going to work for me.

I am hesitant to criticize Kessler because his book does an excellent job in what he set out to do. His focus is solely on individuals, not the role of the government. But one cannot ignore the fact that he WAS the commissioner of the FDA, and he is one of the best public figures in the country to speak up on this topic. He's shown that food companies exploit their customers, to the detriment of the customers' health. We all know this is a public health epidemic. When business is being predatory on such a large scale, it's time for government to step in. Yet Kessler calls for very little government action.

I'm pleased to say that Kessler calls for two of the same measures I call for in my own book - nutrition labeling on chain restaurant menus and labeling of added sugars on packaged foods. I wonder about the added sugars because the Center for Science in the Public Interest has petitioned the FDA for years to require labeling of added sugars on packaged foods, and the FDA has thus far rejected their petition. Was Kessler in charge when that happened, and did he have a hand in denying the petition? Has he only just now seen the light? It would be fabulous to have him weigh in to the Obama administration, to get the ball rolling so that we CAN have labeling of added sugars.

All of that said, I find it odd that Kessler admits to his readers that it's OK to feel angry that they are surrounded by so many hyperpalatable foods and cues to make them overeat - yet he barely mentions a role for the government beyond labeling. Given that he's identified how humans are conditioned to overeat, I would think that a first step would be to make sure that our school lunch programs are not playing a role in conditioning children to overeat.

I don't think it would be wise or right to take away the freedom of individuals to eat what they want, nor the right of businesses to make money, but that right should end at the point where businesses are preying upon consumers. It's the same story we've seen in other areas of business, with initiatives in the Congress to curb predatory lending practices and to establish a public health insurance option that the private companies will have to compete with to limit their abuses as well. Predatory practices by food companies should also be examined by the government, and I'd love to see Kessler use the research in his book to make a case for it.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'll add something to the eating rules (4.00 / 2)
If I know that, for instance, I can't resist the whole tub of coconut ice cream, I'll budget my calories so that if I decide to have the ice cream and eat all of the tub, that's what I get for those calories. It's not, the ice cream and the other stuff, it's the ice cream or the other stuff.

That's where I think the labeling comes in handy. If you can look as see how many calories, how much saturated far, how much added sugar in addition to the total ammount of sugar there is, etc. then you can make an informed choice.

Regarding locavores as elitists - explain to me how supporting local business is elitist....


I go out for 3 oz containers of sorbet (4.00 / 1)
and it's more expensive that way but I have to get off my butt and go to Whole Foods every time i want 3 oz, which is better than having a pint handy in the freezer.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
What is the point (0.00 / 0)
of distinguishing between total sugar and added sugar??? If anyone who reads nutrition labels is not chastened by horrendous levels of total sugar, why would she modify her behavior if the label says Coke contains sugar that is 100% added?

Please explain the practical value of the idea. I see the moralistic attraction.


[ Parent ]
for stuff like yogurt and fruit juice (4.00 / 1)
where there is both natural and added sugars in the product.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
I apologize for my lack of clarity, but (0.00 / 0)
I can't think of a way to ask my question more clearly. What you wrote is obvious, but it doesn't answer my question.

[ Parent ]
Example (0.00 / 0)
Perhaps your effort to answer my question will be assisted by an example. My "if" numbers below are arbitrary.

From my fridge, I read that one cup of America's Choice all natural plain fat free yogurt gives us 130 calories and contains 18 grams total carb, 16 grams sugar.

Now, Netzer says 1 cup of Colombo nonfat strawberry yogurt gives us 190 calories and 39 grams of total carbohydrate. I don't know how much total sugar, say it is 37 grams total sugar. Certain behavior patterns ensue with that information available.

How would behavior, or buying decisions, change if the label said 37 grams total sugar, 21 grams added sugar? That's my question.


[ Parent ]
Why the difference between natural and added is important (0.00 / 0)
as explained by smallbites' Andy Bellatti

"One of my biggest grips about food labels is that they do not differentiate between naturally-occurring sugars and added sugars.

Naturally-occurring sugars are found in fruits and vegetables (in the form of fructose) as well as dairy (as lactose).

Added sugars (mostly in the form of sucrose) are added on to foods during processing.

Although naturally-occurring and added sugars offer the same number of calories (4 per gram), naturally-occurring sugars are different in the sense they "come with the package."

When you bite into an apple, you are getting sugars along with vitamins, minerals, and a wide variety of health-promoting phytonutrients (some of which we have yet to discover!).

If you eat the same amount of sugar naturally found in an apple in the form of table sugar, you are getting empty calories (they are void of vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients.)"


[ Parent ]
Again, the difference between natural and added (0.00 / 0)
is obvious. Again, reiterating the obvious doesn't answer my question. Everybody knows that strawberry yogurt containing only added strawberries would have fewer calories than strawberry yogurt containing strawberry jam with sucrose. Whether the sugar is natural or added, a buyer should think twice about purchasing a serving of yogurt that contains 37 grams of sugar, whether the sugar is added or natural. If the consumer already knows that the serving contains 37 grams of total sugar, how will the buying decision be improved with the additional information that 21 grams of the sugar is added?

[ Parent ]
Thinking about my own example and (0.00 / 0)
ostaff1's response to it, I infer that the thinking is, some buyers who otherwise would buy a 37-gram sugar serving would not buy it if they knew 21 grams of the sugar was added.

Color me extremely sceptical. Of all the things food activists could wish for and work for, this must be the least useful.


[ Parent ]
FYI.... (0.00 / 0)
Howlett et al. Coming to a Restaurant Near You? Potential Consumer Responses to Nutrition Information Disclosure on Menus. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009; 090325111256050 DOI: 10.1086/598799

   The researchers found that providing nutritional information can influence subsequent food consumption, especially when consumers' expectations are not fulfilled when they examine the information.

"The study shows that nutritional information can help consumers moderate their eating over time. In one study, participants ate a sandwich that they later found was unexpectedly high in calories. After this discovery, the participants consumed fewer snacks throughout the rest of the day."

Wilcox et al. Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009; 090409080957062 DOI: 10.1086/599219

   In a series of four studies, the researchers examined how consumers' food choices differed when a healthy item was included in a set compared to when it was not available. The study results showed that the mere presence of a healthy item vicariously fulfills health-related eating goals, drives attention to the least-healthy choice, and provides people with license to indulge in tempting foods. They also demonstrated that these effects were more pronounced in people with relatively high levels of self-control.

Aner Sela, Jonah Berger, and Wendy Liu. Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, April 2009 DOI: 10.1086/593692

   According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, people who choose from a large variety of menu items are more likely to make healthy choices than people who choose from shorter lists.


[ Parent ]
Irrelevant. (0.00 / 0)
In my example, the consumer already knows exactly how many calories are in the serving, and the total sugar. With existing labeling, a consumer concerned about 37 grams of total sugar might look for an alternative with artificial sweetener. Her behavior now is exactly the same as it would be with new labels that show 21 grams added sugar.

The only new outcome I would expect from a label change is a proliferation of artificially sweetened products with large banner logos or text, blaring "No Sugar Added." Such products are on the market already.


[ Parent ]
The chains have just started being required. . . (4.00 / 2)
. . . to supply calorie counts on their menus here in Seattle. It's been an eye-opener to me (on those few occasions when I find myself at such a place).

I almost want to make a fact-finding mission to a Claim Jumper (ugh!), just to see whether my suspicions are correct. I've always thought that one entrée there was more food than I would need in an entire day (or two), but without the numbers, I couldn't prove it.

I recently got suckered into visiting Red Robin, and their highest calorie count item is their "Towering Onion Rings" appetizer with 1900+ calories, which admittedly is supposed to be shared. But since their basic order of fries contains 460 calories, anyone trying to eat less than 1/2 their daily allowance of food at dinner is really at the wrong place!  


you're in Seattle? (4.00 / 1)
I was just there and didnt get to see you! Darn!

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
I'm glad you reviewed this book... (4.00 / 1)
I found it absolutely fascinating, and confirmed my thoughts about the importance of "real" food, as opposed to "processed" food.  

I, see, however, that you didn't dwell on the addictive nature of processed foods. One memorable bit from the book noted that Ensure is quite nearly as addictive as cocaine!  Eating these foods is not just a habit.  

My quick summary of this was as follows:

  • [Combining] sugar, fat, and salt makes foods 'hyperpalatable' ...
  • foods high in sugar, fat, and salt permanently alter the biological circuitry of our brains. ...
  • [they] make you want to eat more ...
  • Rewarding foods are rewiring our brains. As they do, we become more sensitive to the cures that lead us to anticipate rewarding foods. In that self-perpetuating circularity lies a trap...
  • A cue triggers a dopamine-fueled urge ... dopamine motivates our behavior
  • dopamine leads to food ...
  • eating food leads to opioid release ...  
  • opioids produced by eating high-sugar, high-fat foods can relieve pain or stress and calm us down. At least in the short run, they make us feel better ... feel less pain ...  
  • 'supernormal stimuli' [hyperpalatable foods not found in nature] are inherently desirable ...
  • the production of both dopamine and opioids stimulates further eating ...  
  • foods that are high in sugar and fat are as addictive as cocaine...
  • Cues in the environment become the triggers of predictable and automatic actions.  
  • Quantity, concentration of rewarding ingredients, and variety all condition the behavior of vulnerable people...
  • When it comes to food, we are, in essence, following an eating script that has been written into the circuits of our brains.
  • [there are] parallels between hyperpalatable foods and drugs of abuse and ... links among sensory stimulation, cues, and memory ...

And yes, knowing about added sugar is important:

Howlett et al. Coming to a Restaurant Near You? Potential Consumer Responses to Nutrition Information Disclosure on Menus. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009; 090325111256050 DOI: 10.1086/598799

The researchers found that providing nutritional information can influence subsequent food consumption, especially when consumers' expectations are not fulfilled when they examine the information.

"The study shows that nutritional information can help consumers moderate their eating over time. In one study, participants ate a sandwich that they later found was unexpectedly high in calories. After this discovery, the participants consumed fewer snacks throughout the rest of the day."

Wilcox et al. Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009; 090409080957062 DOI: 10.1086/599219

In a series of four studies, the researchers examined how consumers' food choices differed when a healthy item was included in a set compared to when it was not available. The study results showed that the mere presence of a healthy item vicariously fulfills health-related eating goals, drives attention to the least-healthy choice, and provides people with license to indulge in tempting foods. They also demonstrated that these effects were more pronounced in people with relatively high levels of self-control.

Aner Sela, Jonah Berger, and Wendy Liu. Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, April 2009 DOI: 10.1086/593692

According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, people who choose from a large variety of menu items are more likely to make healthy choices than people who choose from shorter lists.


my triggers for over eating have changed (4.00 / 1)
eating mostly vegan. I don't crave the sugar..Last night at Rosh Hashanah dinner I had the first sugar desert in months,,
My sugar cravings are gone.

hard and fast rules don't work for me (4.00 / 1)
I could never adopt a "no dessert" policy. That would seem impossible. However, getting educated about how many calories (roughly) are in different kinds of desserts helps me moderate.

Likewise with french fries. I have probably eaten them about four times in the past year. I wouldn't want to tell myself, "You can never eat french fries again." But if I make french fries one of those extreme treats that I can't have often--not even once a month--it is easier for me not to order them when I go to the restaurant with the best french fries in town.

I used to eat way too many late-night snacks. Now I don't absolutely rule out eating after, say, 8 pm, but before I get a snack I ask myself if I really am hungry or just bored/restless. Maybe once every three or four weeks I really am hungry for a snack at night, so I eat one.

I totally agree with "don't buy it/bring it in the house" as a general rule. That's why I don't keep things like potato chips around.


I've done the same thing (4.00 / 1)
for instance, I have my favorite fast foods which I set aside as treats. Sausage McMuffin with egg I used to get one of those with a hashbrown fairly regarly. Now I get one maybe once every month or two and without the taters. Knowing the calorie count lets me adjust the rest of the day's meals accordingly. I'm a conneseur of gas station fast food and the Lone Elder gas station has a spicy beef burrito that I really like. Every once in a while as I drive out that direction I treat myself to a couple of those, they're a lot smaller than the regular sized burritos you find at the gas station.

Also, since Harold was diagnosed with diabetes several years ago, I've had to adjust how I cook for us pretty drastically, and I've become much more aware of sugars, carbohydrates, etc.

Once you really start thinking about what you're eating, I think it's a lot easier to mitigate any of the issues that the book points out with becoming habituated to things like sugars, fats, salt, etc..

Regarding locavores as elitists - explain to me how supporting local business is elitist....


[ Parent ]
I grew up with 'dessert' being a treat. (4.00 / 1)
 We only had it about once a week, usually ice-cream and other desserts like pie and fruit crisps with special dinners. I never considered it part of normal meal. I love desserts though and would always pig out whenever they happened to occur. When I was living on my own I never had sweets in the house besides a tub of ice-cream that was barely touched.  So in comes my food issue. My husband is a dessert guy. He loves to finish meal with something sweet and it doesn't seem to affect him that much.  When we got married I started to buy and make desserts way more often and the habit of pigging out 'cause it's treat' became a more regular occurence. Ugh. I gained some weight before I clued in to what was going on.

It's taken a bit for me to make a truce with 'desserts'. I can't have a no sweet policy either, well I could but it would be really stressful so we've come to some compromise. When it comes to 'dessert' he buys what he wants (even though I could make them) and to help lessen the temptation for me gets things I don't really like. Luckily he loves things I don't. So we have date squares and macaroons in the house rather then chocolate brownies. Cookies make rare appearances. Banana cream pie instead of pecan. (gawd I could eat a whole pecan pie if it was in front of me :D )

It is tough for sometimes but it's a good compromise. My biggest issue right now is everytime he eats a premade 'dessert' I get a little stressed because I feel we SHOULD be making them all from scratch at home. I just don't dare though. Maybe in the future but not now.  It's one of my only compromises in having more processed foodstuffs in the house.  


[ Parent ]
I don't bake, other than bread for me or cornbread ocasionally (4.00 / 1)
for the same reasons. Harold doesn't like the the bread I make very often, so I don't have to worry about him eating too much as it runs his blood sugar up. I don't bake deserts or other sweet goodies except for Thanksgiving and Christmas, then I give most of it away. I don't need the calories and Harold doesn't need the sugars and carbs. So we get a few treats each year. Harold does buy cookies every once in a while, but only a few times a year, at least that I know about.

It helps that neither of us has a strong sweet tooth.

Now, ya put salty stuff or anything with lots of vinegar in it, and I'm a gonner, which is why I have lots of vinegar in the house but usually no chips.

Regarding locavores as elitists - explain to me how supporting local business is elitist....


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox