Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Book Review: This Is Your Country On Drugs

by: Jill Richardson

Mon Jul 27, 2009 at 09:25:43 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
My experience with our country's drug policy (and I expect yours too) is like the story of the blind men touching the elephant. Each man touched a different part of the elephant, and when asked to describe it, one described the elephant's side, one described its tail, others described its ears or its trunk, but none of them were able to understand or describe the entire elephant. Ryan Grim's new book This Is Your Country on Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America is the tool you need to understand the entire elephant of America's drug history and its drug policy.
Jill Richardson :: Book Review: This Is Your Country On Drugs
I grew up in the generation that saw the "This is Your Brain on Drugs" TV commercials and heard "Just Say No." We were among the first kids to go through the D.A.R.E. program. Now, as adults, some of the kids from my school are in a successful marijuana-loving band, and they wear D.A.R.E. T-shirts when they perform their concerts around the country. And yet, until college, I didn't actually know (or knew that I knew) anyone who DID drugs.

As an adult, I've come to find out that we were basically lied to about marijuana, although I'm not a fan of it myself. The "gateway drug" theory is bullshit, and even if it were true, why should two so-called gateway drugs (alcohol and tobacco) be legal, taxed, and regulated, when pot is criminalized? And why is medical marijuana so off-limits when prescription narcotics and other addictive and pleasurable prescriptions (like Xanax, for example) so easy to get?

America's drug policy had an even greater (and more tragic) effect on my life this year. The person most dear to me in my entire life was arrested and thrown out of college for about 2 ounces of pot his freshman year. And yet, a few years later, he was able to legally get enough Klonopin through a prescription to abuse it for nearly a year and ultimately kill himself. Pot would have never killed him, yet pot was illegal and even criminal.

For that matter, I've known two people - good people, not criminals - who spent time in jail for so-called marijuana crimes. One was jailed because he found some ditchweed - wild growing cannabis that can't even really get you high - and picked a bunch of it out of curiosity. The other because she dated a pot dealer but didn't do anything herself. What. The. Fuck.

So those are all of the different parts of the elephant of our drug policy that have touched me during my life. Grim's book was fascinating as it provided a historical perspective going back to the founding of our nation and then explained our more recent history, shedding light on my own personal experiences (and probably yours too).

What stands out to the reader probably the most is how one drug (or geographic area that produces a drug) rises when the government cracks down on another one. Suppress pot, and cocaine becomes the new big thing. Take away American availability to the precursors of meth and the Mexicans make it for us. Outlaw all alcohol and people get high instead of drunk. And the big winner in all of this seems to be the Mexican drug cartels, for every time Columbian, American, or Caribbean drug production or importation is curtailed or suppressed, the Mexicans step up their production and diversify their drug industry.

Another tragic but obvious revelation in the book is the influence of Big Pharma and to a lesser extent the alcohol and tobacco industries. They want us all to get drunk, high, and addicted, but they want a monopoly on our business. The big loser here is, of course, pot, because it grows like a weed so nobody can patent it, control production, and get rich by it. Since drug use is more or less a zero sum game, if pot smoking went up then consumption of tobacco, booze, and pharmaceuticals would go down. None of those industries want that, so pot remains illegal.

The third major theme that sticks out to me is our government's lack of concern over the effectiveness of drug policy. They will go full steam ahead with D.A.R.E., law enforcement, and drug testing despite evidence that they don't work (or evidence that other methods will work better and cheaper). No doubt the prison, defense contracting, and drug testing industries are enjoying this immensely. I understand that drug policy comes second to economic policy (i.e. passing NAFTA despite its known effects on the drug trade), but why are we so married to policies that do not work? Expensive and harmful policies that put many Americans in jail, some for life, needlessly. It seems its largely political posturing and rigid ideology, not to mention the right trying to crush the hippie counterculture movement by taking away their mind-expanding drugs of choice.

The long story short, which comes as a surprise to no one, is that our country has one hell of a screwed up relationship with drugs, and it's not about to change that any time soon. This is a very tragic stain on American history, as it results in the unnecessary jailing and even death of our own citizens, for nothing.

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
its truly the elephant in the room (4.00 / 3)
that no one wants to touch. Especially our risk adverse politicians.

Do polls show the majority of Americans think pot should be decriminalized or legal?


maryjane, with polling (4.00 / 1)
From Time Magazine

Is Marijuana the Answer to California's Budget Woes?

While 13 states permit the limited sale of marijuana for medical use, and polls show a steady increase in the number of Americans who favor legalization, federal law still bans the cultivation, sale or possession of marijuana. In fact, the feds still classify marijuana as a Schedule I drug, one that has no "currently accepted medical use" in the U.S.

But supporters of legalization may have been handed their most convincing factor yet: the bummer economy. Advocates say that if state or local governments could collect a tax on even a fraction of pot sales, it would help rescue cash-strapped communities. Not surprisingly, the idea is getting traction in California, home to the nation's largest supply of domestically grown marijuana (worth an estimated $14 billion a year) and biggest state budget deficit (more than $26 billion).

On July 20, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and California legislative leaders reached a tentative budget agreement to plug the state's deficit, but it would involve making sweeping cuts in education and health services as well as taking billions from county governments. Democratic state assemblyman Tom Ammiano has introduced legislation that would let California regulate and tax the sale of marijuana. The state's proposed $50-per-oz. pot tax would bring in about $1.3 billion a year in additional revenue. Ammiano's bill was shelved this session, but he expects to introduce a revised bill early next year.

no "currently accepted medical use"?

Well, anyway, I'm no expert, but the proposal seems underwhelming as it stands. A tax of $50/oz? Does that make sense? A modified, more realistic version could make sense, though.

marijuana polling


[ Parent ]
Off-Topic (4.00 / 2)
Real food not good enough for you?  Nanotechnology to the rescue!

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/20...


can't patent it (4.00 / 1)
Science News reported on a large Danish study of hormone replacement therapy.

Postmenopausal hormones up cancer risk

A report in the July 15 Journal of the American Medical Association now weighs in fairly conclusively on one aspect of the risk equation. It finds that "Regardless of the duration of use, the formulation, estrogen dose, regimen, progestin type, and route of administration, hormone therapy was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer."
...

But the new data focus only on ovarian malignancies. In fact, many women fill prescriptions for hormones to garner benefits that go well beyond providing mere comfort. For instance, a dozen years ago, we reported on a New England Journal of Medicine study following 121,700 nurses. Among those who had been at highest risk of heart disease, the treatment reduced their incidence of premature death from cardiovascular disease by 50 percent. That was five times the reduction calculated among estrogen users without heart risks.

I can't read the full text of the July 15 JAMA article, Hormone Therapy and Ovarian Cancer. By inference from the abstract, though, the study was yet another one involving Premarin estrogen and progestin sythetic analogs of progesterone. To date, I know of no large HRT study using natural hormones.

I mention this here for two reasons. The first is the "can't patent it" factor. The guy who discovered the availability of natural estrogens from plants put the discovery in the public domain, didn't patent it. He thought he did a good thing. The result was that, because nobody could have a fortune-making monopoly on a public domain product, Big Pharma found a more profitable way to rape women. (erm, too strong? maybe so. I digress...) Natural hormones aren't studied because their use is so miniscule that an organization would find it difficult to identify the large well-documented population needed to do a credible epidemiological study.

Would natural hormones yield better outcomes than the synthetics that have made the drug moguls untold fortunes? I don't know. Nobody knows. The second reason for mentioning this is, simply, this ticks me off something fierce. I'm a man, so I've not faced the very personal struggle about deciding how or whether to use HRT. If I were a woman, I think I'd want some heads to be displayed on pikes in the village square.


This is your nation on drugs (4.00 / 3)
Congratulations, Jill, for pointing out the significant and ludicrous flaw behind marijuana legislation!
I can only assume it exists because someone, at some level, is making beaucoup bucks out of its illegitimacy. My guess would be politicians or police, and my take is that they, as usual, would rather help themselves than their fellow Americans.  

there's that, but they are also cowards (4.00 / 3)
they are afraid of losing their jobs and prefer to be non-controversial instead of risking losing re-election.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox