About
La Vida Locavore is the blog for anyone whose crazy life includes planting, growing, weeding, fertilizing, raising, picking, harvesting, processing, cooking, baking, making, serving, buying, selling, distributing, transporting, composting, organizing around, lobbying about, writing about, thinking about, talking about, playing with, and eating food!

Our ActBlue Page


Notable Diaries
- Recent Congressional Hearings
- 2008 By The Numbers
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Why I Oppose GMOs
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Politicians To Know
USDA

Senate

Agriculture
Chair: Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)
- Max Baucus (D-MT)
- Michael Bennet (D-CO)
- Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
- Bob Casey (D-PA)
- Kent Conrad (D-ND)
- Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
- Tom Harkin (D-IA)
- Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
- Pat Leahy (D-VT)
- Ben Nelson (D-NE)
- Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
- Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
- Thad Cochran (R-MS)
- John Cornyn (R-TX)
- Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
- Mike Johanns (R-NE)
- Dick Lugar (R-IN)
- Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
- Pat Roberts (R-KS)
- John R. Thune (R-SD)

Appropriations
Chair: Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Ag Sub-Committee
Chair: Herb Kohl (D-WI)
- Byron Dorgan (D-ND)
- Dick Durbin (D-IL)
- Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
- Tom Harkin (D-IA)
- Tim Johnson (D-SD)
- Ben Nelson (D-NE)
- Jack Reed (D-RI)
- Robert Bennett (R-UT)
- Christopher Bond (R-MO)
- Sam Brownback (R-KS)
- Thad Cochran (R-MS)
- Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
- Arlen Specter (R-PA)

Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions
- Chris Dodd (D-CT)

Senate Hunger Caucus

House

Agriculture
Chair: B Collin Peterson (D-MN)
V. Chair: B Tim Holden (D-PA)
B Joe Baca (D-CA)
- John Boccieri (D-OH)
B* Leonard Boswell (D-IA)
- Bobby Bright (D-AL)
B* Dennis Cardoza (D-CA)
- Travis Childers (D-MS)
B Jim Costa (D-CA)
- Henry Cuellar (D-TX)
- Kathy Dahlkemper (D-PA)
B Brad Ellsworth (D-IN)
- Debbie Halvorson (D-IL)
B Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-SD)
- Steve Kagen (D-WI)
- Larry Kissell (D-NC)
B Frank Kratovil (D-MD)
- Betsy Markey (D-CO)
B Jim Marshall (D-GA)
P Eric Massa (D-NY)
B Mike McIntyre (D-NC)
- Walt Minnick (D-ID)
B Earl Pomeroy (D-ND)
- Mark Schauer (D-MI)
- Kurt Schrader (D-OR)
B David Scott (D-GA)
B Zachary Space (D-OH)
- Timothy Walz (D-MN)
- Frank Lucas (R-OK)
- Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
- K. Michael Conaway (R-TX)
- Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE)
- Virginia Foxx (R-NC)
- Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)
- Sam Graves (R-MO)
- Timothy Johnson (R-IL)
- Steve King (R-IA)
- Robert Latta (R-OH)
- Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO)
- Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
- Jerry Moran (R-KS)
- Randy Neugebauer (R-TX)
- Phil Roe (R-TN)
- Mike Rogers (R-AL)
- Jean Schmidt (R-OH)
- Adrian Smith (R-NE)
- Glenn Thompson (R-PA)
*=House Organic Caucus member
B=Blue Dog Democrat

Appropriations
Chair: Dave Obey (D-WI)
Ag Sub-Committee
Chair: P Rosa DeLauro (D-CT)
- Sanford Bishop (D-GA)
* Allen Boyd (D-FL)
- Lincoln Davis (D-TN)
*P Sam Farr (D-CA)
*P Maurice D. Hinchey (D-NY)
P Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)
P Marcy Kaptur (D-OH)
- Jack Kingston (R-GA)
- Rodney Alexander (R-LA)
- Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO)
* Tom Latham (R-IA)
*=House Organic Caucus member

P=Congressional Progressive Caucus

Education and Labor
P Chair: George Miller (D-CA)
- Jason Altmire (D-PA)
- Robert Andrews (D-NJ)
- Timothy Bishop (D-NY)
P Yvette Clarke (D-NY)
- Joe Courtney (D-CT)
- Susan Davis (D-CA)
P Marcia Fudge (D-OH)
P Raul Grijalva (D-AZ)
P Phil Hare (D-IL)
- Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX)
P Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
- Rush Holt (D-NJ)
- Dale Kildee (D-MI)
P Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
P Dave Loebsack (D-IA)
- Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY)
P Donald Payne (D-NJ)
- Jared Polis (D-CO)
- Robert Scott (D-VA)
- Joe Sestak (D-PA)
- Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH)
P John Tierney (D-MA)
- Dina Titus (D-NV)
- Paul Tonko (D-NY)
P Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)
- David Wu (D-OR)
- Buck McKeon (R-CA)
- Judy Biggert (R-IL)
- Rob Bishop (R-UT)
- Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
- Michael Castle (R-DE)
- Vernon Ehlers (R-MI)
- Luis F Fortuno (R-PR)
- Brett Guthrie (R-KY)
- Peter Hoekstra (R-MI)
- Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA)
- John Kline (R-MN)
- Kenny Marchant (R-TX)
- Tom McClintock (R-CA)
- Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA)
- Thomas Petri (R-WI)
- Phil Roe (R-TN)
- Todd Russell Platts (R-PA)
- Tom Price (R-GA)
- Mark Souder (R-IN)
- GT Thompson (R-PA)
- Joe Wilson (R-SC)
P=Congressional Progressive Caucus

House Organic Caucus
Congressional Progressive Caucus

La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Hillary Clinton Talks About Food

by: Jill Richardson

Mon Jun 15, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM PDT


"What does the State Department have to do with food?" a friend asked me yesterday, when I told him about Hillary Clinton's recent involvement with food issues. The State Department is the home of USAID - the U.S. Agency for International Development - and they are the ones charged with doling out food aid around the world. Thus, Secretary Clinton deals with food issues.  The past year or two has been marked by food riots and major food shortages around the developing world. Numbers are thrown around about 800 million or even a billion hungry people in the world, mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (i.e. India and neighboring countries). Hillary recently weighed in on world hunger over on Huffington Post. While fighting hunger is a noble cause and hardly controversial, Clinton outlined seven guiding principles and I take issue with some of them:  
1.  We will seek to increase agricultural productivity, by expanding access to quality seeds, fertilizers, irrigation tools, and the credit to purchase them and training to use them.
 

5. We will seek to increase trade so small-scale farmers can sell their crops far and wide.
Jill Richardson :: Hillary Clinton Talks About Food
Hillary's words are informed by the wrongheaded notions that hunger is a yield problem and that biotech and other Green Revolution technologies are the way to increase yield. She is further promoting the ideology of free trade, but from everything I've heard, the key to fighting hunger is food sovereignty - helping each country and region of the world feed itself. Poor nations become vulnerable to the whims of the global market if they grow cash crops like vanilla and coffee for the west instead of growing food for themselves. When you focus on feeding yourself instead of the world market, in the worst case scenario (if prices crash) you can eat your crop.

Clinton's science advisor, Nina Federoff, came out the other day with a ridiculous pro-biotech statement that we don't ask doctors to use 19th century medicine and therefore we shouldn't tell farmers to do 19th century farming. This is a repetition of the silly idea that organic farming has not advanced in the last century. Obviously that's absurd (although I will say that if we had invested more in organic research, no doubt organics would be ahead of where they are today - but that's our fault, not the fault of organic farming!).  The Union of Concerned Scientists posted a rebuttal to Federoff (and, thus, Clinton) this week, saying:

Organic and similar methods rely on a sophisticated scientific understanding of how a farm operates within an ecosystem—indeed, how the farm itself is an ecosystem of interconnected plants, insects, and other animals. Organic farming systems incorporate techniques like long crop rotations to control pests and leguminous cover crops or manure to add nutrients and build soil. A recent summary of studies on farming systems around the world found that such systems are often nearly as productive as current industrial agriculture in developed countries, but importantly, much more so in developing countries. The study demonstrates that the green and animal manures employed in organic agriculture can produce enough fixed nitrogen to support high crop yields. Where additional synthetic inputs are needed, other low-external-input methods are producing high yields with much reduced environmental impact. These highly productive methods are needed to produce enough food without converting uncultivated land—such as forests that are important for biodiversity and slowing climate change—into crop fields. They build deep, rich soils that hold water, sequester carbon, and resist erosion. And they don’t poison the air, drinking water, and fisheries with excess fertilizers and toxic pesticides.

The Green Revolution "high yield" technologies should be referred to as "high input." You put a lot of things in - things that will run out some day like oil (and petroleum products like fertilizer), fertile topsoil, and water - and you produce a lot of food. But that only works until you run out of those inputs and then the game is up. Sustainable farming doesn't come with an end date when it won't be possible anymore. If we are going to truly help feed the world - not just this year but in all of the years to come - then that's what we need to focus on.

The UCS piece continues, rebutting Federoff (and, thus, Clinton) by saying:

Federoff's view is at odds with the latest science, and represents a status quo kind of thinking. Today's dominant industrial U.S. agriculture relies on huge monocultures of a few major crops like corn and soybeans, and requires large inputs of fossil-fuel based synthetic chemicals to control pests and fertilize the crops. Such an agriculture churns out a lot of commodity crops (most of which are turned into meat and processed foods) while also contributing greatly to air and water pollution. Industrial agriculture is a major contributor of heat-trapping emissions and a major cause of so-called dead zones such as that in the Gulf of Mexico. And industrial agriculture is ultimately its own worst enemy, as it causes massive degradation of the very soil that is vital to farming itself. This kind of agriculture is unsustainable. We will need to move away from it towards the biologically-informed approaches that can both keep yields high while reducing environmental harm.

Although many critics see genetic engineering as a major factor in this debate, it is in fact only a minor appendage onto the industrial agriculture system-one that has done little to either increase its productivity or mitigate its environmental harm. Leaders who rely on industrial agriculture systems-with or without genetic engineering-are the ones truly stuck in the past.  The challenges of the 21st century demand a fundamental rethink of agriculture that takes environmental harm into account. Promising methods and technologies like organic are in the vanguard of that effort. We cannot afford to move toward the future without such technologies.

So, Hillary, do what you can to help the world's hungry, but please, actually HELP them. Don't just deliver them up as a new market to American corporations that are peddling unsustainable technologies that will ultimately leave the world's hungry no better off than they are today.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
root cause of hunger is population (4.00 / 3)
Once, just once, I'd like to see a representative of the US government acknowledge the root cause of hunger. The root cause is too many humans. We all know it. Yet no one will talk about it.

Hillary may be right about the short term cure. But she doesn't appear to have the courage it takes to tackle the long term cure. And that means talking about, and doing something about, population control.

Population control is the key to so many of our current problems, from hunger to global warming, to fresh water shortages, to air and water pollution, to overfishing the seas, to deforestation, to endless resource wars, to plant and animal extinctions, etc., etc., etc. Once we finally start to address the issue it will take generations for the effects to be felt.

We, all 200 or so nations of this planet, must summon up the courage to follow the Chinese lead and work to reduce our current populations. Either we do it voluntarily or Nature will do it involuntarily.

Yet we can't even summon the courage to talk about it. Sigh... I'm afraid there's going to be a lot more hungry people on Planet Earth before this is all over.


See also: Malthus (4.00 / 2)
Malthusian catastrophe

I think I may fairly make two postulata. First, That food is necessary to the existence of man. Secondly, That the passion between the sexes is necessary and will remain nearly in its present state. These two laws, ever since we have had any knowledge of mankind, appear to have been fixed laws of our nature, and, as we have not hitherto seen any alteration in them, we have no right to conclude that they will ever cease to be what they now are, without an immediate act of power in that Being who first arranged the system of the universe, and for the advantage of his creatures, still executes, according to fixed laws, all its various operations.
...
Assuming then my postulata as granted, I say, that the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man. Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio.

- Malthus 1798, Chapter 1



Yankee Frugality: use it up, wear it out, make it last, or do without.

[ Parent ]
I disagree (4.00 / 3)
even when we had less people on earth (by a lot) we still had hunger. And we grow enough food for everybody. The root cause is our unwillingness to share the food with those who can't pay for it.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Population control (4.00 / 3)
should be a part of the debate in environmental circles. Especially when it comes to water debate, we are going to get to the point where we just don't have enough clean fresh water.

But I don't agree this is the root of our current hunger problems. Groceries stores are overflowing with product and people's pantries are empty. Grain stores are going down because we're making fuel out of it. I think there's plenty of food to feed the world just not enough political will.

In some ways this is also cultural. There's also a notion that everyone needs to go to college, implying that a cubicle is a better lifestyle than working a farm. When I was a middle schooler I remember that the World was just going to explode if I didn't get into a 'good college'. I didn't and the world is just fine.

At least in this country I feel like we're pushed too hard to do something, when a simple life may be far more enjoyable than a fruitless journey to be the best paper shuffler or writer of fine print. It might sound silly to wish for a more agrarian lifestyle, but I think it's silly that millions' have careers in selling cokes and candy bars.


[ Parent ]
Her complete remarks (4.00 / 3)
which she pulled the HP post from:

http://www.state.gov/secretary...


Thanks! (4.00 / 2)
will def check it out!!!!

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
OK.I read the speech (4.00 / 2)
And, Jill's argument about food not reaching poor people notwithstanding, the missing "8th item",
curbing population growth to meet realistic food production capabilities
still stands out.

World Population Growth

Source: US Department of Commerce, plus other research
There are many estimates of population for various time periods.
The reporting categories change over time, introducing difficult-to-resolve errors.
I have selected the numbers which are the most consistent among experts in the demographics field.

There have been tremendous accomplishments in agriculture in the last two centuries since Malthus first put forward his theory. There has been an equally startling rise in population to match the advances. The world population that had reached 900 million in 1800 now stands at 6.5 billion.

In the last 50 years alone, since the advent of The Green Revolution, the population has more than doubled - (1960=2.973 billion).

A recent article in the National Geographic Magazine and numerous diaries here and elsewhere all state that GMO isn't turning out to be a solution, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is no significant gains in yield.

Shortage of arable land. Increasing unavailability of water. Larger and larger fossil fuel requirements. More deforestation. More acidification of oceans.

And the population is projected to increase by 50% in a generation.

Disclosure: I practice what I preach. I have no children. I made that choice forty years ago. My brother has no children. My cousins have no children. My friends mostly have no children.

I don't advocate draconian population control by starvation. But without education to improve the lives extent and education to reduce our unrestrained growth, we're simply pissing on a forest fire.

Yankee Frugality: use it up, wear it out, make it last, or do without.


[ Parent ]
ha! comment about this on Facebook: (4.00 / 3)
I believe that's called "triangulating." Or maybe it's "selling out." I forget...

(regarding why Hillary's remarks sound so similar to Monsanto's talking points.)

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman


Heh... (4.00 / 3)
It's 1995-6 all over again, huh?

"Intelligent discontent is the mainspring of civilization." - Eugene V. Debs

[ Parent ]
I wouldn't be so sure (4.00 / 3)
she was quite involved with the farmer's here while our Senator. Even held an anuual Farm Day in DC to show off our agriculture.

http://www.freshplaza.com/news...

"Senator Clinton has become a true missionary for New York agriculture, including the grape and wine industry," said Jim Trezise, President of the statewide New York Wine & Grape Foundation, which organizes the event. "This food and wine showcase is designed to facilitate her strong advocacy of New York agriculture by tastefully showing her colleagues that New York has some of the best foods, wines, and restaurants in the world."

In the past five years, New York Farm Day has become one of the most popular events on Capitol Hill. As the current edition of US News put it, "It's that time of year again when lawmakers and top Hill aides eagerly await their invitation to what most call the best industry reception of the year: New York Farm Day, hosted by Sen. Hillary Clinton." As a reminder of this year's Farm Day feast, this week all U.S. Senators and New York Representatives will receive a bottle of premium New York wine with a personal note.



[ Parent ]
One step forward, and... (4.00 / 1)
That's great, and I've always liked Hillary much more than her husband...

But!

Now she's no longer representing just New York, so it bears watching.  Clintons in DC don't have that great a history when it comes to supporting sustainable agriculture, to say the least...

"Intelligent discontent is the mainspring of civilization." - Eugene V. Debs


[ Parent ]
But she did have 7 yrs here. (4.00 / 3)
She was actually pretty involved upstate with Ag. She also authored a bill to reduce a certain antibiotic use at factory farms etc. She scored high on the humane scale when it came to farming/farm animals etc. I would expect her to take that knowledge with her.

I actually googled around to see what kind of seed the Dr receiving the award had created, and I was prompted to by her continued use of "sustainable". I couldn't find anything that said he was doing anything other than hybrid breeding for climate etc. On one site congratulating him, their resource list contain a majority of seed saving/exchange/heritage seed links.  Positive sign, but you're right, bears watching.

I think she got a fairly raw deal on Big Ag perception. One, folks put Bill's actions on her, as if she did them. And two, there were some misleading and down right untrue things circulated about her (which also included putting Bill's actions on her). many didn't bother to, ya know, follow up on her actual actions. Coming out of Iowa, she had the strongest and most comprehensive food safety plan. And she went as far as to include in writing pet food and vet meds. She obviously put more time into it and didn't just give glossy statements and vague proposals.

Is she perfect? Nope. But she at least has really looked at the issues and gotten involved. I was surprised when she mentioned 70% of the world's farmers are women. And then noted the the programs and $$$ are aimed at men. I think when she talks about the farmers in these countries being able to sell their goods globally, she's not looking to turn them all in to big Ag free traders, but thinking on a more practical level of selling their goods beyond local demand. Think Fair Trade vs the nasty side of Free Trade.

I've always felt Michelle understood the food issue better than her husband. She was the one that talked to the Drs about her daughter, the one that read the labels and had to do the food change in the home etc. I hope she has enough influence on him, but he did serve in a big Ag state, so I've always been a bit leery. I'm watching both him and Clinton on this matter :) Clinton is not so tied (imo) to big Ag in her current position. She doesn't need to make concessions (triangulate) on bills so much as she can direct things through NGO's etc. It's not like she has to vote for a stimulus that has some nasty amendment attached, or satisfy us pesky voters, lol!~  ;) She also seems very focused and happy as she goes about her work using "smart power", so here's "hoping"  ;)


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Buy an autographed copy of Recipe for America

Autograph to:
LVL Gear
"Too Big to Fail" T-Shirt

(details)
Support La Vida Locavore
Subscribe for $10/month:
One-Time Gift:



Photobucket









Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox