Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Chinese Chicken, Again

by: Jill Richardson

Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 04:56:48 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
A few weeks ago I wrote about a fight in Washington over whether or not the U.S. should allow imports of processed Chinese chicken. Meatpackers said yes, and nearly everyone else said no.

So here's the latest from Meatingplace.com on the matter, written by Former Undersecretary of Agriculture for Food Safety Dr. Richard Raymond:

"Chickety China, the Chinese Chicken. Eat a drum stick, and your brain stops tickin'." Words from "One Week", a song by the Canadian group Bare Naked Ladies. If you have kids in their early thirties, you know of this group.

But Congress must have taken these words literally because they have banned cooked Chinese chicken supposedly so we can keep our brains tickin'. There is nothing about their action that is based on science, so I must assume they will quote these lyrics when responding to the WTO complaint filed by China.

I'm pretty sure he got the lyrics wrong, first of all. I believe it's HAVE a drumstick and your brain stops tickin'. Looks like he checked his facts on that about as well as he checked his facts on the Chinese chicken issue.  

Jill Richardson :: Chinese Chicken, Again
Raymond says that the USDA found chicken from China to be safe. But here's what those opposed to Chinese chicken imports say about that:

The FSIS Equivalency Determination for China was Flawed

In 2004, the PRC had requested that it be allowed to export processed poultry products of domestic Chinese origin to the United States.  After it conducted a document review of the PRC food safety system, FSIS dispatched auditors in December 2004 to visit PRC food safety government offices, laboratories and a sample of poultry plants (three slaughter and four processing facilities) that could be eligible to export to the United States.  The deficiencies that the auditors found included:

1) The PRC's food safety agency, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ), did not exercise control over all of the food processing establishments under its jurisdiction;
2) AQSIQ veterinarians did not consistently enforce FSIS food safety standards;
3) Residue testing methodologies differed from those used by FSIS and in one laboratory, the sampling procedures could lead to cross-contamination;
4) Testing for salmonella was not being consistently performed;
5) Not all documents had been translated into English;
6) Food safety deficiencies were found in five of the seven food establishments visited.

The sanitation issues were so egregious in two of the facilities that FSIS auditors would have recommended that they be delisted or made ineligible to export to the United States.
[emphasis mine]

FSIS auditors returned to the PRC in July 2005 to visit four slaughter facilities.  In all cases, the FSIS auditors found that the PRC had not stationed government veterinarians to perform ante-mortem and post-mortem inspections of poultry.  In one establishment, FSIS not only discovered a deficient Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan, but also encountered serious sanitation issues.  The FSIS auditors remarked that had these four plants been eligible to export to the United States, they would have been delisted for failing to meet critical requirements of U.S. food safety standards. [emphasis mine]

   On November 23, 2005, FSIS proposed a rule that would grant the PRC partial equivalency to export processed poultry products to the U.S. provided that the raw poultry came from either the United States or Canada (70 FR 70746-70749).   The comment period closed on January 23, 2006, and the overwhelming majority of the 34 comments the agency received were in opposition to the proposed regulation.  In fact, the only positive comments came from entrepreneurs from the PRC who stood to benefit from this rule.

   The process that ensued subsequent to the closing of the comment period was astonishing.  The final regulation was transmitted by USDA to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review on April 18, 2006.   OMB cleared the rule after only one day's analysis.  On April 20, 2006, PRC President Hu Jintao visited President George W. Bush at the White House where it was announced that the rule had been finalized.   The final rule was eventually published in the April 24, 2006 Federal Register (71 FR 20867-20871).

   According to an audit report published by the USDA Office of the Inspector General in August 2008, FSIS was prepared to grant the PRC equivalency status for slaughtered poultry.    That determination had not been made public until the release of this particular audit report.  For the PRC to be able to export processed poultry products of domestic Chinese origin would require a new rule.

It should be noted that the PRC never certified any plants to export processed poultry products to the United States under the April 24, 2006 rule. Instead, the PRC government renewed its effort to be able to export processed poultry of domestic Chinese origin.

In December 2006, then-Under Secretary for Food Safety Richard Raymond reportedly pledged to PRC officials that he would begin the regulatory process to amend the equivalency status for the PRC so that it could start exporting processed poultry of domestic Chinese origin to the United States.

This rule never was proposed formally and then the Congress passed a prohibition against the expenditure of any funds to implement regulations that would permit the importation of processed poultry products from the PRC.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
And to all of the above (4.00 / 4)
I'd like to add - ya want a side of melamine with that?

I swear, the Chinese can't even make drywall that doesn't fall apart and/or makes people sick.

Learning what I have about international trade, and equivelancy, I don't buy anything that's processed unless it has the country where the product was manufactured and it's either from the USA or a country I 'trust'. And for meats, chicken, etc. I don't even venture that far. My beef/pork comes from a local producer, and on the rate ocassion I do buy a chicken from the store I buy from our local big producer and that's only because I know someone who grows for them, so I at least have an idea of how the birds are raised. When I get my incubator built this winter, I won't even be buying chicken from the store then. I'll get my own parent stock and breed my own broilers....

Regarding locavores as elitists - explain to me how supporting local business is elitist....


It's truly frightening they would even consider (4.00 / 3)
expanding imports from China with the massive health and safety problems they have. Good Lord, if they are willing to spike baby formula . . . .

My chicken shares start on June 20th. I still have one left in the freezer from last season. I've been saving it. I'll have it this weekend with this season's first CSA share.  


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox