|
Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 14:00:00 PM PDT
|
|
Good on the LA Times for running this op ed! It's about an upcoming vote in California to ban battery cages for chickens in factory farms. As the op ed points out, this will not result in sustainable and humane egg production - just no more cages and a few extra inches of space per bird. They will still reside in enormous barns, filled with the stink of their own excrement. The article questions the environmental impact of such a change, asking if CAFOs complying with the new law (assuming it passes) will use more resources (energy, land) than before. The piece concludes:
But there are small things we can do that might be more meaningful than a cage ban. The eggs I buy come from hens raised free-range on pasture. Their manure fertilizes vegetables on the small farm where they live. And the chickens -- if the deliciousness of their eggs is any indication -- seem content. Do these eggs cost more? Of course, but that seems a small sacrifice given the benefits.
If we want our chickens and other livestock to live in decent conditions, we need a more radical change to our food system than this, or any ballot initiative, can deliver. The problems in industrial agriculture -- and their solutions -- are much bigger than simply banning battery cages.
I plan to vote yes on the measure. It's a small, inadequate start, but it's a start. |
| OrangeClouds115 :: Op Ed on CA's Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure |
|
| Poll |
| How will/would you vote? |
|
|
|
Results
|
|
|