Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Credit Default Swaps To Be Regulated By The Agriculture Committee?

by: Curtis Abbey

Sat May 30, 2009 at 01:08:16 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
Let's start at the beginning, Credit Default Swaps are effectively insurance taken out that pays off if a derivative defaults. The trouble we got into with Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) is that the CDSs were not regulated. The other problem was that people were buying CDSs that didn't own the underlying derivative. This is called a naked CDS which I've heard was about 90% of the total market. Basically this was just gambling, unregulated gambling. Which is rare, because whether it's Vegas, a riverboat, a lottery or online cards, gambling in this country is always regulated and either taxed or made illegal. If it were anyone other than Wall Street betting on these CDSs it would have been shut down or taxed.

What does this have to do with agriculture? The CFTC is one of two regulatory bodies competing for the role of CDS regulator. The CFTC, Commodities Futures Trading Commission is overseen by the House Agriculture Committee.

Curtis Abbey :: Credit Default Swaps To Be Regulated By The Agriculture Committee?
An article was written in the Wall Street Journal Friday that really scared/annoyed me. It was titled Financial Overhaul Raises Questions. Of course we must consider that the WSJ is a Murdoch property, and must be treated with caution. However it fits into a narrative that I've been writing for myself (and scaring myself with) and it seems like a quality article. That narrative is that the Obama administration and the current Congress are going to go for the path of least resistance. That means, if a reform is going to cost jobs or hurt the economy/stock market, they probably won't do it.

WASHINGTON -- Obama administration officials are debating whether to pare some of their more ambitious ideas to revamp oversight of financial markets, in a nod to the political difficulties of pushing through sweeping changes, people familiar with the process say.

At issue is whether officials want to reorganize the basic structure of oversight, or whether they will settle for new rules at existing agencies that would accomplish the same goal.

What does real reform look like? It would be a reversal of the CFMA of 2000 and the Gramm Leach Bliley act. Both of which repealed Depression era regulations which kept banks and investment houses from merging, as well as keeping single stock futures off the market. For our purposes lets focus on the CFMA, since I have no clue how you split up these too big to fail investo-banks that George Bush's Treasury department helped make even bigger.

The CFMA which was slipped into a budget/appropriations bill at the tail end of the Clinton administration is what needs to be changed. To his credit our Treasury Secretary has stated that he wants to amend it.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner announced on May 13, 2009

the Obama Administration's intent to amend the CFMA, and related laws of the Commodities Exchange Act and Securities Exchange Act, changing the authority of regulatory bodies, including the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the Securities Exchange Commission and other regulators over previously unregulated derivatives. In brief, to constrain systemic risks, the proposal requires the clearing of all standardized over the counter derivatives through regulated central counter-parties (CCPs) via a regulated central exchange.

They do this by, first getting rid of the OTS (Office of Thrift Supervision)

The Obama administration is expected to call for the Office of Thrift Supervision -- which regulates thrifts and has faced heavy scrutiny for its supervision of American International Group Inc., Washington Mutual Inc. and IndyMac Bancorp Inc. -- to be either abolished or folded into a larger regulator with broader powers.

This seems to be the easy part, even though the OTS doesn't want to give up it's power. The tough part is figuring out who will regulate CDSs. Currently the CFTC is overseen by the House Ag Committee, which makes sense considering soybeans, pork bellies and corn futures are some of the top traded commodities. It makes less sense when considering that they are also the watchdogs for oil futures, and now potentially for credit default swaps. Both the SEC and CFTC are fighting to keep their power, so this will be an interesting battle. But in the end, we just badly need these increased regulations. I really don't care how difficult the solution is, you have to break some eggs to make ... good pancakes.

Crossposted at the Progressive Electorate and the Daily Kos

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Some people say a naked CDS is gambling, I say (4.00 / 4)
a naked CDS is like selling a fire insurance policy on my house to an arsonist who does not own my house and has no financial interest in my house except that he's betting it will burn down!

What could go wrong with that? Nobody could have foreseen any problems.


"Which I've heard was about 90% of the total market." (4.00 / 3)
As I'm sure you know "which I've heard" is about as far as any of us can go. But for a little verification, it was widely reported that ten times the value of Lehman bonds had to be paid out when that company went bankrupt.

So from the viewpoint of any taxpayer who is on the hook for all of this it should be viewed as an unregulated and secretive gambling ring that was bailed out by your tax dollars.

Now as the elected officials have bailed out all those rich speculators they are talking about how your Medicare and Social Security is running out. It won't be for many years but they have to screw you right now because they gave all your money to banks that held those credit default swaps.



Thanks Eddie (4.00 / 3)
Ya this whole thing just makes me sick. Especially since we are really seeing a disinterest in overall change in this sector. It's really disturbing that the health of our nation is measured in points of the Dow and not all the other indicators that truly matter. Can people afford healthcare and healthy food.. do they have a job.. etc.

Do you think there's any chance that we will address the too big to fail situation.. or a repeal of the Gramm Leach Bliley... which would then require us to split up these banks/investment houses?


[ Parent ]
No I don't think there is any chance. (4.00 / 3)
Back when I wrote Banking Sunshine and Regulations: Desperately Seeking Netroots I had some hope but now I've decided that Obama only gave Paul Volcker a job as an adviser to suppress his guidance.

After the fifty years of banking stability we had from regulations they are all walking around pretending they never heard of the Glass-Steagall Act.

Of course the fact that regulated make far smaller campaign contributions than the pathetic riot that our elected officials designed has nothing to do with it. Just ask any elected official and they will tell you "It's about preserving jobs."

 


[ Parent ]
Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox