Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

Mexicans Tell Obama: Sin Maiz, No Hay Pais

by: Jill Richardson

Fri Apr 17, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM PDT


Bookmark and Share
"Without corn, we have no country" ("Sin maiz, no hay pais") is the slogans Mexicans are using to tell Obama that NAFTA isn't working well for them. And I'm sure more than a few Americans would tell Mexico that NAFTA's not working well for us either. Simply put, any leader who cares about his or her people more than multinational corporations SHOULD either renegotiate or repeal NAFTA. My preference is to repeal it. The open letter to Obama from the Sin Maiz No Hay Pais campaign is below. My favorite part is where the Mexicans plainly say that their president doesn't represent the Mexican people or speak the truth about NAFTA. Yeah, I think after the last eight years we Americans know a little something about that feeling...
Jill Richardson :: Mexicans Tell Obama: Sin Maiz, No Hay Pais
Without Corn there  is no Country National CampaignOpen Letter to the  President of the United States
  • We, the people of Mexico, also want to renegotiate NAFTA to protect our corn, the jobs of millions of farmers, and the way of life in the Mexican countryside
  • Towards a new era of cooperation    between the people of Mexico and the United States, based on respect for our sovereignty, dignity, and right to sustainable development
  • We ask President Obama    for a dialogue on NAFTA
 

Honorable Barack Obama

President of the  United States of America 

1. President Obama,  Welcome to Mexico

On the occasion of your  visit to our country, we welcome you in the name of farmers’, human  rights, environmental, and sustainable development organizations, as  well as the thousands of citizens that participate in the National  Campaign Without Corn there is no Country. 

The hope of the people  of the United States, and their brave decision to end the Bush administration  and elect you as president of the United States, represents for the  people of Mexico as well a hope that we will end the era of neoliberalism  and simulated democracy, guided by the hands of large corporations.  We hope to advance towards a new era of cooperation between our people  and take up the task of pursuing sustainable human development and rights. 

The National Campaign  Without Corn there is no Country is a plural, grassroots initiative  that hopes to recoup for Mexico the right to food security sovereignty,  the right of our farmers to mantain their way of life, the right to  food for every member of our population, and the right to preserve the  genetic and cultural patrimony of our native corn varieties.  We  consider the renegotiation of the agricultural chapter of NAFTA a necessary,  but not sufficient step towards these ends. 
 
 
 
 

2. President Felipe  Calderón does not speak the truth about NAFTA

You come here to meet  with President Felipe Calderón. Surely you will not have the opportunity  to meet with representatives of civil society.  This limited opportunity  for dialogue is the motivation for our letter. 

We believe that President  Felipe Calderón does not legitimately represent the Mexican people  and won’t tell you the truth about NAFTA and its dramatic negative  impact on the economy, society, and environment in the Mexican countryside,  as well as rest of the country’s access to critical food resources.

On the contrary, President  Calderón represents the interests of the largest corporations, particularly  the agribusinesses, and pretends to “counsel” you, as he did before  in Buenos Aires and Washington, that NAFTA has benefited our people,  and Mexico, and that you should continue to deepen this failed model  of free trade. 

3. The truth behind  NAFTA and its negative impact on rural Mexico

The truth about NAFTA  and its economic, social, and environmental impact is different from  what Calderón will tell you, and you, president Obama, should know  it. 

  • Mexican emigration to the    United States has gone up in the 15 years since NAFTA went into effect.    During this time, six million Mexicans immigrated to the United States,    tripling the average of the pre-NAFTA years, and reaching five hundred    thousand Mexicans per year. Weren’t we promised that, with NAFTA,    this pattern would stop, as it was the result of a lack of opportunity    in Mexico and the asymmetry in salaries and labor conditions? Instead,    doesn’t the continued and increased immigration represent irrefutable    evidence of the failure of NAFTA?
  • Of the 11.9 millions of undocumented    people in the United States, 7 million are of Mexican origin.
  • In the fifteen years of NAFTA,    more Mexicans have died trying to reach the United States than Germans    trying to cross over the Berlin Wall.
  • The Mexican government has    renounced its obligation to guarantee the development of the countryside    and the production of food that had been promised as a supposed benefit    of NAFTA and the end to the use of the “escape valve” that represents,    on the one hand, migration to the United States, and, on the other,    the income generated by the cultivation and trafficking of narcotics.    In the Mexican countryside, millions of farmers lack employment opportunities    as a result of U.S. dumping, the control of the large corporations,    and the absence of a sound Mexican policy addressing agricultural production    and sustainable development.
  • With the implementation of    NAFTA, Mexico lost its food self-sufficiency.  Our country now    imports 42% of the food it consumes, representing US$22.5 billion and    an agricultural trade deficit of US$5.5 billion (2008); we import food    and export millions of farmers and members of our rural communities.
  • Dumping, including the importation    of genetically modified corn, without control, and the Mexican government’s    irresponsible decision to promote the sowing of genetically modified    corn in Mexico --corn’s center of origin and diversity-- is affecting    the way of life of millions of farmers and rural communities and the    part of Mexican culture that is created and sustained through our food.    This only serves to improve the sales and purposes of Monsanto. You    cannot separate food from the way it is produced, acquired, and consumed.    A study on genetically modified corn in Mexico produced by the North    American Commission on Environmental Cooperation, and conducted by Dr.    Jose Sarukhán, recommended, among other things, that corn imported    from the United States should be immediately ground as a measure to    prevent its incorporation into the human food chain and protect native    seeds from contamination. Furthermore, genetically modified seeds are    contaminating the dozens of races and thousands of varieties of native    corn that represent our genetic patrimony and an invaluable cultural    resource, not only for Mexico, but for all of humanity. More than simply    being the way we consume nutrients, calories, and protein, food is culture,    it is identity; adequate nourishment is culture. As current White House    food and backyard gardening practices show, we are confident that you    are already well aware of these issues and we congratulate and appreciate    the commitment to healthy, organic and locally produced food that your    Administration has demonstrated. Right now, we want to be able to dialogue    about promoting the same healthy eating and growing practices in Mexico,    and ask for your support across the border.
  • The prices of the basic basket    of goods have increased ten-fold in the fifteen years of NAFTA. In the    period of the administration of president Calderón alone they have    increased 70%. While 65% of the Mexican population lives in poverty,    our salaries have lost 70% of their purchasing power, more than 7.3    million Mexicans are unemployed in the first trimester of this year,    and more than 55% of the economically active population works in the    informal sector, without social security. Hunger stops being a mystery    we need to explain through human decisions; the physical and economic    access to food has stopped being a right. Hunger and malnutrition are    a problem caused not by a lack of resources, but rather by a failure    in the nutritional quality of the goods available, as well as their    quantity and cultural acceptability, both of which affect our quality    of life and human dignity.
  • Mexico is a country of malnourished    people, where the right to food is systematically violated. On one side,    20 million Mexicans are under-nourished and suffer from anemia. As in    sub-Saharan Africa, they are principally children under five-years-old    who live in rural areas and are members of indigenous communities. On    the other hand 70% of Mexicans suffer from obesity due to the consumption    of junk food (and drink) produced by the largest food companies. We    have the second highest levels in the word of obesity and soft drink    consumption.
  • It is concerning that the    farmers’ organizations that are defending their rights, the right    to food of all of the Mexicans, fighting against the planting of genetically    modified corn, and against the large agricultural and food corporations,    are being persecuted by the authorities who invent crimes of which to    accuse them. This criminalizes the right to defend our economic, social,    cultural, and environmental rights.
  • With NAFTA, the plundering    of land and natural resources in indigenous and rural communities intensified.    This has generated more poverty in the rural areas of Mexico. The land    is used for large investments projects (dams, highways, airports, agro-industrial    parks, etc) run by transnational or para-statal groups, and administered    by private companies. These companies systematically violate the human    rights of the population and the international agreements signed by    Mexico, including article 169 of the OIT for indigenous communities    and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
  • President Calderón says    that NAFTA is working; the 20 largest corporations that control the    system of agro-industry in Mexico agree. Nevertheless, the majority    of Mexicans think otherwise, confirmed by a recent study. 73% of Mexicans    and 72% of their leaders think that Mexico should renegotiate NAFTA,    and more than any other part, the agricultural chapter.
  • Thanks to the neoliberal    social and economic policies that have deepened with NAFTA, inequality    in Mexico has gone up (the richest 10% of the population controls 65%    of our national wealth; president Calderón can boast the proud record    of having one of the richest men in the world as a Mexican while at    the same time we have the lowest growth rate of all of Latin American    and the Caribbean).
  • In sum, NAFTA was negotiated    by and for the large corporations of North America. In Mexico, NAFTA    was negotiated badly and implemented even worse.
  • We have lost our sovereignty    and become a dependent country; the agreement has only benefited large    corporations and a small minority of agro-exporters, making losers of    our farmers, our workers, and our environment.
 

At the same time, President  Obama, the lack of security and the growth of organized crime that worry  us so much have been the result of the following causes: 1) lack of  job opportunities, adequate salaries, and education for millions; 2)  increasing inequality; 3) corruption and impunity; 4) a failure of credibility  on the part of the government and its institutions that that only represent  interest groups and defend the privileged; and 5) a failed, unilateral,  partial and superficial strategy based on militarization. 

As long as he continues  to ignore the economic, social and institutional causes of the source  of organized crime, the strategy of President Calderón will continue  to fail. 

4. Our proposal for  the renegotiation of NAFTA and the construction of a new era of cooperation  for sustainable development

As the preceding points  have made clear, we believe that it is critical to negotiate NAFTA not  only for the people of the United States —as you yourself articulated  in your presidential campaign— but also for the people of Mexico. 

We put before you, the  Congress, and the people of the United States the following points to  build a new era of cooperation between our people with the purpose of  promoting sustainable development and a respect for human rights as  well as the sovereignty of each of our countries: 

I. Renegotiate NAFTA  to recuperate our sovereignty and food security, for the right to preserve our own varieties of native corn without contamination  by genetically modified seeds; for the right to produce our own food;  for the right to maintain the work and way of life of three million  corn growers and their families; for the right to the existence and  value of our cultural and identity as a people of corn; for the right  to sustainable human development in the Mexican countryside. 

II. Establish  a tri-national cooperation agreement for agricultural development and human development in rural areas, including  creating a fund for structural investment and social cohesion, the prohibition  of disloyal exports, and the suppression of protectionist non-tariff  barriers disguised as food safety regulation. 

III.  Promote a tri-national process of public debate between the administrations, congressional representatives, and civil  society, based on cooperation and working towards sustainable human  development, economic social, cultural, and environmental rights, and  the rights of workers, farmers, and migrants, as well as democratic  principles, to establish an alternative to the failed model of NAFTA. 

IV.  Promote immigration reform in the United States that permits legalization of the undocumented workers, opposes a wall  along the border, and does not criminalize those in the United States  without documentation.  
 

V.  Declare, in addition to everything else, a moratorium on the Alliance  for Security and Prosperity of North America. We say “no” to  the militarization of the border. The growing power of organized crime  in Mexico is a product of inequality, the lack of employment opportunities  and a dignified life for the majority of the Mexicans, largely from  the countryside, and the lack of a government that responds to their  needs, rights, and dreams. 

To expand on what we  have written, we would be grateful for the opportunity to begin a direct  dialogue with you and your Administration.  

Sincerely, 

The Countryside  Won’t Take It Anymore

Without Corn there  is No Country

Hunger  Cannot Wait

Mexican  Food for Mexico

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
boy we the people (4.00 / 3)
of both nations really got screwed by Nafta.

A few years ago, my family went on a trip to Mexico. My late husband spoke fluent Spanish and once had a business exporting clothes and jewelry. Anyway we landed in Cancun (yuck) rented a car and drove across the Yucatan on the back roads. The utter poverty and hunger was staggering.
This isn't the "Calderon" Mexico you see in Cancun.


Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox