Photobucket


La Vida Locavore
 Subscribe in a reader
Follow La Vida Locavore on Twitter - Read La Vida Locavore on Kindle

My Letter to Tom Vilsack Re: Bad Potential Food Safety Appointees

by: Jill Richardson

Sat Mar 07, 2009 at 22:59:02 PM PST


Bookmark and Share
Earlier Desmoinesdem posted an action alert about disappointing potential USDA appointees. Here's a letter I just sent to AgSec@usda.gov - it's similar to the letter Desmoinesdem posted... but I doctored it up a bit with my own creative touches.

Dear Secretary Vilsack,

I was initially a skeptic when you were appointed but thus far you've impressed me. That said, I would definitely change my positive opinion of you if you choose to appoint either Michael Osterholm or Michael Taylor to any position at the USDA. I ask that you take the lead in helping America protect the safety of its food supply by appointing a real reformer at the I USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) position and advising President Obama not to name Michael Taylor to any position in the administration.

Please appoint someone other than Michael Osterholm, who has proven to be too biased in favor of a single technology that has been ineffective in stopping food safety outbreaks and is something that most American consumers don't want. My feeling on irradiation is that sterile shit is still shit and I don't want it in my food. As Marion Nestle called it, "it is a late-stage techno-fix to a problem that should never have happened in the first place."

I took the President at his word when he said he would close the revolving door in this new administration and I know that you want to lead a new era at the USDA. If you look in the dictionary under "revolving door" you will literally see Michael Taylor's picture. Why would you want to open up the USDA to that kind of critique or ridicule by appointing him?

Please appoint true reformers to positions within the USDA to help you transform America's food and farm system for the 21st century.

Thanks for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jill Richardson

More info coming on this topic soon, courtesy of Ms. Obama Foodorama :) I urge everyone to send letters like this to the email address listed above - or wait for more information and send your own personalized letter then.

Jill Richardson :: My Letter to Tom Vilsack Re: Bad Potential Food Safety Appointees
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Jill, that's a great letter... (4.00 / 3)
I'm not as up on these issues as I should be, but I'll be glad to email him when I have more information.

The most remarkable thing about my mother is that for thirty years she served the family nothing but leftovers. The original meal has never been found. -- Calvin Trillin

Yes, seconded on the letter! (4.00 / 3)
Hi, Youff!

:)

(waving to you...)

Word is that Michael Taylor and Michael Osterholm will soon be appointed to major positions at USDA.  This is bad news...

Taylor is Mr. Monsanto, and he's bounced back and forth for years now between government and Monsanto.  And yes, unfortunately many of those previous government positions came courtesy of the Clinton administration.  Taylor has the ears of many Democrats, unfortunately.  Even those who should know better.

As for Osterholm, well let's just say that if he had his way?  We'd all live in little personal irradiation units (helmets maybe?) 24 / 7, and literally be forced to eat sterilized shit.  Which very well may not cause harm, but as Marion Nestle and Jill have said many times - nuked shit is still shit, and it shouldn't be in our food in the first place.  There are better ways to solve that problem...

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens


[ Parent ]
Hi, Jay! (waving back) (4.00 / 3)
Okay, thanks for the info.  I am definitely anti-Monsanto; and irradiating food is just stupid.  IMHO, of course.  But I'm with Jill on this: we need real reformers, regulations and regulators with teeth, and to eradicate, once and for all, the silly notion that businesses will regulate themselves (although I will say that the women who illegally sold tamales on the street in NYC were less likely to give you food poisoning than some of the "inspected" restaurants).

Anyway: industry, including the food industry, was regulated for valid reasons and deregulation was absurd in the first place: now, after about 30 years of conservatism, we are seeing its consequences up close & personal, & it's a very ugly picture.

The most remarkable thing about my mother is that for thirty years she served the family nothing but leftovers. The original meal has never been found. -- Calvin Trillin


[ Parent ]
no problem (4.00 / 3)
irradiation is the main thing that's at stake here, as well as the ties Osterholm and Taylor have with major corporations like Monsanto. Marion Nestle has written about Taylor as the very definition of the "revolving door" between industry and government. But Osterholm's known as a promoter of irradiation, which doesn't fix the problem when it happens (i.e. keep poop out of the food supply). I mean, in the case of PCA and the peanuts, sure irradiation might have kept the peanuts clean. But so would not allowing their factories to operate with mouse poop and bird nests and leaks in the ceilings! And there are questions about nutrient degradation from irradiation too.

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Would you like some irradiated chicken poop (4.00 / 3)
with your breakfast?!

Seriously, what part of "your food may have some really nasty sh!t in it, but don't worry we've zapped it" is ok?!


[ Parent ]
I have to wonder if they'ved discussed what's (4.00 / 3)
happening in Australia?

http://www.google.com/search?h...


oh gosh that is terribly disturbing (4.00 / 2)
my cats are my children! I would be so upset if they were killed by their food!

"I can understand someone from Iowa promoting corn and soy, but we are not feeding the world, we are feeding animals and soft drink companies." - Jim Goodman

[ Parent ]
Yeah, and this isn't the first time we've seen (4.00 / 3)
our pets (or human children for that matter) being used as test subjects and the results ignored. If they only would have done something after March 16th 2007, or 2004 or . . . .

I can NOT imagine giving my pets a meal and sickening (or killing) them. I've seen videos of the effected cats that owners have posted online. Heartbreaking is an understatement.


[ Parent ]
I posted about this at DKos and MyDD (4.00 / 2)
and some commenters said Osterholm is one of the country's leading epidemiologists, so he's fine by them.

I don't dispute that he is a good epidemiologist, but that doesn't mean I want irradiation to become our first line of defense on the food safety front.


Yeah... (4.00 / 1)
You're probably not ever gonna win an irradiation argument at dKos.  There are massive amounts of people there who don't mind (quite literally) eating shit, as long as it's fed to them with "scientific" reassurances.  Fundamentalism doesn't only come in religious forms...

"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks." - Christopher Hitchens

[ Parent ]
Slightly tangential (4.00 / 2)
but still relevant. George Will (yes, that George Will) actually has a column this morning agreeing with Michael Pollan and criticizing corn-feeding cattle!

Political Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Notable Diaries
- The 2007 Ag Census
- Cuba Diaries
- Mexico Diaries
- Bolivia Diaries
- Philippines Diaries
- My Visit to Growing Power
- My Trip to a Hog Confinement
- Why We Grow So Much Corn and Soy
- How the Chicken Gets to Your Plate

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Blogs
- Beginning Farmers
- Chews Wise
- City Farmer News
- Civil Eats
- Cooking Up a Story
- Cook For Good
- DailyKos
- Eating Liberally
- Epicurean Ideal
- The Ethicurean
- F is For French Fry
- Farm Aid Blog
- Food Politics
- Food Sleuth Blog
- Foodgirl.ca
- Foodperson.com
- Ghost Town Farm
- Goods from the Woods
- The Green Fork
- Gristmill
- GroundTruth
- Irresistable Fleet of Bicycles
- John Bunting's Dairy Journal
- Liberal Oasis
- Livable Future Blog
- Marler Blog
- My Left Wing
- Not In My Food
- Obama Foodorama
- Organic on the Green
- Rural Enterprise Center
- Take a Bite Out of Climate Change
- Treehugger
- U.S. Food Policy
- Yale Sustainable Food Project

Reference
- Recipe For America
- Eat Well Guide
- Local Harvest
- Sustainable Table
- Farm Bill Primer
- California School Garden Network

Organizations
- The Center for Food Safety
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Community Food Security Coalition
- The Cornucopia Institute
- Farm Aid
- Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
- Food and Water Watch
-
National Family Farm Coalition
- Organic Consumers Association
- Rodale Institute
- Slow Food USA
- Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
- Union of Concerned Scientists

Magazines
- Acres USA
- Edible Communities
- Farmers' Markets Today
- Mother Earth News
- Organic Gardening

Book Recommendations
- Animal, Vegetable, Miracle
- Appetite for Profit
- Closing the Food Gap
- Diet for a Dead Planet
- Diet for a Small Planet
- Food Politics
- Grub
- Holistic Management
- Hope's Edge
- In Defense of Food
- Mad Cow USA
- Mad Sheep
- The Omnivore's Dilemma
- Organic, Inc.
- Recipe for America
- Safe Food
- Seeds of Deception
- Teaming With Microbes
- What To Eat

User Blogs
- Beyond Green
- Bifurcated Carrot
- Born-A-Green
- Cats and Cows
- The Food Groove
- H2Ome: Smart Water Savings
- The Locavore
- Loving Spoonful
- Nourish the Spirit
- Open Air Market Network
- Orange County Progressive
- Peak Soil
- Pink Slip Nation
- Progressive Electorate
- Trees and Flowers and Birds
- Urbana's Market at the Square


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox